254 Comments
author

In full disclosure, I believe there are a variety of health issues being created by the EMFs from these new technologies but I did not focus on them in the article because they were tangential to the primary point.

Expand full comment
Nov 3Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

How do I love you? Let me count the ways!

Expand full comment

Just think if all humans could find good healthcare! We wouldn't need to beg for medical healers like AMD.!! We wouldn't be ranked so far down on the scale for positive medical outcomes.

Expand full comment
founding
Nov 4·edited 13 hrs ago

Just wondering, MWD - in your enthusiasm for Musk's work and the possibility of immense wealth from other planets, have you thought about the vast amount of pollution each rocket launch creates - and the damage done to the ionosphere which powers the global electrical circuit, the global "chi" which "flows from sky to earth, circulates through our meridians and gives us life" - by these thousands of satellites, raining microwave radiation throughout the heavens and down upon us? (see Arthur Firstenberg's "The Invisible Rainbow" p391 & chapter 9, p 115 . . .)

It is not just a matter of human health (which is crucial enough, given the deleterious physiological, mental and emotional effects upon all of us, whether we perceive it or not) - but also of all life in our biosphere.

Expand full comment
author

Yes that's part of why I left this comment

Expand full comment

I and many others are already living on the edges of society due to health consequences of nnEMFs. Increasing this technology is HORRIBLE not only to human life but to all life.

Expand full comment

Another interesting piece. Have you ever take a look at dendritic cell vaccines and specifically DCVax?

Expand full comment

Why do doctors refer to EMF rather than EMR?

Expand full comment

Probably because it's the particular frequencies of electromagnetic radiation which can be harmful. Visible light, for example, occurs at a frequency that is totally safe.

Expand full comment

The truth is that the primary health hazard of EMF is UVB/C at 280nm. This is the primary frequency of partially ionizing radiation produced by the ozone layer and by combustion, especially car engines. This energy can be absorbed by the electrical wiring of homes and travels in copper at about two feet per second. It is accessible at wifi and all appliances connected to the power grid. Energetically sensitive people can feel this. They blame it on lower frequency EMF. This radiation gets into the body and ionizes blood, lipids, and other fluids in the body creating free radicals which are a major cause of many chronic illnesses. The reason scientists don't see this is partly because they aren't looking for it and partly because it is absorbed in the molecular bonds of air molecules, primarily nitrogen. If they solved this problem, much of chronic illness would vanish and Big Pharma/med profits would plummet.

Expand full comment
deletedNov 4
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

You need to see a homeopathic doctor. Remedies like Natrum Sulphur can heal even very old concussion symptoms.

Expand full comment
Nov 3Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

In healthcare, the incentive is wrongly placed. Doctors should be compensated when the patient is healthy and stop paying them when the patient is sick.

Expand full comment

As long as doctors continue to work within the "treat the symptoms with drugs" paradigm, the patients can never be brought back to health. All medical schools receive funding from pharma and therefore only teach drugs as the treatment. Insurance companies like this as it allows short doctor visits with easy to reimburse treatments(fits into their coding system) vs multiple return visits as doctor and patients work on a more detailed treatment involving lifestyle changes.

Expand full comment

As in ancient China, I believe. We have sickness, not health, services, with little interest in having sound health to begin with.

Expand full comment

THIS WOULD BE THE<BEST>SOLUTION TO THIS<CORRUPT> PRESENT /SYSTEM..!!!!!!!!

Expand full comment

Strictly followed, the policy of not paying those whose patients are sick will disincentivize doctors from taking the hard cases. Absolutely NO one will take on a patient with borderline personality disorder, or oppositional defiance, or known terminal disease, etc. This policy will vastly expand the demand for euthanasia and incidence of suicide. So I'm not a fan. That being said, doctors should be held to account for failing to suggest and promote to patients the lifestyle choices that can improve their health.

An example of a major roadblock to this last goal is broad cultural support of the mega billion dollar industry fostering and catering to sexually transmitted diseases that affect people with and without a choice in the matter.

Expand full comment

Excellent idea. You are hired to lead the reformulation of medical care.

Expand full comment
Nov 4·edited Nov 4

I too heard it had been tried in China. It's easy to see that it did not catch on - it would incentivize patients to malinger.

I have a better idea: patient-owned medical primary care insurance coops where the doctors get paid a set monthly sum for each patient-member. In such a system, it is more profitable for each doctor to see the least number of patients, and so the motivation is to keep the patients overall in good health.

Expand full comment

I believe this form of paying doctors used to exist in China?? which doesn't mean it's a bad idea at all! I like it.

Expand full comment

I had heard (as an acupuncturist myself) that this was how acupuncturists of old worked.....Ive never heard it applied to western medicine.....but I could be wrong

Expand full comment

You do a great job of exposing the pharmaceutical cartels and the inner workings of our corrupt medical system and associated government agencies. If it hasn’t yet, there will come a day when your curiosity will shift and those rabbit holes will lead you to questioning everything else. EVERYTHING we have ever been taught.

I believe the next few years will bring many revelations about our world, its history, and what has been hidden from us for centuries. This may truly be the best time in history to be alive. A great awakening is upon us.

