Thank you! Finally, someone mentions that 2018 Hotez article "Crafting Your Scientist Brand." I try to cite it in every substack article that mentions his name. It just doesn't seem like something a legitimate scientist ought to be focusing on.
"Hotez worked very hard to brand himself as a scientific celebrity (to the point he even wrote a paper about how he’d done it) so he could be an ambassador of science." I'm sure he likes the attention, but since he went on a publicity tour in 2019 to praise the gloriousness of vaccines, perhaps an equal if not greater motivation was protecting the funding flow for his tropical vaccine Institute.
As for not wanting to debate RFK, you "can empathize with why he is terrorized by the thought anyone might look into what he did." That, charitably, would imply he's capable of feeling guilt (doubtful) or is afraid of legal consequences. Personally, I think he's more afraid of the resulting "irrelevance and mockery" if he lost such a debate. And of course loss of $$$.
I really appreciate you sending me that article. I was in disbelief when I first read it and I have been referencing it ever since. I am pinning your comment since you should be recognized for digging that up (Hotez writes so much it's hard to go through all of his work).
Actually I ran across it in another comment months ago. As for his prodigious output, no doubt churning out (easy and) fairly worthless articles is part of his branding strategy. Get a load of this one—If you read the short article, it's rather impressive how he managed to stretch enough connections to make it sound vaguely plausible.
Anything's better than sending actual food, or whatever.
PS You never know if/when(?) its current open-access status is slated to be revoked. Hence it won't hurt to click the Download on the right, and secure a nicely formatted pdf. For posterity 😉
I do download PDFs of things that I consider important, because so much stuff, especially in scientific journals, tends to become unavailable, even through sci-hub.
It’s a tragedy that idiotic psychopaths such as Hotez end up being in positions of power. So much of that going around. For a long time, of course. I grew up assuming that people in powerful, high positions of authority were ‘good’ and ‘intelligent’ with a moral compass. Nope. I was wrong. A painful yet vital life lesson.
Wow, that's a great contribution to bring attention to that article, Tardigrade. Of course no legitimate scientist should ever think in such a way. You're right, psychopaths don't feel terror like normals do, he has plenty of practical reasons for avoiding debate. Starting with, he knows he's lying, and he enjoys getting away with lying. Any debate jeopardizes that. He's certainly not stupid, just evil. I feel sorry for his child, he did nothing to deserve being damaged. As to Hotez, I'm glad he suffers having a damaged child. I hope he gets shingles tomorrow. Followed by cancer. Followed by tinnitus, cluster headaches, and a severe back injury, all at the same time. I don't think that makes me bad, I just recognize who are our enemies are and where they come from.
Dunno about the terror, but my understanding is that the main trait of psychopaths is that they don't feel empathy. I think they also tend to be arrogant, and that could easily prevent any feeling of terror or fear.
You are correct, that is the most defining characteristic. It's important to remember our understanding of psychopathy is imperfect. Most all the early work that really defined the conventional understanding of it was done working with incarcerated or institutionalized people, since those populations are so much easier to study. Hervey Cleckley was the pioneer who really jump-started our understanding of it. His subjects were in a mental institution. Robert Hare, the second most influential person in the earlier days (and maybe he still is, I haven't kept up that much over the last decade or so) studied criminals in prison. Our knowledge of highly functioning psychopaths has grown a lot since them, but like all of psychology, it's imperfect to say the least. They do not feel shame or remorse. Ever notice how so many politicians have such a thick skin? They can be humiliated in such ways that a normal person would want to crawl into a hole and hide, yet they are completely unfazed. That's an extremely valuable trait for a politician, or anyone aspiring to claw his way to the top of any institution. They have a LOT of advantages, including that their traits are very attractive to normals, who gravitate towards "leaders" who show "strength" and unwavering confidence. It's also important to understand that, while there are plenty of full-blown psychopaths whose brains function quite differently and feel absolutely no empathy, guilt, or shame, no matter what, it exists on a spectrum and there are plenty of "near-psychopaths" who are often high-functioning. I don't succumb to the temptation to call them sociopaths, I believe in calling a spade a spade. Some say the two are not the same, it's possible to define them differently, but there's really no need, it unnecessarily complicates understanding the phenomenon.
