I've heard a lot of strange things about Einstein, such as his wife did the math for him. Fission converts less mass to energy than does fusion because the curve of binding energy, whatever cause it, is less steep. People who drank mushroom cloud rainwater died horrendous deaths. Internal beta is worse than external gamma. (Internal alph…
I've heard a lot of strange things about Einstein, such as his wife did the math for him.
Fission converts less mass to energy than does fusion because the curve of binding energy, whatever cause it, is less steep. People who drank mushroom cloud rainwater died horrendous deaths. Internal beta is worse than external gamma. (Internal alpha is worse than both.) Ionizing radiation and mustard gas both tear DNA up.
I have heard things too. I think to some extent he is a cultural icon and we always have to make our icons better in their portrayal than how they actually were.
The hype around radiation damage is masked by its believers.
The philanthropic capture of key geneticists and Big Money research into radiation fallaciously set the belief and regulatory structure of LNT or linear no threshold theory Which defines biology by nocebo to be defenceless to any dose that is cumulative through a lifetime. You can gen up on thei by searching out Edward Calabrese extensive documentation of the step by steap process that I see as key to a global regulator capture unto falsely set risk modelling - funded in Media Hype to turn your fear to its protection racket.
Now I am not saying there is no risk! But far more died from suicide after Chernobyl than directly from radiation (which was not very many at all).
But the focus of a true understanding is of little appeal to the invested identity in drama.
Chromosomal damage can repair and DNA is self repairing - and I hold regulated by the biofields of 'structured water'. Michael Levin doesn't take it as far as I claimed - but he does demonstrate electrical fields operating upstream to the 'DNA' that was assigned the role of controller or physical determiner.
Nocebo works beliefs at a level the 'conscious mind' is generalyly unaware of - for while we look out of a lens of beliefs and definitions we cannot look at them. But questioning the assumed or asserted models allows more free awareness to be release to see with. Our reactions, or triggered defences can be more destructive than the actuality, but in this we all have different patterns of adaptation, susceptibility and resilience.
The setting of the official narratives is a curious thing.
Einstein was effectively installed by Max Planck. His wife's name was removed from later editions of his Paper. We have a popular view of a world that is not at high levels unaware of the influence of new ideas and so will engage in 'shepherding' or nudging outcomes that will serve self interest - but not necessarily a public self interest. I feel not to throw out the baby with the bathwater by opinionating, but I am not drawn to elegant math modelling as much as a true human significance. Modern science teaches insignificance while technologising predictive control of a sense of meaning set in false premise following false profits. Even so it opens an opportunity to undo the false to an expanded appreciation of the true - as in seeking truth that is workable, practical felt and shared.
Have you looked at Electric Universe? - something like Safire project - that posits an electrical model for our Sun (as a node within a network of structured waters- or plasma).
I not think that mass and energy are what we think, but I do feel that without awakened responsibility for energy we will lockdown to a virtual coded trace of a life set in a deeper unconsciousness that will not be able to move to know itself alive. Or is that already the case in a descending spiral?
The physical body is not immutable or immune - but as the instant of its tangibility and visibility of you. That you are has the capacity to know that it is through extension of idea. Our 'thinking' is set in fear that it isnt, or will not be so as to fold itself in knots like an enemy (pun intended).
I've heard a lot of strange things about Einstein, such as his wife did the math for him.
Fission converts less mass to energy than does fusion because the curve of binding energy, whatever cause it, is less steep. People who drank mushroom cloud rainwater died horrendous deaths. Internal beta is worse than external gamma. (Internal alpha is worse than both.) Ionizing radiation and mustard gas both tear DNA up.
I have heard things too. I think to some extent he is a cultural icon and we always have to make our icons better in their portrayal than how they actually were.
The hype around radiation damage is masked by its believers.
The philanthropic capture of key geneticists and Big Money research into radiation fallaciously set the belief and regulatory structure of LNT or linear no threshold theory Which defines biology by nocebo to be defenceless to any dose that is cumulative through a lifetime. You can gen up on thei by searching out Edward Calabrese extensive documentation of the step by steap process that I see as key to a global regulator capture unto falsely set risk modelling - funded in Media Hype to turn your fear to its protection racket.
Now I am not saying there is no risk! But far more died from suicide after Chernobyl than directly from radiation (which was not very many at all).
But the focus of a true understanding is of little appeal to the invested identity in drama.
Chromosomal damage can repair and DNA is self repairing - and I hold regulated by the biofields of 'structured water'. Michael Levin doesn't take it as far as I claimed - but he does demonstrate electrical fields operating upstream to the 'DNA' that was assigned the role of controller or physical determiner.
Nocebo works beliefs at a level the 'conscious mind' is generalyly unaware of - for while we look out of a lens of beliefs and definitions we cannot look at them. But questioning the assumed or asserted models allows more free awareness to be release to see with. Our reactions, or triggered defences can be more destructive than the actuality, but in this we all have different patterns of adaptation, susceptibility and resilience.
The setting of the official narratives is a curious thing.
Einstein was effectively installed by Max Planck. His wife's name was removed from later editions of his Paper. We have a popular view of a world that is not at high levels unaware of the influence of new ideas and so will engage in 'shepherding' or nudging outcomes that will serve self interest - but not necessarily a public self interest. I feel not to throw out the baby with the bathwater by opinionating, but I am not drawn to elegant math modelling as much as a true human significance. Modern science teaches insignificance while technologising predictive control of a sense of meaning set in false premise following false profits. Even so it opens an opportunity to undo the false to an expanded appreciation of the true - as in seeking truth that is workable, practical felt and shared.
Have you looked at Electric Universe? - something like Safire project - that posits an electrical model for our Sun (as a node within a network of structured waters- or plasma).
I not think that mass and energy are what we think, but I do feel that without awakened responsibility for energy we will lockdown to a virtual coded trace of a life set in a deeper unconsciousness that will not be able to move to know itself alive. Or is that already the case in a descending spiral?
The physical body is not immutable or immune - but as the instant of its tangibility and visibility of you. That you are has the capacity to know that it is through extension of idea. Our 'thinking' is set in fear that it isnt, or will not be so as to fold itself in knots like an enemy (pun intended).
LNT is correct for internal alpha and SF (spontaneous fission) damage. Not so much for gamma and beta.
While I know what they do, I have no idea what mass and charge are.
Why the difference? Are alpha and SF just so much more destructive that the damage can't be repaired?
They shred both strands of DNA.