Keep up the good work! You are making a difference.

To everyone else, please keep an open mind. Difficult truths are coming.

Expand full comment

I’m prepared to hear them. It’s frustrating but also freeing to know that something is about to burst open. I want to be part of it.

Expand full comment

Disenchanted PharmD, I agree: we have been lied to about SO much! I'm tired of the segment of the "elite" who hoard and keep their knowledge from the rest of us. Nicotine is but one of a thousand examples.

Expand full comment

College student debt, or social safety nets are not the reason for the lack of industrialization in the US. The real culprits are the greedy speculators and financialists who turned the economy into a casino.

Oligarchs like Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg, and Peter Theil are fronts for the spook state. They owe most of their wealth to military surveillance contracts.

Unfortunately, the voracious ruling elite are not happy with 99% of all wealth and want every last drop--100%. In order to accomplish this objective they would need to demolish the last vestiges of democracy and introduce a technocratic neofeudal surveillance state. In fact, many of the strategies deployed by China would be implemented in the US.

It should be noted, that it doesn't matter what political party you support--Repubs or Dems the outcome will be the same. Techno/fascist billionaires and trillion dollar asset management firms are determined to make neofeudalism great again.

Expand full comment

Charlotte, unfortunately, "a technocratic neofeudal surveillance state" (I love your phrase!) already exists with recording and filing of content written online, IP addresses, the internet of things, "smart" meters spying on everybody, and traffic light cameras that violate our in-car privacy.

The people behind this are psychopathic voyeurs control freaks who need to be put legislatively in their place.

Expand full comment

Excellent article!

I'd add that their is a third way to produce wealth: provide services for those doing the work of creating something of wealth. For example Donald Trump's grandfather Friedrich, who as a teenager came from Germany to pursue the gold rush in Seattle and then Alaska. Instead of going after gold, he provided services (restaurants) that the other people going after the gold needed and were willing to pay extraordinary amounts for.

Thank you for pointing out Bill Gates evil background with Microsoft, those of us in the tech industry that grew up with this were well aware of it, but it's likely that the younger generations are completely unaware of his business tactics.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you. I would argue that falls under producing value

Expand full comment
Nov 3Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

Yes, and I could definitely see that!

One of my concerns is the American economy shifting from "manufacturing" to "services". To me "services" are far more fragile. For a strong economy "manufacturing" is necessary. A balance of both is essential.

By the way, awesome coverage of Elon Musk! You've opened my eyes to see his endeavors from a different viewpoint!

Expand full comment

Yes, even Window was the theft of Jobs' graphics interface. Gates was a marketer, no tech genius in any shape or form.

Expand full comment
Nov 3·edited Nov 3

All this optimism depends on a Trump presidency. The election is not in doubt; this will be a battle of the ballot count. Both sides have spent the last 4 years planning, one side how to cheat, the other side how to squelch their antics. Please God the Republicans are more organised, and better prepared, than last time.

Expand full comment
author

Kind of. The way Trump's campaign has gone. the MAHA movement is not going away and will continue to grow. A lot of these issues were previously things less than 1% of the population believed but now more than 10% believe. Regardless of who is elected, that can't be contained.

Expand full comment

Mattias Desmet says 10% can bring the change. If you consider 1% is holding the world for ransom it makes sense.

Expand full comment

Twitter somehow was worth 800 billion before Musk bought it for what, 40 b? Where did the 700+b of value go?

Also, why are profitable companies still on the stock market.... We were taught the market was to get funding to grow, but now it's just a casino table.

Cutting employees in an already high profit margin business is done to funnel wealth up to the executives and shareholders.

See the layers of the scam? END STAGE CAPITALISM

And even then, Musk being worth 100b+ he couldn't get the money. Wonder why? Because he's not actually wealthy, his controllers are. That's why he can say good stuff but DESPITE ELON THEY STILL CENSOR AND SHADOW BAN PEOPLE ON TWITTER!

As for Mars, why should we waste money going into space when we haven't even finished exploring the oceans (and many other things)?

Space travel is like any military spending. Very expensive for what it actually gives back. It also requires a lot of energy and rare minerals!!! 💰 💰 💰

SPACE X IS JUST ANOTHER MILITARY CONTRACTOR LIKE NASA USED TO HIRE IN THE PAST. They are not accomplishing anything new... In fact they seem to be behind from when it was run more in house with NASA. But anyway, it's basically a satellite installation business. Spy satellites are the bread and butter of space travel. Even starlink is a re brand of what direct TV used to sell.

Expand full comment

I'm also a little confused about AMDs mention of humanoid robots with little comment. Sure, you can use robots to go into outer space, but what will they do to human life here?

And what about Musk's neural implants which if they can be made to work will go quite a ways down the road of transhumanism.

I appreciate a lot of what Musk says and does but AMD seems to think most of this is all to the good, but there is a ton of bad there too.

Mostly just elaborating on some of your points.

Expand full comment
author

His intent is to have them serve as personal assistants that dramatically reduce the amount of work humans need to do.

Expand full comment

Personal assistants for them.

We all know the dreams and hopes of people like Musk and other tech oligarchs.