I poked around one day to try to find out the difference between a sociopath and a psychopath. Different authorities have different definitions, so there is no one definitive definition, so to speak.
My working definition is that sociopathy is a spectrum, with psychopathy at one extreme end.
I must confess that my introduction to psychopaths was Jon Ronson's book The Psychopath Test. Admittedly Ronson is mostly a humorist (so the book is a very enjoyable read) but if the experiences in the book are true, he did serious research and went all over the world visiting various psychopaths in prisons, mostly.
I've read more about it since then, and next up on my list is Political Ponerology, which looks much more daunting.
More daunting is an understatement! Reading twice won't get it with Łobaczewski, it takes more passes than that, for me at least. Worth it though for sure. Sounds like you're on the right track. It's not possible to understand how things work, and why they are as they are, without a good understanding of psychopathy, including how normals react. Re psychopath/sociopath, it's a pointless discussion IMO. The condition, its degrees, how it manifests in different individuals, how it affects others, is what matters. Sure you can come up with some guidelines and stick on different labels. I don't see any point to doing that, it just causes confusion for absolutely no reason.
I agree that getting tangled up in semantic weeds is counterproductive. As you say, the effect is what matters. My mental model is useful in that I can imagine how sociopaths game various systems (government, industry, science) to their advantage, and the real psychopaths tend to rise to the top, like cream. Or maybe scum is a better word.
Hotez blocked me on Twitter. For some weird reason, he took issue with me posting that he was a medical whore who sold his soul to shill for Pharma and governments. 😂😂 I posted this on someone else’s tweet, not even addresses to Hotez, and he saw it.
Oh, yeah, I also happened to mention he has no integrity, honor or ethics. I guess he didn’t like that, either. 🤔
Since 2015 I've been in the fight and this is THE MOST FUN and exciting time many of us have EVER experienced. These idiots are fully exposed to their lies right now. Let the GAMES CONTINUE!!
Glad your able to enjoy, to me they've gone beyond mere hypocrisy to Gas lighting and to " They know they're lying. We know they're lying. They know we know they're lying and they're laughing at us."
Sadly there is no 'I' in her full name, but you could have called her a 'DNA manacled whore' as this is an anagram of her name. You could have had plenty of other suitable phrases.
Hotez hasn't only been consistently wrong the past 3 yrs. He's been LYING. Here's an example: https://youtu.be/dUwJkM3gJwM Vaccinated herd immunity was NEVER possible w. a non-sterilizing vax that didn't provide much if any of a SigA mucosal immune response for a respiratory virus. So the two things Hotez excels at are gas lighting & moving goal posts.
Hotez blocked me on Twitter as well. I honestly can’t recall what I might have done directly towards him, but undoubtedly it was some reporting of truth or calling him out for his past lies. 🤔🤷♂️
The only time I ever see his face is when the couple of substacks I read post videos of him. There have been a lot of those posts lately. I feel he has become a distraction, replacing worthy news.
Not if you consider the likelihood the Power Structure is gearing up for another "pandemic" so it can demand even more draconian obedience. The WHO has practically said as much. There was also a flurry of "alternative medicine is quackery" activity on Twitter before the Hotez thing broke, and Big Pharma is trying to get the FDA to require alternative medicines be subjected to the same effectiveness criteria it no longer has to provide.
Then those items need to be at the forefront, with healthy, countering arguments and discussions. Winning the battle is not harping on just one pigeon disseminating their talking points.
Every time I see him my flesh crawls, and I recently figured out why. I realized he looks like the mugshot of the host of a kids educational show who just got arrested upon discovery of his kiddie porn dungeon--and even now, he's not just unapologetic but proud of it even while being booked. That gross pervy sadistic grin with the down turned face and upturned eyes....*shudder*.
