Attacks on Americans either directly or on their rights and freedoms started the day after we declared independence. It;s just that as of more recent the attacks have intensified. A century ago they were trying to use the justification of eugenics to rid society of what the upper-class people considered undesirables. Those with wealth an…
Attacks on Americans either directly or on their rights and freedoms started the day after we declared independence. It;s just that as of more recent the attacks have intensified. A century ago they were trying to use the justification of eugenics to rid society of what the upper-class people considered undesirables. Those with wealth and power who see them selves as above the rest of us peasants have been attacking America/Americans since day 1 b/c Americans did something that could not go unpunished for it showed that a nation doesn't have to be the tax mule of another. Anytime a nation in recent history has tried to break free from the ruling classes control the nations leader(s) found themselves the victim of an attack (usually by America) and or a coup or similar. Sadam wasn't a threat, there were no WMD's. he was trying to break free of a couple of dependency circles his nations was in and so America was tasked with replacing him under the guise of WMD's. Kahdafi tried to break free and also found himself replaced.
The ruling class who control centralized banking don't like it when a slave tries to break free of their monetary control. I'm no fan of either Sadam or Kahdafi but I can see BS as well as smell it.
Attacks on Americans either directly or on their rights and freedoms started the day after we declared independence. It;s just that as of more recent the attacks have intensified. A century ago they were trying to use the justification of eugenics to rid society of what the upper-class people considered undesirables. Those with wealth and power who see them selves as above the rest of us peasants have been attacking America/Americans since day 1 b/c Americans did something that could not go unpunished for it showed that a nation doesn't have to be the tax mule of another. Anytime a nation in recent history has tried to break free from the ruling classes control the nations leader(s) found themselves the victim of an attack (usually by America) and or a coup or similar. Sadam wasn't a threat, there were no WMD's. he was trying to break free of a couple of dependency circles his nations was in and so America was tasked with replacing him under the guise of WMD's. Kahdafi tried to break free and also found himself replaced.
The ruling class who control centralized banking don't like it when a slave tries to break free of their monetary control. I'm no fan of either Sadam or Kahdafi but I can see BS as well as smell it.