Just see how he is a big part of the carbon climate change agenda, pushing lithium battery cars. If he was honest or intelligent, he would know that whole thing is a huge scam.

Same with vaccines, he's not necessarily convinced that they're bad, he's playing like he's not sure.

That's the Hallmark of a controlled op gatekeeper.

They steer the focus of those seeking the truth into diversions and distractions.

Expand full comment

If only Elon knew about cars run by magnets and also by water both of which have been suppressed and the patents obscured maybe he'd use his money to revive them.

Somewhere between 1910 and 1930 was when I believe I read about a steam-powered car having been invented.

And if you watched the movie, "Tucker" you will see how Detroit set up an innocent Preston Tucker, ruined him, and literally stole his innovations: rear disc brakes, seat belts, center turning headlamp, and much more.

Expand full comment
Nov 3·edited Nov 3

And that's always a good thing? What are people going to do instead? Collect UBI and sit around like in Wall-E?

I'm not saying this stuff can even be stopped but let's not pretend it's all roses and lollipops.

I don't think people are going to hang out in the agora and listen to Aristotle, if you catch my drift. It will be endless television, junk food and bad health. Yeah, Wall-E.

Expand full comment
author

These changes are almost certainly inevitable. In my eyes, the best situation is if someone with a sense of ethics is directing the technology's proliferation (which what Musk is doing).

Anyhow, as much as I like to be able to defend my positions, I just don't have time to respond to most of the comments I receive on here (including ones I really want to due to the health needs the people have), so you can take the points I put forward here as you will.

Expand full comment

I'm not that certain about some of Musk's ethics. And it will be money that directs the proliferation anyhow, not a person with ethics.

Expand full comment

And even if one person in the field is trying to be ethical, others won't be so constrained.

I want a "personal assistant" ruled by chips and far away programmers as much as I want smart refrigerators spying on me.

Expand full comment

read my last blog on neuralink, and see for yourself what spirits guides him...i will write another one about end times, as this certainly looks like we are there, implants into the brains of billions, is not yet another funfact we can dismiss , those who can not think in terms of evil will be deluded heavily, and the choice now is: no choice, there is absolutely nothing fascinating ahead!

Expand full comment

Ethics? Elon Musk supports genocide.

Elon Musk promotes carbon climate change.

Please wake up. We need you on the side of truth, not dreaming of bullshit.

Expand full comment

so true, this is the eqastion of DEATH CO2=P+S+E+C, i write about medical stuff too, but not like AMD tractacts for self indulgance, as i have no time for that, but CO2 is cold, and death, O2 is fire and life, whoever equates for DEATH you know what side is he on! IT IS VERY SIMPLE!!

health is equation with O2 on the right side (or left ) however you like it.

But try explain that to a person that needs to use 100 pages to explain something very simple as cocking a meal, which medicine is, its more about practice than phylosphy.

Simple truths are not recognized as genius lol, we need methodical 100 page approach to discern if Musk is guy who supports ventilators during covid or not! he built those, to switch the story on Joe rogan podcast that he knew all a long vents were killing people. Now switching coats over night also did not ring the alram bell in many.

Expand full comment

Isn't it funny that some people have blind belief in some space hype tend to ignore the facts on earth of these people?

Elon is another oligarch who promotes the dystopian wef dreams of a future robot economy, but somehow these people who didn't trust big tech will bend over for Elon or any other bullshitter.

Whatever... Why are so many falling for the bullshit of oligarchs?

Who knows, but at least we don't fall for that shit 💜.

Thanks for the support. I don't expect an honest response from AMD. I can't get one from my father. Pride is poison.

Expand full comment

AMD eats lies, as well so she can not see things clearly, she is all into her me myself and I........building followers, playing important :) last article was funny where she explaind how she was much smarter than the rest who should be smarter than her, that was enough for me, plus here solutions DMSO must work as she is very methodical here and spent a lot of time, lol, she wants to be another savior of the world :) never tried hereslef most probably, is just another "thing" these doctors love, they never explain WHY something works the way it works as they do not bother they want quick fix, quick money solution

Expand full comment

I believe he's a satanist as is his mother. He's a liar too. His family was very wealthy from emerald mines I believe. I've seen his mother doing all the signs of satanists and elon even wore the baphomet costume and it's his profile picture. There are so many layers to this and it's baffling that people idolize that idiot. He is a magician and he promises free speech then shadowbans people he doesn't want seen. He's like RFK and Trump. He's the "hero" the conservatives are in search of. Ever see any videos about Albert Pike (33rd degree fm) and his book morals and dogma written over 150 years ago. It's the plan of the satanists to take over the world. We are living in the matrix and the truth in my humble opinion is that if we don't accept the free gift of salvation Jesus offers, we are turned into the energy for the rising of the locusts from the pit of hell.

Expand full comment

I found this substack article to be extremely disappointing. But even some of the sharpest people can be naive with respect to certain issues.

Expand full comment

While reading the article, I wondered if AMD's mind had been infiltrated!

Expand full comment

It is rumored the Pentagon has Terminator-like 'robots' that might be unleased on our own people.

Expand full comment

Yeah, space travel is like any military spending. Very expensive for what it actually gives back. It also requires a lot of energy and rare minerals.