Considering his crimes against humanity including children (plus his giddy fawning fandom of another famous torturer of children, Tony "The Science" Fauci) and how proud and unapologetic he is, that's not far off the mark.
I don’t totally understand the contraction stuff but it sounds interesting and valid. What I don’t embrace in general is the public demurring out of misplaced politeness or supposed compassion and refusing to examine our vaccine program. The childhood vaccine schedule has tripled since the 1986 no-liability act went into effect. Over 50 percent of American kids now has a chronic illness. Silence at this point is not niceness or politeness or compassion. Silence is complicity.
I guess not. But when we are still giving hep b shots to neonates and have the highest day one death rate, you have to wonder, how much time do we have?
Uhhhh…I read and respect your posts. I just do not trust many physicians anymore and big pharma can…You know what I want to say; but, won’t. Very Best, Ed
Somehow I missed the voices of hatred on this substack over the last 6 months. Hatred soils the heart and clouds the mind's focus; so yes, not very productive.
Yes, evil. “Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.” --Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Hotez is near the top of the list of awful people who need to be outed and disclosed for the idiot grifters they are. They are all owned by Big Pharma. They have no interest in real science. The conflicts of interest are incredible. Thank you for contributing to that effort.
I don’t know who I have more contempt for, Hotez or Gorski. They’re both repulsive sociopaths, Gorski is 1/1000th as successful as Hotez and at least he had the courtesy to not reproduce.
But watching Hotez soil his pants so publicly on Twitter in front of millions has been glorious
I do really hope so. Interesting that the details about him have arrived and exploded. As details emerge I wonder what will happen to all the stored material of those treating him so well and praising his work. I was always a bit disturbed by his pronouncements.
The truth cannot be told, it has to be realized. ~Ralph Smart
It’s fascinating to see the top of the pyramid crumbling before our eyes, and these imposters still thinking they have us fooled. Many of us have known the truth for more than 2 years.
Please protect yourself at all costs and beware of wolves in sheep’s clothing. You don’t need to use someone else’s platform to share this information for more views. Your audience is awake and aware, and the more you are your true authentic self, the more we will trust you. Continue to be the lighthouse and shine your light on the truth.
Just so you know Dr, you have surpassed the ‘likes & comments’ less than a day later…of whom you asked to share this a day earlier, before you published yourself. We TRUST you more and I too am a Midwesterner (from Nebraska).
This is because we follow a timeline similar to WW 2 only 80 years ago. In 1943 the Germans were being pushed back. Today it is the germ men.
I consider the USA also follows a timeline 160 years ago. July 1-3 was the Battle of Gettysburg 1863. It was a pivotal battle in the American Civil War.
Hotez is a real "Ho" selling worse than just toxic information in order to make a buck. His use of the word Science, when referring to vaccines is absolutely rotten. There is nothing scientific about injecting toxic substances into the human body...and declaring they will provide immunity. If the medical profession had any knowledge about natural immunity and the manner in which the lymphatic system work...they would see that it would be impossible to create immunity by injecting poisonous substances directly into the bloodstream. If the substance was arsenic...it would be called murder, but what has been used for many decades is in the same realm...and what is being used today is no better.
He's been working on helminths for a long long time. I found this especially interesting because at one point I considered deliberately infecting myself with helminths to treat an autoimmune condition. Helminthic therapy is actually a thing, and works for a lot of people.
Nah. Per the claims of a certain vax zealot relative, the same would apply to arsenic that applies to mercury: its a special kind of arsenic with an entirely different atomic structure and its already in our bodies every day in huge quantities far surpassing any in vaccines, it being a vital nutrient necessary for our health and in no way toxic.
Anything you put in a vaccine is always by definition good, healthy and necessary. Because vaccines are so miraculous that anything toxic put in them is automatically transformed into a safe substance merely by word "vaccine" on the label. Place a drop of any vaccine into a vat of sulfuric acid and marvel at how the entire vat becomes safe and effective! Truly this is potent god-stuff they wish to give us and we are simply ungrateful fascist children with violent tendencies for asking so many questions.
