10 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Den Arto's avatar

It hit me, Its all about the vaccines. There cant be a serious pandemic. A fatal bug doesnt get transmitted. A contagious bug isnt a killer or it would die out with the host. They hype the pandemic 1) using bogus testing 2) kill people by mandated treatment protocols 3) fear monger in media. Then sell the final solution, the vacs.

The "exceptions": Spanish flu killed probably due to bad small pox vacs given to soldiers and overdosing with the new aspirin. Plagues up until the mid-1800s killed due to bad hygiene, water, etc. With decent nutrition and hygiene we wont see another real epidemic, unless the Covid vacs destroyed everyone's immune system.

Expand full comment
Baga's avatar

JJ Couey at a recent Red Pill conference shared his thoughts that the pandemic was all about getting the jabs in arms and making sure the young believed in pandemics so they could be controlled by fear inspired by government. Couey made a convincing argument.

Expand full comment
Den Arto's avatar

They also wanted to make the unsuccessful mRNA jabs an acceptable warp speed "vaccine" technology, by redefining what a vaccine was.

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

It was a pandemic, perhaps a variant series of them. Pandemics aren't usually commonly fatal; how many people die of colds, chickenpox, or herpes? How covids were spread, whether person to person, or something else, remains in question.

Expand full comment
Den Arto's avatar

According to the classical (real) definition of a pandemic, Covid should not have been a pandemic. It was a pandemic of protocol murders.

" Cohen and Carter state that the WHO changed the definition of an

influenza pandemic by excluding reference to the words "with enormous

numbers of deaths and illness."

What the article fails to state is that the WHO made two changes; the

second change was to drop the requirement for a new sub-type with a simple

reassortant virus meaning that many seasonal flu viruses could be

classified as pandemic influenza."

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

A pandemic with much mortality is a "plague". Let's not exaggerate terms.

Expand full comment
Den Arto's avatar

To repeat, "the WHO changed the definition"

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

Horton's WHO has no access to my 1969 Webster's Third New International Dictionary, but is welcome to change its internal definition of anything in any manner it like. I don't hear it. Don't exaggerate.

"An epidemic of unusual extent and severity" (def. 2) needn't necessarily entail enormous numbers of deaths. Pandemic with no illness? Do you refer to the PCR-assisted, "asymptomatic" fake illness? Paul Craig Roberts does not approve of that message!

Expand full comment
Den Arto's avatar

CDC also changed their definition. So by your definition if we have colds all over the globe, we have a pandemic of colds?

Expand full comment
SaHiB's avatar

The Seedy Sea also doesn't have access to my dictionary.

Yes, colds are usually a pandemic.

Expand full comment