Thanks, forgot to mention this regarding another aspect of his ideology. Neuralink (and other brain interfaces):

https://posthumousstyle.substack.com/p/neuralink-does-not-read-minds-and

Expand full comment
Nov 3·edited Nov 3

Manned space travel is expensive and unnecessary. And yeah, it's probably all being pushed by the MIC.

Properly funded unmanned probes (funded enough so that they succeed) and space telescopes are fine with me.

Expand full comment

PArson the father of NASA said space exploration and occultism are two faces of the same coin

Expand full comment

AMD, thank you for another tremendous article.

I really value you citing Elon Musk as an example. His creativity shows that he consistently outthinks his competitors-- bravo, Mr. Musk! I heartily recommend Matthew Fox's fascinating book, "Creativity: Where the Divine & Human Meet" for many reasons not the least of which is it will inspire anyone's creative spirit.

I also appreciate your exposing Gates' "nasty" behavior, the media's suppression of the truth, and last but Not least, the evil Pharma attempts to confer on us through poisonous vaccines and drugs that harm.

I will never forget that Gates' MS-Word software sabotaged and prevented a PC user from using Word Perfect! By the time this issue came to Court, Word Perfect, which HAD been the premier word processing software, had become bankrupt. Elon Musk's behavior is classy whereas that of Gates is anything but, especially how he he has touted vaccines with great enthusiasm as eventually "lowering the world's population by 15%!" The C-19 vaccines have indeed caused much death in our country and the world.

As for Pharma, I have previously mentioned how Dr. Bryan Ardis's book ("Moving Beyond the COVID-19 Lies: Restoring Health & Hope for Humanity") exposes how Snake Venoms (chiefly from the King Cobra snake and the Chinese krait snake) were put into COVID-19 vaccines; how Snake Venom results in myocarditis, MH issues, turbo cancers, Long Covid, and a MYRIAD of OTHER health issues; and lastly, how he uses the last third of his book to share all the solutions to all the C-19 issues.

One is the nutrient nicotine (pyrazine chemicals are the addictive culprit Big Tobacco puts into cigarettes). He found that nicotine reduced one person's Glioblastoma by 72%, that a nicotine patch eliminates every single Long Covid symptom AND also EJECTS Snake Venom from the nicotinic receptor sites!

I remain suspicious why Amazon Remains sold out of "Moving Beyond" for 4 straight weeks but you can order it from www.thedrardisshow.com (and I have ZERO fiduciary interest in promoting this or any other book.)

Lastly, a question: AMD, have you ever read "And Nothing Happened...But You...Can Make it Happen" by Steven A. Ross? He lists all the effective medical and health technologies that have been purposely kept from the public. (I'm almost done it).

Yes, he has a chapter on Dr. Royal Raymond Rife but profiles a number of other medical innovators such as Dr. Bjorn Nordenstrom, Georges Lakhovsky, and others. For instance, I had never known about "Color Therapy" to heal others (such as burn victims) and do so painlessly!

I am Angry at all the suppression but there will always be a few, including you, AMD, to blast out the truth! I always appreciate you doing that.

"Always tell the truth", said President Harry S. Truman, "that will astonish some, and gratify the rest."

Expand full comment
author

At some point I will write about Lakhovsky's work.

Expand full comment

Wow-- I can't wait!

Expand full comment
author

I loved word perfect!

Expand full comment

I did too, AMD. When I think of Gates (which I don't consciously do) I get angry.

Anger is the proper response to perceived or real injustice/unfairness. Of course, its energy must be expressed constructively, which is why I write so damn much because I'm filled with HOLY RAGE!

Expand full comment

Greg, Did you actually receive the physical book from Dr. Ardis' site? We've had it on order from Azon for a couple months but they are stonewalling it.

I'll check out the Ross book. Thanks for the tip.

Also waiting for AMD's book, which I hope will be forthcoming when he finishes the DMSO series. Please, Doc?

Expand full comment

AMD, I didn't know you were writing a book, that's great!

If you are not, consider putting your entire DMSO series in book form, consider putting the links as footnotes, have a friend or attorney (not your own) serve as an intermediary with the publisher to preserve your anonymity, and publish away!

I would buy several copies because that's how valuable your information is.

Consider Harvest Creek Publishing & Design as your publisher.

Thank you for your consideration.

Expand full comment

Hi Jim,

Yes, I received the physical book from Dr. Ardis's site: www.thedrardisshow.com.

My 'spidey' sense tells me that the PTB (the powers that be) told Amazon NOT to restock it because I can't understand why it would take more then FOUR WEEKS to PRINT NEW COPIES!

With ALL that DEMAND for it??? Why WOULDN'T a publisher drop EVERYTHING and spend 72-hours CRANKING THEM OUT?

Come ON!!!

I believe the book at Dr. Ardis's site is $24.95 which Amazon JACKED UP to $29.92! If you order 3 or 6 copies, you receive a price break at Dr. Ardis's site.

I believe that Amazon is DECEIVING people with that jacked-up price and stringing us along. I could be wrong, but they offer no clarification other than 'more books are on the way'. BULLCRAP!

