Dude, why are you just making up claims that are NOT being presented.
Kaufman and Cowan and Bailey, et alia, have offered a simple case: they want to send four (4) samples to 5 different labs. They want to see if each lab will "find" the same germ or lack thereof in the corresponding samples.
Dude, why are you just making up claims that are NOT being presented.
Kaufman and Cowan and Bailey, et alia, have offered a simple case: they want to send four (4) samples to 5 different labs. They want to see if each lab will "find" the same germ or lack thereof in the corresponding samples.
Given that Lanka proved that the current methods of "isolation" and sequencing can allow one to "invent" any type of virus, the betting money is that the labs will have divergent findings - using any method they choose. Such a challenge will demonstrate the lack of uniformity in "virology". This is exposing the fraud of HIV tests all over again. I mean, where have you been, Doc?
Lastly, are you ignoring the "in silico" method of "finding" viruses? Again, why not start with something simple? Here is a question, how many measles strains are there? How many strains of HPV are there? I mean PCR depends on the primer, and the software "genetic sequence" game allows fraud. As Kaufman noted, one of the first SARS-CoV-2 papers said that they had 1 million "candidate" sequences or genetic patterns from which to choose.
Quit defending the priests of virology and coding. Or go all in and take the Offit challenge. Either you believe that 10,000 vaccines at one time is safe, or you recognize that most medical "studies" in the realm of vaccines and viral disease are fraud. (It is as though you have no idea. Do you know about the Simpsonwood memo of 2000?)
Dude, why are you just making up claims that are NOT being presented.
Kaufman and Cowan and Bailey, et alia, have offered a simple case: they want to send four (4) samples to 5 different labs. They want to see if each lab will "find" the same germ or lack thereof in the corresponding samples.
Given that Lanka proved that the current methods of "isolation" and sequencing can allow one to "invent" any type of virus, the betting money is that the labs will have divergent findings - using any method they choose. Such a challenge will demonstrate the lack of uniformity in "virology". This is exposing the fraud of HIV tests all over again. I mean, where have you been, Doc?
Lastly, are you ignoring the "in silico" method of "finding" viruses? Again, why not start with something simple? Here is a question, how many measles strains are there? How many strains of HPV are there? I mean PCR depends on the primer, and the software "genetic sequence" game allows fraud. As Kaufman noted, one of the first SARS-CoV-2 papers said that they had 1 million "candidate" sequences or genetic patterns from which to choose.
Quit defending the priests of virology and coding. Or go all in and take the Offit challenge. Either you believe that 10,000 vaccines at one time is safe, or you recognize that most medical "studies" in the realm of vaccines and viral disease are fraud. (It is as though you have no idea. Do you know about the Simpsonwood memo of 2000?)