look, the problem with that article is that the author provides no proof whatsoever for his claim, except this statement "In late 2020, when the news came out that flu is at an all-time historical low, I began to look for death rates to study the graphs and try to determine what is going on. I could not find any rates for the year 2019.…
look, the problem with that article is that the author provides no proof whatsoever for his claim, except this statement "In late 2020, when the news came out that flu is at an all-time historical low, I began to look for death rates to study the graphs and try to determine what is going on. I could not find any rates for the year 2019. They did not exist.", which doesn't really prove the argument open and is not correct (statistics for 2019 exist, and if you look at the charts, it is clear that a significant number of flu cases were re-classified as Covid, but there was also brief periods of an overall increase that coincided with peaks of the epidemic).
Everything else he is saying is a mixture of theories and assertions that Covid must not exist because it is compatible with his theories. I am extremely familiar with each of the concepts the author is referencing, but it is a very common trap people like this get stuck in where they assume everything that supports their hypothesis must be true solely because it supports their hypothesis. I try to give things a fair shot (so I'm not immediately dismissing what is written there based upon the contents and writing style… Which is what nearly any independent reader would do), but I cannot take extreme positions unless actual evidence is presented to consider them. I typically change one to two things I assert in each article on here after commenters point out areas where I messed up, so I am not averse to admitting I was wrong or considering a different perspective. However to do that there needs to be proof, and as I have tried to say here over and over, the people who are convinced viruses do not exist have not offered any proof for that claim rather they have said that the proof that has been provided for viruses is not acceptable, and unless you can provide acceptable proof (which I don't think will ever be possible to do for a hostile audience) you must admit viruses do not exist. This is equivalent to me being required to prove to a religious zealot that their God does not exist, and being expected to convert to their religion if I cannot prove their God does not exist, even though no form of proof that could be presented that would ever be deemed acceptable to refute the existence of their God.
look, the problem with that article is that the author provides no proof whatsoever for his claim, except this statement "In late 2020, when the news came out that flu is at an all-time historical low, I began to look for death rates to study the graphs and try to determine what is going on. I could not find any rates for the year 2019. They did not exist.", which doesn't really prove the argument open and is not correct (statistics for 2019 exist, and if you look at the charts, it is clear that a significant number of flu cases were re-classified as Covid, but there was also brief periods of an overall increase that coincided with peaks of the epidemic).
Everything else he is saying is a mixture of theories and assertions that Covid must not exist because it is compatible with his theories. I am extremely familiar with each of the concepts the author is referencing, but it is a very common trap people like this get stuck in where they assume everything that supports their hypothesis must be true solely because it supports their hypothesis. I try to give things a fair shot (so I'm not immediately dismissing what is written there based upon the contents and writing style… Which is what nearly any independent reader would do), but I cannot take extreme positions unless actual evidence is presented to consider them. I typically change one to two things I assert in each article on here after commenters point out areas where I messed up, so I am not averse to admitting I was wrong or considering a different perspective. However to do that there needs to be proof, and as I have tried to say here over and over, the people who are convinced viruses do not exist have not offered any proof for that claim rather they have said that the proof that has been provided for viruses is not acceptable, and unless you can provide acceptable proof (which I don't think will ever be possible to do for a hostile audience) you must admit viruses do not exist. This is equivalent to me being required to prove to a religious zealot that their God does not exist, and being expected to convert to their religion if I cannot prove their God does not exist, even though no form of proof that could be presented that would ever be deemed acceptable to refute the existence of their God.
Covid is a LIE..........PERIOD!!! There is NO proof that it exist.......NONE!!!
My bottom line on the existence of the virus, its isolation and sequencing
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022/02/03/my-bottom-line-on-the-existence-of-the-virus-its-isolation-and-sequencing/
Biggest Lie in World History: There Never Was A Pandemic. The Data Base is Flawed. The Covid Mandates including the Vaccine are Invalid
The PCR "Covid-19 Confirmed Cases" are Meaningless. The Multibillion Dollar Antigen and Home Test Project is Fake
https://www.globalresearch.ca/biggest-lie-in-world-history-the-data-base-is-flawed-there-never-was-a-pandemic-the-covid-mandates-including-the-vaccine-are-invalid/5772008
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE of the EXISTENCE for ANY VIRUS ISOLATED by ANYONE ANYWHERE in the WORLD!
Updated June,13th, 2022
https://www.drrobertyoung.com/post/there-is-no-evidence-of-the-existence-for-any-virus-isolated-by-anyone-anywhere-in-the-world-part-2?utm_campaign=ad0834e1-ea1a-4990-8658-68d5ff3bed81&utm_source=so&utm_medium=mail&cid=3f9e272e-9236-4d52-ba74-f2b656b7b05a