The book came out the last week of September (2024). It sold out somewhere between October 7th and October 10th.

You will need a Defibrillator while READING this book, that's how SHOCKING its truth IS!

Let me know what YOU think, Jim.

I'd ask Amazon for a refund on an UNdelivered book and then apply that refund to purchasing one at Dr. A's site. This book deserves every reward and it literally will Blow You Away. I'm not exaggerating. Thanks, Jim.

Expand full comment
18 hrs ago·edited 15 hrs agoLiked by A Midwestern Doctor

Wow. I did not know about Bleeding Kansas. I hope that history is taught in Kansas schools. It needs to be known. Those who know their history can see more clearly what it means for today. All the J6ers who were arrested for their dissent, just like those in Kansas. Are we going to end up with bloodshed? We may see soon enough.

Expand full comment

If you want to deconstruct US History with Truth using source documents, I highly suggest the work of Michael Gaddy. He has a Substack now to access his works and is highly worth the subscription!! @rebelmadman

https://rebelmadman.substack.com?r=1b28cx&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=profile

The Civil War was about slavery but not like you think!

Expand full comment

I always figured the primary reason we had the Civil War was to keep the country together, and the secondary reason was to end slavery. I've often wondered what this land would be like if Lincoln had allowed the southern states to secede. I know they'd eventually have freed the slaves, like the rest of the world did (mostly). I wonder if there's an alt-history book with that premise.

Expand full comment

Not healthcare related, but there was a time a few decades ago we could fly NYC to London in 2.5 hours. In the same era, jet planes were large (4 engines) and transatlantic flight was pleasant. Now we are stuffed into smaller planes, smaller seats, smaller meals. The point is, we had the technology but we are going backwards. Like many other fields of existence.

Also - I am very leery of Musk's AI robots. I believe they will become vessels for demonic entities.

Expand full comment

I detest the whole robot thing. And throw the space-hoopla in the same bag. We have no clue how to inhabit this planet and so we'll just go plunder others? Insane.

Expand full comment

I was all in on the principles of this piece. But then came the excitement about robots building communities for humans - here on Earth or elsewhere. Babel comes to mind. "Ye will be like gods." In the words of Ian Malcom, “Scientists are actually preoccupied with accomplishment. So they are focused on whether they can do something. They never stop to ask if they should do something.”

Expand full comment
author

Musk is the only person in the AI field advocating for ethics with AI

Expand full comment

Ethics with AI.

If we haven't been able to manage ethics with God given intelligence, I have to wonder how artificial will handle it.

And, frankly, I have no desire for Mr. Musk, or anyone else, to dictate, create or otherwise manipulate my ethics.

This was a very interesting article, but I believe Musk, Soror, Gates, among others, are just the faces for the powers calling the shots.

I wish I believed otherwise, but I don't.

Expand full comment

AI is like stealing real intelligence from billions of people to amplify it for taking advantage over those same billions individually! Based on theft of data and privacy and intellectual property!

Expand full comment

Judith-

“If we haven't been able to manage ethics with God given intelligence, I have to wonder how artificial will handle it.”

Excellent and spot on response!! Thank you!

Expand full comment

lol , where do you get all this conviction about him from?? hopefully you know better when preaching your DMSO religion, as this is just a minor thing in the sea of other very helpful things

Expand full comment
Nov 3·edited Nov 3

This is a tough one. Your knowledge and writings are incredible, and I always appreciate your insights. But I'm having trouble with your increasing "Trump" talk in only positive terms, ignoring the negative. Same with Musk now that he's joined team Trump. Just one example: "The hostile media coverage Trump received throughout his presidency was the primary factor responsible for this rapid decline in public trust in the media." This is ridiculous as many, many people were plenty happy to see him get negative media coverage and still lost trust in the media. In fact I would argue many lost trust because of his positive media coverage from Fox and other far right new sources, and for others it had nothing to do with him and instead was from Covid coverage and censorship.

I guess I'm just tired of everyone with a platform extolling the virtues of one side or the other without acknowledging both sides of the story (and there's always the other side given the one-sidedness of the opinions), or acknowledging that both candidates/parties are deeply flawed and have sold out to commercial interests. (By necessity probably, since our political system has been almost destroyed by the amount of money it takes to get elected.)

I, like many, have gotten to the point now where I don't care anymore. I don't live in a swing state so my vote doesn't even matter. I'm just trying to focus on love for all humanity and see where that gets me.

Expand full comment
author

If you look at the graph I showed about public trust in the media, once it was split by party, it supports the arguments I made. Likewise, I have highlighted his issues in other posts. My primary focus here is on RFK Jr, and I would argue you are seeing something in different in this than what I'm actually stating.

Expand full comment

The Dems dropped from 75% to 58% trust in media in 5 years. That's pretty big for a party of which the majority still have heard almost nothing true about Covid.

