Yeah. Normally the doctors who push things they won't take are the ones who are clearly corrupt, but they do not represent the majority of the profession.
My own policy is that if possible, I won't recommend something I have not had done to me or tried first.
Yeah. Normally the doctors who push things they won't take are the ones who are clearly corrupt, but they do not represent the majority of the profession.
My own policy is that if possible, I won't recommend something I have not had done to me or tried first.
Your policy is logical enough. Unfortunately, one must allow for the hopefully very rare case: A doctor who does practice what he preaches (e.g. uses a drug he also prescribes) yet either is unaware that it's harmful or worse, knows it is. On second thought, allow me to amend that: We already know that it is NOT "very rare," at least in the case of the mRNA jabs. I don't have statistics (and I wouldn't give them any credibility if I did) but it's safe to say a large fraction of doctors took the mRNA experimental potions. Of all personnel, those in the medical field should have known early on that these products were at best unknown quantities with dubious credentials, or as the months wore on and evidence (more likely "rumor") arose, they demonstrably were ineffective and probably dangerous. Upon challenge, many would confess "I had to take it, or I would lose my job." Well that was probably true, but really, you would gamble your health and your life on a sketchy product, and now you expect me to trust you with my own health care? I think not! And there's the "true believer," the medic who is sure that all is above board, that Pharma, the FDA and the CDC can do no wrong, that the jabs are next-generation technology, and that any naysayers are clearly deluded anti-vaxxers. I'm not sure which is more dangerous to the patient; the scary thing is it must be the case that a large portion, perhaps the majority, of our health care providers fit one of the above categories.
Even a gross abrogation of ethics that the mRNA "vaccines" have been, they have served some positive purposes, not the least of which is to show in startling relief how corrupt mainstream medicine has been.
A big part of why I'm investing the time I am into the sub stack it was because I am very hopeful that the where Covid was handled pushed too far and there is now a window to bring the general public's attention to a lot of issues that have been ignored in the background since long before I was born.
We appreciate your investment. As writers- we know how much time and thought goes into laying out evidence, conjectures, connections, metaphors and symbols to move the needle towards enlightenment.
Yeah. Normally the doctors who push things they won't take are the ones who are clearly corrupt, but they do not represent the majority of the profession.
My own policy is that if possible, I won't recommend something I have not had done to me or tried first.
Your policy is logical enough. Unfortunately, one must allow for the hopefully very rare case: A doctor who does practice what he preaches (e.g. uses a drug he also prescribes) yet either is unaware that it's harmful or worse, knows it is. On second thought, allow me to amend that: We already know that it is NOT "very rare," at least in the case of the mRNA jabs. I don't have statistics (and I wouldn't give them any credibility if I did) but it's safe to say a large fraction of doctors took the mRNA experimental potions. Of all personnel, those in the medical field should have known early on that these products were at best unknown quantities with dubious credentials, or as the months wore on and evidence (more likely "rumor") arose, they demonstrably were ineffective and probably dangerous. Upon challenge, many would confess "I had to take it, or I would lose my job." Well that was probably true, but really, you would gamble your health and your life on a sketchy product, and now you expect me to trust you with my own health care? I think not! And there's the "true believer," the medic who is sure that all is above board, that Pharma, the FDA and the CDC can do no wrong, that the jabs are next-generation technology, and that any naysayers are clearly deluded anti-vaxxers. I'm not sure which is more dangerous to the patient; the scary thing is it must be the case that a large portion, perhaps the majority, of our health care providers fit one of the above categories.
Even a gross abrogation of ethics that the mRNA "vaccines" have been, they have served some positive purposes, not the least of which is to show in startling relief how corrupt mainstream medicine has been.
A big part of why I'm investing the time I am into the sub stack it was because I am very hopeful that the where Covid was handled pushed too far and there is now a window to bring the general public's attention to a lot of issues that have been ignored in the background since long before I was born.
We appreciate your investment. As writers- we know how much time and thought goes into laying out evidence, conjectures, connections, metaphors and symbols to move the needle towards enlightenment.