Brilliant expose of Hotez, and I loved the section about contracting, and how one should be focusing on being open instead of closed. My daughter is studying for her TCM so I have been fortunate in learning from her also....Chinese Medicine is fascinating. I am hopeful that more and more people are waking up to all of the liars amongst us.
MwD... Insightful post, but sympathy has limits. Adolf Hitler had a wretched family life and life experiences, too, and one can certainly argue reasonably that those things shaped that man. But, those things unleashed a monster. Most historical despotic figures have similar backgrounds. Does any of that absolve them of their crimes against Humankind? No.
Hotez falls into the same group of damaged souls that veer toward evil instead of steering their trauma experience into serving Humankind.
He is pitiable. I predict an early and unhappy end for the man.
I would suggest that it is crucial to distinguish between sympathy and empathy. The latter can bring powerful clear-seeing, but does not imply approval.
One man's monster is another's savior, I suppose. But, Hitler gave himself over to hate of the other at the expense of his own humanity. Was it worth the price? He ended his years as a broken man and died at his own hand (unless he did make it to Argentina) - delirious from drugs prescribed by his favorite doctor, a horrible diet, and, I am certain, PTSD from childhood and WWI. He was surrounded by murderous sycophantic psychopaths, grifters and charlatans (like so many politicians in the West today). Any good that he may have done for the people of Germany was cancelled by mad ethnocentrism, racism, revenge, and mass murder on an industrial scale. Another "Time" Man of the Year! Today, he would probably have been awarded a Nobel Peace Prize a la O'bomber.
There's also a report from Russia, which has no reason to lie about it, that a DNA test on the remains they snatched up from Hitler's bunker indicate it was him.
Affirmed. Hitler was sincere. It's been said he was influenced by Darwin's theory which spawned eugenics. Nasty stuff indeed! But he was convinced. Now, fast-forward to current. Do these political and industrial mobsters believe they are "doing good"? Could there be a correlation between the two mindsets? (theirs and Adolph's) Does planet earth require their "managing" input to remain as our "sustainably viable" home? It appears that they actually think so. To kill, maim, create chaos in order to achieve their illicit agenda, seems to be somehow acceptable to them, "for the good of all," as is their deceptive motto.
Don't forget it was the man who essentially invented fascism who said it should be more properly called "corporatism" because it's the merger of state and corporate power. And Wolin observed 6 years ago we've mainly lived under inverted totalitarianism for most of the country's history.
All roads lead to Rome! To lay blame elsewhere without considering her, is a misstep in ones understanding. Most of her un-sifted written history, still able to be acquired, proves her complicity in world domination affairs. Worse yet, is her prideful, open admission that Papal Rome is the Mother church who claims the "Protestant" churches are NO sisters of hers, rather they are wayward "daughters" which are finally being called back into her good graces~! "UNITY" is her clarion call to them. "Unify" under her direction and blasphemous, paganized, doctrines and rituals.. Or else!
More resembling a badger hole, than that of a rabbit, it's big, deep, and extremely dangerous to delve into. It's occupant is well-equipped to do serious battle with any intruders of its domain, which by her own admission, is world-wide in scope! It is this entity's militant work force which has penetrated EVERY system, every institution of the world's society, with which we do battle unawares.
That Hoetz guy, (cannot bear to put Dr in front of his name) I genuinely thought was a sideshow and I often wondered if he obtained his degree online. THANK YOU for pointing out and supporting with evidence that he was in on the chimeric virus as well. I have only had Baric and the bat lady in my sights, but this deserves much further investigation. He just doesn’t seem that “smart” to me to be working on a SARS vaccine project.
I also wanted to Thank You for your recommendations for the supplements I am currently taking while I titrate off my SSRI’s. They are making a difference :)
I don't think what drives Hotez is too difficult to figure out. Much like Michael Mann of global warming alarmism fame, these guys were both likely wildly unpopular during school and are enjoying their new-found popularity too much to have it ended by something as mundane as the truth. They can get their revenge on the world and have popularity at the same time.