Expand full comment
author

That drop happened after the COVID vaccines came out. The drop with Republicans happened after Trump. The way the COVID vaccines were marketed was very similar to how the media attacked Trump, so initially the Republicans rejected the vaccines while the Dems took them, but since so many people opposed what would have typically been something everyone trusted the media and got, dissident messages were able to be widely heard, and then once the vaccines completely failed to perform as promised, people on the left started listening and lost their trust in the media. That's what I saw happen and that's what the data shows. I do not believe the loss in trust came from people being upset with Fox news. The left has always disliked fox news (and for most of my life I did too) so I do not believe that had anything to do with a sudden massive and unprecedented drop in trust in the media. It's just that in recent years, fox news was the only station which was willing to air anything which challenged the pharmaceutical industry so they became the only station I ever watched.

Expand full comment

I sure hope President Trump knows the real truth Dr. Ardis published: that big pharma companies intentionally put Snake Venom in Covid-19 vaccines to depopulate the planet.

I get sick when I see signs for "Free COVID-19 Shots" and "Free Flu Shots".

Never surrender your critical and analytical thinking skills, my friends!

Anything like that that is "Free" comes with a huge price: ultimately, death.

Expand full comment

I have 2 sisters-in-law who are still getting the damned Covid boosters.

It's not clear to me how people actually thought about the whole Covid mess. when it was happening and how they think now. Vinay Prasad insists that the mandates affected only a few, that most people had already taken the vaccine. I have also read otherwise.

Expand full comment
Nov 4·edited Nov 4

My SIL almost died in the hospital. Not from Covid but remdisivir and a vent. Still, her state job hounded her to get the jab in order for her to keep her job and get all her pension. It was evil and corrupt and I truly want to pound people over the head to make them understand what really went on. They look at you like I have 3 heads. My sister hounded me, insulted me and disowned me. She finally talked to me but wants people who are still hurting and suffering to “get over it”. I had to block her because she is now so trump deranged she just parrots the CNN sound bites and lies. Calls everyone not like her haters. When trump wins, I don’t want to be anywhere around her. She will NEVER see the truth. I pray something changes. The statistics show via insurance, etc. that 15 million died from the jab weapon. I cant even put into words or thought how so many cannot see this fraudulent world around them. They will die staying blind. Vinay is blind as well. He just can’t totally in his heart and mind accept that his medical gods are actually killing people. For money, power and thrills. But they are.

Expand full comment

Vinay always assumes that clinical trials are legit, unless shown otherwise.

Expand full comment

the vent approach and covid treatment was 180 degrees of what should have been done!! they should have stabilized the pH in the blood! so the oxygen would return back to normal in mostly three days, they were killing people!! becasue doctors can not THINK! ALL of them including this AMD are full of VANITY!...they want that money and status, and playing mini Gods! they never learn from patients , i guess that is human, but hey you support these fake solutions with your votes or money :) so it is not all of their fault. the same as Musk, someone has been buying Teslas!?? Tesla Co. was bankrupt for the most of the first 6 years or more!

Expand full comment

I'm so sorry, Janet, that you sister-in-law died from Remdesivir.

Dr. Bryan Ardis's book EXPOSES the lies surrounding Remdesivir: it killed 53% of 175 women and children in Africa in an EBOLA trial which Anthony Fauci funded (he is no longer a "Doctor" to me, I would be insulting AMD to put Fauci in AMD's vocational class) whereas the EBOLA Mortality Rate is 50%!

Remdesivir is MORE deadly than EBOLA!

Anthony Fauci KNEW this when he destructively joined with the FDA to PROMOTE Remdesivir "For Compassionate Use For COVID-19 Patients" as its maker, Gilead and Fauci put it.

A week later, the WHO condemned Remdesivir but MOST U.S. doctors believe the FDA EVERY SINGLE TIME they APPROVE something without first QUESTIONING IT and doing the Research Dr. Ardis did!

Consider having your family filing a Class Action lawsuit suing the makers of Remdesivir (Gilead), Fauci, the FDA, and every pharma company whose vaccines contain Snake Venom. With a warrior attorney, you should win hands down.

When they offer you $35 million or another outrageous sum to settle out of Court, don't take it because your beloved sister-in-law was worth an INFINITE amount of money. Tell those people where to shove it.

You will be in my prayers. I hope you and your family find healing. Discern in prayer if you are being called to sue the aforementioned parties.

Expand full comment

As Dr. Ardis explains, the "booster" shot has in it the other half of the plasmid that makes the Snake Venom proteins KILL the person.

I told many from the beginning of the Scamdemic: "If I can SCARE you, I can CONTROL you!"

I suspect fear motivates your 2 beloved sisters-in-law to get "the damned Covid boosters" married with unquestioned trust of what "they" tell you.

Maybe you can have a family movie night and show John Carpenter's great film, "THEY LIVE".

Expand full comment

My sisters-in-law seem to think the Covid boosters are like flu shots. They want to get them so they don't come down with Covid.

I live in San Francisco and there are still quite a number of people here wearing masks. The other day I saw a person with a mask on who was also wearing a cap. On the cap was a patch that said "Obey".

Some people are so dense, they don't even understand They Live.

Expand full comment

To my mind, the most powerful counterweight to the media monopoly is right here: the Internet, and venues like Substack. Podcasting is also eroding that monopoly. I couldn't believe it when I read Joe Rogan's Trump interview got something like 34 million downloads! Big media is in its death throes, which it thoroughly deserves. (I've mentioned elsewhere that it's game over if the 2 formerly most prestigious papers are now commonly referred to as the NY Slimes and the Washington Compost.) Protecting free speech is the First Amendment for a very good reason, and we need the Second Amendment to protect it!

