Horton's WHO has no access to my 1969 Webster's Third New International Dictionary, but is welcome to change its internal definition of anything in any manner it like. I don't hear it. Don't exaggerate.
"An epidemic of unusual extent and severity" (def. 2) needn't necessarily entail enormous numbers of deaths. Pandemic with no illness? Do you refer to the PCR-assisted, "asymptomatic" fake illness? Paul Craig Roberts does not approve of that message!
To repeat, "the WHO changed the definition"
Horton's WHO has no access to my 1969 Webster's Third New International Dictionary, but is welcome to change its internal definition of anything in any manner it like. I don't hear it. Don't exaggerate.
"An epidemic of unusual extent and severity" (def. 2) needn't necessarily entail enormous numbers of deaths. Pandemic with no illness? Do you refer to the PCR-assisted, "asymptomatic" fake illness? Paul Craig Roberts does not approve of that message!
CDC also changed their definition. So by your definition if we have colds all over the globe, we have a pandemic of colds?
The Seedy Sea also doesn't have access to my dictionary.
Yes, colds are usually a pandemic.