Just yesterday I posted following on different site. Peter Hortz; (correction Hotez) Professor, MD, PhD. Assume he teaches (Professor), and has leaning beyond High School (MD, PhD). He may be a nice man. (Regret I said that) However, in that he’s trying to debunk JFK Jr’s heavily documented position’s on certain vaccines and COVID’s experimental chemical concoctions (ECC) as “misinformation”, then one can validly wonder how Hotez ever gained his PhD.
The man is blind to not only lack of efficacy of the ECC’s but their apparent actual negative efficacy beyond 90 days, as he blames hundreds of thousands of deaths for being unvaccinated. I consider him dangerous. Good example of not automatically believing whatever someone says, just because that person has initials after their name. Hotez will never debate JFK Jr live on any platform, as Hotez would be annihilated with bomb loads of documented facts. My opinion, He is making a donkey’s butt out of himself.
Confidentially, embarrassed by my sarcasm used, but serious that JFK Jr would wipe out Hotez with how thorough former is with research. Truly disgusted with the use of “misinformation” for anything anti-narrative - with never being specific.
Thank you! Finally, someone mentions that 2018 Hotez article "Crafting Your Scientist Brand." I try to cite it in every substack article that mentions his name. It just doesn't seem like something a legitimate scientist ought to be focusing on.
"Hotez worked very hard to brand himself as a scientific celebrity (to the point he even wrote a paper about how he’d done it) so he could be an ambassador of science." I'm sure he likes the attention, but since he went on a publicity tour in 2019 to praise the gloriousness of vaccines, perhaps an equal if not greater motivation was protecting the funding flow for his tropical vaccine Institute.
As for not wanting to debate RFK, you "can empathize with why he is terrorized by the thought anyone might look into what he did." That, charitably, would imply he's capable of feeling guilt (doubtful) or is afraid of legal consequences. Personally, I think he's more afraid of the resulting "irrelevance and mockery" if he lost such a debate. And of course loss of $$$.
I really appreciate you sending me that article. I was in disbelief when I first read it and I have been referencing it ever since. I am pinning your comment since you should be recognized for digging that up (Hotez writes so much it's hard to go through all of his work).
Actually I ran across it in another comment months ago. As for his prodigious output, no doubt churning out (easy and) fairly worthless articles is part of his branding strategy. Get a load of this one—If you read the short article, it's rather impressive how he managed to stretch enough connections to make it sound vaguely plausible.
Anything's better than sending actual food, or whatever.
"Malnutrition vaccines for an imminent global food catastrophe" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463047/
It was mentioned in a YouTube video series about Hotez at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lVbMCVlpkY
journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000024 <-- Crafting Your Scientist Brand, the said 2018 Hotez article in PLoS Biology.
Let's make it easier to share 😊
PS You never know if/when(?) its current open-access status is slated to be revoked. Hence it won't hurt to click the Download on the right, and secure a nicely formatted pdf. For posterity 😉
I do download PDFs of things that I consider important, because so much stuff, especially in scientific journals, tends to become unavailable, even through sci-hub.
It’s a tragedy that idiotic psychopaths such as Hotez end up being in positions of power. So much of that going around. For a long time, of course. I grew up assuming that people in powerful, high positions of authority were ‘good’ and ‘intelligent’ with a moral compass. Nope. I was wrong. A painful yet vital life lesson.
Nice guys finish last.
"Good men do not desire to rule their fellow men."
The main reason we do not find good men as our rulers. That, and power corrupts, and power attracts the corrupt.
Wow, that's a great contribution to bring attention to that article, Tardigrade. Of course no legitimate scientist should ever think in such a way. You're right, psychopaths don't feel terror like normals do, he has plenty of practical reasons for avoiding debate. Starting with, he knows he's lying, and he enjoys getting away with lying. Any debate jeopardizes that. He's certainly not stupid, just evil. I feel sorry for his child, he did nothing to deserve being damaged. As to Hotez, I'm glad he suffers having a damaged child. I hope he gets shingles tomorrow. Followed by cancer. Followed by tinnitus, cluster headaches, and a severe back injury, all at the same time. I don't think that makes me bad, I just recognize who are our enemies are and where they come from.