Expand full comment

Strictly speaking “astroturfing” is the creation and deployment of a *fake grass roots* organisation. Which then may well engage in the tactics you describe.

Thanks again for another powerful essay.

Expand full comment
author

That's a good, I should make that distinction in the future (its always a tricky balance between having everything be completely correct and not having it have excessive amounts of detail)

Expand full comment

"The best road is not necessarily the most interesting." The Rave I'Ching

This perspective seems overly simplistic. It seems we've traded our innate connection to nature with a synthetic connection to technology, by which we've become deluded that we're more connected to nature.

Most are not aware of Global Cycles - 412-year planetary epochs that influence life on Earth through the precession of the equinox. According to this view, 2027 marks the end of our current cycle, which has emphasized community building and social planning as foundations for our current civilization. The next cycle is so starkly different, as it is fundamentally individual. Put shortly, we're in for a societal collapse. (https://kingofhearts.substack.com/p/global-cycles-part-ii)

This impending transition manifests in our current approach to challenges. Rather than addressing fundamental issues, we've developed an almost reflexive dependence on technological shortcuts and "life hacks," seeking ways to circumvent rather than confront core problems.

Nowhere is this more evident than in our infrastructure crisis - a silent but growing problem affecting urbanized nations worldwide. Roads, bridges, tunnels, and buildings are deteriorating at an accelerated pace, lacking proper maintenance and attention.

The solution isn't particularly mysterious or innovative. It requires what it has always required: methodical organization, prudent resource management, and committed effort - the very things that seem to have fallen out of fashion in our rush toward digital solutions. These fundamental needs get postponed indefinitely because they lack the allure of technological novelty.

Instead, we pour resources into developing apps that calculate insignificant data in insular technological vacuum bubbles, such as: carbon footprint of our everyday choices or monitor our sleep patterns with unprecedented precision. It's worth asking: what value does the most sophisticated navigation app provide when the infrastructure it guides us to is crumbling?

While visionaries like Elon Musk deserve recognition for challenging conventional thinking, there's a deeper critique to be made about the direction our technological development is taking. The distinction becomes clear when we examine the difference between responding to genuine planetary needs and pursuing innovation primarily for historical recognition.

Consider electric vehicles - a telling example of our approach to innovation. Few realize that electric vehicles were actually among the first automobiles developed in the early 20th century. This historical fact raises profound questions about our current perception of electric cars as “revolutionary” technology. What we're seeing is actually a repackaging of century-old concepts, marketed as innovation to a society that has become increasingly uncritical of technological promises.

This becomes even more significant when we consider the more pressing innovations needed here on Earth, particularly in the energy sector. Free energy, for instance, has been proven viable years ago, with the necessary theoretical and mathematical frameworks already established by pioneers like Nikola Tesla, James Maxwell and Thomas Bearden.

Yet these potentially transformative technologies have been historically sidelined by established industry interests. (nothing surpasses the medical racket, but the energy racket does come close to it. I suggest you consider doing a post on that).

In this context, Tesla's position in the technological landscape becomes particularly intriguing. While marketed as an automotive company, it's more accurately understood as a technology enterprise using electric vehicles as a platform for data collection and AI development - ultimately serving broader ambitions like Mars colonization. But again, this raises a crucial question about the direction of our technological capabilities and whether they're being channeled toward our most pressing needs.

The Mars colonization endeavor itself exemplifies this misalignment. Musk's dismissal of population crisis concerns while simultaneously pushing for Mars colonization reveals a peculiar prioritization. The fundamental challenges of such an endeavor often go undiscussed - our bodies evolved specifically for Earth's conditions, its gravity, atmospheric pressure, and protective magnetic field. Adapting to Mars's radically different environment presents profound biological challenges that can't be easily engineered away.

.

.

Second, is our monetary system.

It's interesting that in the "20th century healthcare" graph you posted, the time it begins to spike up is exactly at the same time the U.S. has departed forever from the gold standard. This shift marked the transition to a debt-based monetary system - a model that fundamentally altered how we exchange value and energy in our economy.

I've noticed that in many of your posts you have a tendency to portray wealth disparity in an overly subjective way, not really accounting for foundational basis. However, in my view it's crucial to avoid oversimplifying the discussion of wealth inequality.

While wealth disparities are real and significant, reducing them to simple narratives of villains and victims misses the deeper structural complexities. Such oversimplification is often aligned with political rhetoric that encourages people to externalize responsibility and channel their frustrations outward.

The reality is more nuanced: wealthy individuals aren't necessarily malevolent orchestrators of inequality, nor are those with less means simply victims. Rather, most participants in this system - regardless of their financial status - are operating within and responding to these broader structural constraints.

This debt-based system, by its very design, rather than simply facilitating exchange, it establishes a framework where continuous debt creation becomes necessary for economic function, potentially contributing to wealth concentration through systemic mechanisms. All, until it implodes within itself.

