I have some additional remarks that may find useful for the article:
1) The Pfizer-contract was accidentally leaked by Albania and Brazil (you can find out more about it by reading about Ehden Biber, the Israeli now living in Britain who wrote about it.
The Albanian contract can be found here:
https://gogo.al/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/…
I have some additional remarks that may find useful for the article:
1) The Pfizer-contract was accidentally leaked by Albania and Brazil (you can find out more about it by reading about Ehden Biber, the Israeli now living in Britain who wrote about it.
"Further, to the extent applicable, Purchaser acknowledges that the Product shall not be serialized"
People in quality control remarked that this was a major red flag, since it made the tracing of hot lots nearly impossible, since it is not clear, how big the lot sizes of the toxic lots are and a lot of adverse events could be due to a large lot number.
2) Regarding the cationic nano-particles, I found a presentation by German cell-biologist Vanessa Schmidt-Krueger, who talked about the experiences with cationic lipids in mice
3) I have seen two videos of researchers in Germany analyzing the vaccines and both groups found impurites.
The first group analyzed only Astra-Zeneca and found, that all 4 vials from different batches were heavily polluted by foreign protein (the worst batch had 66% impurities)
The other was a German vaccinologist talking about analyzing different batches from different manufacturers. He said that all vaccines were really dirty. I can only remember that he found some heavy metals in the Pfizer vials (antimon),. If you are interested I can look for these videos, but they are in German and do not have transcripts.
I found this on Geert Vanden Bossche VSS Scientific Updates During Pandemic Times #35
A group of independent German scientists found toxic components—mostly metallic—in all the COVID vaccine samples they analyzed, “without exception” using modern medical and physical measuring techniques. The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis says that some of the toxic elements found inside the AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna vaccine vials were not listed in the ingredient lists from the manufacturers.
Sasha Latypova and Team Enigma talk about the things scientists found in vials pulled from all over the world. Most had heavy metals in them. It's an interesting video.
Cat, they are tracked via lot numbers. But as Midwestern Doctor points out, we don't know how many vials were released from each lot. That's a confounding factor when trying to assess the overall toxicity of each lot.
For example, my first shot came from Pfizer Lot ER8732. I thought initially that I didn't have any particularly negative adverse reactions to that shot. However, I became extremely sick within a few hours of receiving my second shot, which came from Pfizer Lot EW0169.
It was only much later, after being severely sickened and having lasting injuries from the second shot, that I realized I had in fact experienced adverse reactions to the first shot, but I hadn't realized this because the adverse reactions hadn't begun till a week after I got it.
In the website howbadismybatch dot com, the first lot number (ER8732) doesn't appear to generate many adverse reactions, but the second one (EW0169) does. It's approximately halfway in between those which generated no, or nearly no adverse reactions and those lots which generated the very highest number.
Does that mean Lot EW0169 was only moderately toxic? Not necessarily! It might just as easily mean there were many fewer vials from that lot which were released, compared to those lots which generated the very highest numbers of adverse reactions. I'm guessing the latter is true, because of the severity of how sick I became and because I have significant permanent injuries from it. But there's probably no way we'll ever know.
cat: Since I wrote that comment, I went back to the website which reports on this (howbadismybatch.com.) and studied it thoroughly. (I spent over three very intense, outraged hours doing so.)
I hadn't looked at howbadismybatch.com for about a year when I wrote that comment (above), and in the intervening year, a tremendous amount of data have become available. The website's creator, Craig Paardekooper, has microscopically analyzed all of the available data over this extended period of time, in numerous, exquisitely detailed and powerful ways.
With the considerable quantity of more recent data that's become available over the past year, it's now evident that both my first and second covid poison injections came from "hot lots" - those which generated high numbers of significant (very serious) adverse reactions. A year ago, when I first looked at it, there hadn't been sufficient data collected (or made public) to show this.
But the main point I made still holds true. Some lots have much higher numbers of significant adverse reactions associated with them. We really can't know whether they were much more toxic than the lots which generated extremely significant but not the highest numbers of adverse reactions, because we don't know how many doses of each lot were injected.
I'm so sorry that you've had to go through this. I would be quite angry myself. I hope that you've recovered from where you were last year or at least, that there have been some improvements in your health with your symptoms lessening, which would be an encouraging sign that further improvements are possible/probable. I'm sure you're taking care of yourself and keeping up with what's being learned. Take care of your gut too--the microbiome especially.
I have some additional remarks that may find useful for the article:
1) The Pfizer-contract was accidentally leaked by Albania and Brazil (you can find out more about it by reading about Ehden Biber, the Israeli now living in Britain who wrote about it.