Dunno about the terror, but my understanding is that the main trait of psychopaths is that they don't feel empathy. I think they also tend to be arrogant, and that could easily prevent any feeling of terror or fear.
You are correct, that is the most defining characteristic. It's important to remember our understanding of psychopathy is imperfect. Most all the early work that really defined the conventional understanding of it was done working with incarcerated or institutionalized people, since those populations are so much easier to study. Hervey Cleckley was the pioneer who really jump-started our understanding of it. His subjects were in a mental institution. Robert Hare, the second most influential person in the earlier days (and maybe he still is, I haven't kept up that much over the last decade or so) studied criminals in prison. Our knowledge of highly functioning psychopaths has grown a lot since them, but like all of psychology, it's imperfect to say the least. They do not feel shame or remorse. Ever notice how so many politicians have such a thick skin? They can be humiliated in such ways that a normal person would want to crawl into a hole and hide, yet they are completely unfazed. That's an extremely valuable trait for a politician, or anyone aspiring to claw his way to the top of any institution. They have a LOT of advantages, including that their traits are very attractive to normals, who gravitate towards "leaders" who show "strength" and unwavering confidence. It's also important to understand that, while there are plenty of full-blown psychopaths whose brains function quite differently and feel absolutely no empathy, guilt, or shame, no matter what, it exists on a spectrum and there are plenty of "near-psychopaths" who are often high-functioning. I don't succumb to the temptation to call them sociopaths, I believe in calling a spade a spade. Some say the two are not the same, it's possible to define them differently, but there's really no need, it unnecessarily complicates understanding the phenomenon.
I poked around one day to try to find out the difference between a sociopath and a psychopath. Different authorities have different definitions, so there is no one definitive definition, so to speak.
My working definition is that sociopathy is a spectrum, with psychopathy at one extreme end.
I must confess that my introduction to psychopaths was Jon Ronson's book The Psychopath Test. Admittedly Ronson is mostly a humorist (so the book is a very enjoyable read) but if the experiences in the book are true, he did serious research and went all over the world visiting various psychopaths in prisons, mostly.
I've read more about it since then, and next up on my list is Political Ponerology, which looks much more daunting.
A sociopath is a pavement or sidewalk wide enough for two people to walk along side by side.
A psychopath is crazy paving. :)
More daunting is an understatement! Reading twice won't get it with Łobaczewski, it takes more passes than that, for me at least. Worth it though for sure. Sounds like you're on the right track. It's not possible to understand how things work, and why they are as they are, without a good understanding of psychopathy, including how normals react. Re psychopath/sociopath, it's a pointless discussion IMO. The condition, its degrees, how it manifests in different individuals, how it affects others, is what matters. Sure you can come up with some guidelines and stick on different labels. I don't see any point to doing that, it just causes confusion for absolutely no reason.
I agree that getting tangled up in semantic weeds is counterproductive. As you say, the effect is what matters. My mental model is useful in that I can imagine how sociopaths game various systems (government, industry, science) to their advantage, and the real psychopaths tend to rise to the top, like cream. Or maybe scum is a better word.
Hotez blocked me on Twitter. For some weird reason, he took issue with me posting that he was a medical whore who sold his soul to shill for Pharma and governments. 😂😂 I posted this on someone else’s tweet, not even addresses to Hotez, and he saw it.
Oh, yeah, I also happened to mention he has no integrity, honor or ethics. I guess he didn’t like that, either. 🤔
Since 2015 I've been in the fight and this is THE MOST FUN and exciting time many of us have EVER experienced. These idiots are fully exposed to their lies right now. Let the GAMES CONTINUE!!
