Fraud & lack of informed consent are definitely elements of a medical malpractice action. And if it can be proved that the doctor was willful, malicious, fraudulent, one can get punitive damages. The fact that mom was not allowed to accompany the kids to their appts & that she was not informed that the jabs had been given @ all (much les…
Fraud & lack of informed consent are definitely elements of a medical malpractice action. And if it can be proved that the doctor was willful, malicious, fraudulent, one can get punitive damages. The fact that mom was not allowed to accompany the kids to their appts & that she was not informed that the jabs had been given @ all (much less w/out consent) means that doctor & staff KNEW they were doing something willful, malicious & fraudulent because the jab was not, in fact, “mandatory” to attend school. I wonder why they didn’t consider that the kids would tell but by then the deed was done & can never be reversed. Anyway, the Children’s Defense lawyers know what they’re doing
Fraud & lack of informed consent are definitely elements of a medical malpractice action. And if it can be proved that the doctor was willful, malicious, fraudulent, one can get punitive damages. The fact that mom was not allowed to accompany the kids to their appts & that she was not informed that the jabs had been given @ all (much less w/out consent) means that doctor & staff KNEW they were doing something willful, malicious & fraudulent because the jab was not, in fact, “mandatory” to attend school. I wonder why they didn’t consider that the kids would tell but by then the deed was done & can never be reversed. Anyway, the Children’s Defense lawyers know what they’re doing