This monetary architecture might warrant more urgent attention than ambitious projects like Mars colonization. Perhaps our innovation priorities should include developing more transparent and equitable systems of exchange?

.

.

Last but not least: AI.

Artificial Intelligence is so overhyped and seems to be overshadowing more fundamental concerns (perhaps, this reflects the fact that human beings have lost the art of discernment and contemplation - the byproduct of being tethered to a technological pacifier 24/7).

There's a profound irony here: AI systems, as sophisticated as they may appear, ultimately mirror their creators' mental states and limitations. This creates an interesting feedback loop - our scattered, distracted consciousness manifests in the technologies we develop, which in turn reinforces these same patterns in society. We're witnessing a decline in quality control and product longevity that mirrors our own collective exhaustion. This fatigue shows up in what we create: products that prioritize novelty over reliability, flash over substance.

ChatGPT serves as a particularly telling example of this phenomenon. Despite being notoriously error-prone, it commands a staggering $86 billion valuation simply because it represents something new and exciting. This presents an intriguing paradox: while society expresses concern about misinformation from individual sources, we're simultaneously celebrating and investing heavily in systems capable of generating inaccuracies at an unprecedented scale.

Another example is "smart" vehicles. We're creating cars loaded with sophisticated features that often create more problems than they solve. What's the value of real-time data analytics when replacement parts take months to arrive? How does an automatic braking system that occasionally misidentifies objects truly enhance safety? We're adding layers of complexity that often negate the very benefits they're meant to provide.

The medical field presents another striking example. While we pour resources into developing sophisticated robotic surgery systems, we're experiencing unprecedented increases in chronic illness, mental health issues, and medical complications. The fundamentals of preventive medicine take a back seat to more "exciting" technological solutions.

.

.

In conclusion, what's particularly concerning is our reluctance to address existing technological shortcomings before pushing forward with AI and other advanced systems. Instead, we're caught in a cycle of FOMO that prevents us from consolidating our gains and fixing what's already broken.

The thread running through all these technological discussions - whether about AI, monetary systems, or space exploration - inevitably leads us back to a fundamental truth: the challenges we face aren't primarily technological but human in nature. The real issue seems to be humanity's increasing disconnection from itself, rather than any particular technological limitation or innovation.

P.S.

Regarding your coverage of Elon Musk being on the spectrum, there appears to be a tension between presenting this neurological condition as a positive attribute while simultaneously characterizing autism as a disorder in other contexts. And so I'm curious, how do you reconcile that?

Expand full comment

I agree! So many other important problems that need to be addressed & fixed. Mars colonization seems wasteful. What is the real reason?

Expand full comment

One reason may be to have a viable bug-out destination.

For example, Biden came very close in September to authorizing long-range missiles for Ukraine. The idiot neocons have taken over the current apparatus, and they have no problem escalating to nuclear war.

Expand full comment

I was walking home on Saturday in NYC with my 27 year old vaccine injured son with Autism. We have a routine where we eat lunch near the jugglers at the NY Public Library on 5th Avenue on Saturday's after his Broadway Theater class. We were sitting next to three Asian women who were Medical students, and the conversation was almost entirely about the process of getting through school rather than the content in school. It is quite sad that I would never trust these women now as "Doctors". They were really nice, probably excellent memorization skills, good grades, good families, and completely useless - to me. Without arrogance, I simply know more than them (with my not-MD wife as the family doctor) - https://karmahouse.substack.com/p/pro-vaccine-safety-in-2023-where

Along with Alex Berenson's comments on vaccines over the weekend, it put me on a Twitter/X tear on Saturday night (was not drinking), and I am now suspended on X. Here was my basic premise:

____________________________

"I would like to see vaccines removed from the children’s schedule and have them be optional. I am not pulling them away from anyone - just optional with genuine rather than Pharma funded "informed consent".

Repeal the 1986 Vaccine Act and ban direct to consumer advertising. Allow consumers to take pharmaceutical companies to court the same way that we can take McDonald’s to court for a hot coffee. The market will correct itself in a year or two and we will be back to a better path for a healthy nation. Radical stuff right !!??"

______________________________

AMD - My wife is packing for Florida as I type. She worked on Bobby Kennedy's senior team on the campaign, and she is headed to re-calculate how we move forward as a family to heal our son's life. We have to stop this damage to children. It is overwhelming society, and that prevents us as a family from finding a long term solution for our son. I have used your Autism article dozens of times (https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-do-vaccines-cause-autism) , but "Doctors" dismiss it as being some "Quack". We both know that word was created by Rockefeller Medicine. I have "critical thinking" skills, but you have BOTH the technical and critical thinking skills.

My second attempt - please consider posting with your REAL identity.

Genuine thanks

Mike Sweeney

Hiking Leader, Father to Dustin, & Son of an Infectious Disease MD

#AeternusUmbra (Eternal Shadow)

Expand full comment
founding

guess that shows how liberated and "non-censoring" "X" really is - the perfect label for a platform that cancels commenters.

Expand full comment

I was "determined", but not radical. It was probably a good wake up call. I am still in the penalty box, so..... let's see what happens!!

Thanks

Dustin's Dad

Expand full comment