The Albanian contract can be found here:
https://gogo.al/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/LEXO-KONTRATEN-E-PLOTE.pdf
At the end of page 19 it is written that
"Further, to the extent applicable, Purchaser acknowledges that the Product shall not be serialized"
People in quality control remarked that this was a major red flag, since it made the tracing of hot lots nearly impossible, since it is not clear, how big the lot sizes of the toxic lots are and a lot of adverse events could be due to a large lot number.
2) Regarding the cationic nano-particles, I found a presentation by German cell-biologist Vanessa Schmidt-Krueger, who talked about the experiences with cationic lipids in mice
https://aexperia1974.wixsite.com/factual4u/post/interview-with-dr-vanessa-schmidt-kruger
3) I have seen two videos of researchers in Germany analyzing the vaccines and both groups found impurites.
The first group analyzed only Astra-Zeneca and found, that all 4 vials from different batches were heavily polluted by foreign protein (the worst batch had 66% impurities)
The other was a German vaccinologist talking about analyzing different batches from different manufacturers. He said that all vaccines were really dirty. I can only remember that he found some heavy metals in the Pfizer vials (antimon),. If you are interested I can look for these videos, but they are in German and do not have transcripts.
Oh thank you. I will need to add these in.
I found this on Geert Vanden Bossche VSS Scientific Updates During Pandemic Times #35
A group of independent German scientists found toxic components—mostly metallic—in all the COVID vaccine samples they analyzed, “without exception” using modern medical and physical measuring techniques. The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis says that some of the toxic elements found inside the AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna vaccine vials were not listed in the ingredient lists from the manufacturers.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22140176-report-from-working-group-of-vaccine-analysis-in-germany
It appears to be a through analysis of the contents of the Covid 19"vaccines", But I am still half way through reading it. Shocking if true.
Sasha Latypova and Team Enigma talk about the things scientists found in vials pulled from all over the world. Most had heavy metals in them. It's an interesting video.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BHE5gMoQMtkg/
Perhaps this is what you are referencing: https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/alarming-new-report-from-working
I'm confused. If S/Ns weren't required, then how were the adverse effects tracked and reported?
Cat, they are tracked via lot numbers. But as Midwestern Doctor points out, we don't know how many vials were released from each lot. That's a confounding factor when trying to assess the overall toxicity of each lot.
For example, my first shot came from Pfizer Lot ER8732. I thought initially that I didn't have any particularly negative adverse reactions to that shot. However, I became extremely sick within a few hours of receiving my second shot, which came from Pfizer Lot EW0169.
It was only much later, after being severely sickened and having lasting injuries from the second shot, that I realized I had in fact experienced adverse reactions to the first shot, but I hadn't realized this because the adverse reactions hadn't begun till a week after I got it.
In the website howbadismybatch dot com, the first lot number (ER8732) doesn't appear to generate many adverse reactions, but the second one (EW0169) does. It's approximately halfway in between those which generated no, or nearly no adverse reactions and those lots which generated the very highest number.
Does that mean Lot EW0169 was only moderately toxic? Not necessarily! It might just as easily mean there were many fewer vials from that lot which were released, compared to those lots which generated the very highest numbers of adverse reactions. I'm guessing the latter is true, because of the severity of how sick I became and because I have significant permanent injuries from it. But there's probably no way we'll ever know.
Thanks for clarifying Truthbird. I'm so sorry that you had adverse reactions from the shots and are still suffering.
cat: Since I wrote that comment, I went back to the website which reports on this (howbadismybatch.com.) and studied it thoroughly. (I spent over three very intense, outraged hours doing so.)
I hadn't looked at howbadismybatch.com for about a year when I wrote that comment (above), and in the intervening year, a tremendous amount of data have become available. The website's creator, Craig Paardekooper, has microscopically analyzed all of the available data over this extended period of time, in numerous, exquisitely detailed and powerful ways.
With the considerable quantity of more recent data that's become available over the past year, it's now evident that both my first and second covid poison injections came from "hot lots" - those which generated high numbers of significant (very serious) adverse reactions. A year ago, when I first looked at it, there hadn't been sufficient data collected (or made public) to show this.
But the main point I made still holds true. Some lots have much higher numbers of significant adverse reactions associated with them. We really can't know whether they were much more toxic than the lots which generated extremely significant but not the highest numbers of adverse reactions, because we don't know how many doses of each lot were injected.
Craig (and his team) is my hero
I'm so sorry that you've had to go through this. I would be quite angry myself. I hope that you've recovered from where you were last year or at least, that there have been some improvements in your health with your symptoms lessening, which would be an encouraging sign that further improvements are possible/probable. I'm sure you're taking care of yourself and keeping up with what's being learned. Take care of your gut too--the microbiome especially.
Imo the contract says you can have batches with batchnumbers, but no serialnumbers for each vial.
I wondered that too. Maybe a typo?
There are done at the level of lots (which we do not have the totals for) but not individual vaccines.
Ok. Now I understand. Thanks Doc.