Horton's WHO has no access to my 1969 Webster's Third New International Dictionary, but is welcome to change its internal definition of anything in any manner it like. I don't hear it. Don't exaggerate.
"An epidemic of unusual extent and severity" (def. 2) needn't necessarily entail enormous numbers of deaths. Pandemic with no illness? Do you refer to the PCR-assisted, "asymptomatic" fake illness? Paul Craig Roberts does not approve of that message!
According to the classical (real) definition of a pandemic, Covid should not have been a pandemic. It was a pandemic of protocol murders.
" Cohen and Carter state that the WHO changed the definition of an
influenza pandemic by excluding reference to the words "with enormous
numbers of deaths and illness."
What the article fails to state is that the WHO made two changes; the
second change was to drop the requirement for a new sub-type with a simple
reassortant virus meaning that many seasonal flu viruses could be
classified as pandemic influenza."
A pandemic with much mortality is a "plague". Let's not exaggerate terms.
To repeat, "the WHO changed the definition"
Horton's WHO has no access to my 1969 Webster's Third New International Dictionary, but is welcome to change its internal definition of anything in any manner it like. I don't hear it. Don't exaggerate.
"An epidemic of unusual extent and severity" (def. 2) needn't necessarily entail enormous numbers of deaths. Pandemic with no illness? Do you refer to the PCR-assisted, "asymptomatic" fake illness? Paul Craig Roberts does not approve of that message!
CDC also changed their definition. So by your definition if we have colds all over the globe, we have a pandemic of colds?
The Seedy Sea also doesn't have access to my dictionary.
Yes, colds are usually a pandemic.