That was surprising. Still, I think he is a good choice. I never followed him in detail, but thought most of his complaint was about the adulterations like mercury in them. If he insists on good science, they will be shown what they are one way or the other.
That was surprising. Still, I think he is a good choice. I never followed him in detail, but thought most of his complaint was about the adulterations like mercury in them. If he insists on good science, they will be shown what they are one way or the other.
the scientists can be bought not the science so even when you've purchased a scientists or 12, the fake work they produce still has to be guarded so no scientist you do not own can look to closely at it and discover it's bogus.
Sure. But not all. I believe we need, instead of having these superficial text-only peer reviews, the whole data should be required. If that isn't done, maybe there should be some sort of label required on the review, like on movies showing the level of crap that's included.
That was surprising. Still, I think he is a good choice. I never followed him in detail, but thought most of his complaint was about the adulterations like mercury in them. If he insists on good science, they will be shown what they are one way or the other.
unfortunately "science" these days can always be bought or buried.
the scientists can be bought not the science so even when you've purchased a scientists or 12, the fake work they produce still has to be guarded so no scientist you do not own can look to closely at it and discover it's bogus.
Sure. But not all. I believe we need, instead of having these superficial text-only peer reviews, the whole data should be required. If that isn't done, maybe there should be some sort of label required on the review, like on movies showing the level of crap that's included.
He showed aluminum is a known neuro toxin to the brain. Dr Chris Exley. Mr Aluminum will confirm that. All ingredients are toxic