Glad your able to enjoy, to me they've gone beyond mere hypocrisy to Gas lighting and to " They know they're lying. We know they're lying. They know we know they're lying and they're laughing at us."
DR. GASLIGHT. A doctor causes his patient to question her own sanity. Listen to Turfseer’s new song. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/dr-gaslight
And we are laughing at them. I am anyway.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/04/12/more-memes/
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/03/11/macbeth-the-three-witches-scene/
Sure! As we cut lengths of rope!
Ray
Well, that's weird. Of course, a few years ago, I was banned for life a millisecond after I called Rachel Maddow a media whore.
Sadly there is no 'I' in her full name, but you could have called her a 'DNA manacled whore' as this is an anagram of her name. You could have had plenty of other suitable phrases.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/12/02/rachael-maddow-u-s-a-television-news-program-host-and-liberal-political-commentator/
It’s over, Peter is his own enemy now - https://youtu.be/Sj6-QDVYbv8
Hotez hasn't only been consistently wrong the past 3 yrs. He's been LYING. Here's an example: https://youtu.be/dUwJkM3gJwM Vaccinated herd immunity was NEVER possible w. a non-sterilizing vax that didn't provide much if any of a SigA mucosal immune response for a respiratory virus. So the two things Hotez excels at are gas lighting & moving goal posts.
He's a grifter; grifters always lie
He has a daughter with Autism, and it is really hard for me to post this. I DEFEND Autism families as my life mission - https://www.endeavor21.org
It sucks on so many levels...
Did you read the post I wrote explaining why his daughter had a vaccine injury?
I cannot like this post…So, So Sad…But, Very Best, Ed
Edit - I hung a punching/kicking bag. It helps. At 56, I’m still fast even though C-19 kicked my azs 2/2020.
Maybe, can you post the link? Thanks
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/why-does-peter-hotez-think-we-are
Once I saw this story I quickly knocked out a column ...
Regarding the Great Kennedy vs. Hotez Debate that won't happen ... If you are scared Dr. Hotez (and you are), say you're scared.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/the-great-debate-that-wont-happen
Great work Bill!
BTW, Doc. I hope you saw my Q & A with "Transcriber B." She mentions your site as one of her "go to" places to post and get good links.
Thank you, Doc!
Yes, nicely done BR Jr!!!
He is probably a member of Clowns In Action.
Certainly looks the part!
Much less has earned a block from the great Dr. Hotez
Don't hold back. Tell us what you really think of him. 😉
😂😂
Most soulless retard /rethread heads have the exact same mindset.
The forbidden inquiry and the ass-umptions of correctness run strong in this group.
Stupid is as stupid does. Gump-ism
No one is hated more than he who speaks the truth.
in times of universal decit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act- orwell
Hotez blocked me on Twitter as well. I honestly can’t recall what I might have done directly towards him, but undoubtedly it was some reporting of truth or calling him out for his past lies. 🤔🤷♂️
He blocked me and I never even messaged him or commented on one of his posts.
That’s funny It made Me smile and laugh. Ed
Now, that's being proactive! 😝
I got so sick of seeing his smarmy face and having his self-glorifying crap show up on my feed I blocked HIM. 🤣
The only time I ever see his face is when the couple of substacks I read post videos of him. There have been a lot of those posts lately. I feel he has become a distraction, replacing worthy news.
Not if you consider the likelihood the Power Structure is gearing up for another "pandemic" so it can demand even more draconian obedience. The WHO has practically said as much. There was also a flurry of "alternative medicine is quackery" activity on Twitter before the Hotez thing broke, and Big Pharma is trying to get the FDA to require alternative medicines be subjected to the same effectiveness criteria it no longer has to provide.
Then those items need to be at the forefront, with healthy, countering arguments and discussions. Winning the battle is not harping on just one pigeon disseminating their talking points.
As a walking talking example of the corruption of the current government-Pharma complex, he's useful for raising awareness of it.
It may be partially a distraction, but also worthwhile news considering he's a possibility to be Fauci's replacement.
On the other hand, maybe that's a deliberate rumor to increase the palatability of the eventual (no doubt equally horrible) choice.
Smarmy! That's a good descriptor!
Every time I see him my flesh crawls, and I recently figured out why. I realized he looks like the mugshot of the host of a kids educational show who just got arrested upon discovery of his kiddie porn dungeon--and even now, he's not just unapologetic but proud of it even while being booked. That gross pervy sadistic grin with the down turned face and upturned eyes....*shudder*.
Considering his crimes against humanity including children (plus his giddy fawning fandom of another famous torturer of children, Tony "The Science" Fauci) and how proud and unapologetic he is, that's not far off the mark.
Lol
I don’t totally understand the contraction stuff but it sounds interesting and valid. What I don’t embrace in general is the public demurring out of misplaced politeness or supposed compassion and refusing to examine our vaccine program. The childhood vaccine schedule has tripled since the 1986 no-liability act went into effect. Over 50 percent of American kids now has a chronic illness. Silence at this point is not niceness or politeness or compassion. Silence is complicity.
I completely get how you feel, believe me I do; I just don't think hatred is the most effective way to right these wrongs.
I guess not. But when we are still giving hep b shots to neonates and have the highest day one death rate, you have to wonder, how much time do we have?
Uhhhh…I read and respect your posts. I just do not trust many physicians anymore and big pharma can…You know what I want to say; but, won’t. Very Best, Ed
Wow…Reasonable Discourse… What an oddity. 😁
Completely understand; thank you.
Somehow I missed the voices of hatred on this substack over the last 6 months. Hatred soils the heart and clouds the mind's focus; so yes, not very productive.
And cowardice.
and evil.
Yes, evil. “Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.” --Dietrich Bonhoeffer
AMD has written quite a lot about vaccines.
Talking about the public
You're right. I didn't read your comment carefully enough.
Or as aids activists used to say, when they clamoured for a voice amongst hate and lies: Silence=Death
It's willful ignorance.
Hotez is near the top of the list of awful people who need to be outed and disclosed for the idiot grifters they are. They are all owned by Big Pharma. They have no interest in real science. The conflicts of interest are incredible. Thank you for contributing to that effort.
Thank you.
Here is a twelve-minute mini-documentary on Hotez, exposing his shifting positions and other awkward connections:
https://twitter.com/VacSafety/status/1670491516593397760?s=20
Credit: Jeff Childers Coffee & Covid substack: https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/
I don’t know who I have more contempt for, Hotez or Gorski. They’re both repulsive sociopaths, Gorski is 1/1000th as successful as Hotez and at least he had the courtesy to not reproduce.
But watching Hotez soil his pants so publicly on Twitter in front of millions has been glorious
Hotez is probably the best example I've ever seen of "sunshine is the best disinfectant"
I do really hope so. Interesting that the details about him have arrived and exploded. As details emerge I wonder what will happen to all the stored material of those treating him so well and praising his work. I was always a bit disturbed by his pronouncements.
Indeed, light in the darkness. Cockroaches exposed for what they really are.
Awesome post, T-bat!
Hotez is so obviously insane that he is probably a useful recruiter to the "vaccines may be a serious problem".
Vaccines are a serious problem of course, or as I like to put it, pointless at best.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/what-is-the-flu-aka-covid-19-and
It was incredible to watch Joe Rogan’s reaction during the Hotez interview. His bullshit antenna was visibly twitching.
The truth cannot be told, it has to be realized. ~Ralph Smart
It’s fascinating to see the top of the pyramid crumbling before our eyes, and these imposters still thinking they have us fooled. Many of us have known the truth for more than 2 years.
That's exactly how I feel; it's a bit surreal this is happening.
Please protect yourself at all costs and beware of wolves in sheep’s clothing. You don’t need to use someone else’s platform to share this information for more views. Your audience is awake and aware, and the more you are your true authentic self, the more we will trust you. Continue to be the lighthouse and shine your light on the truth.
Just so you know Dr, you have surpassed the ‘likes & comments’ less than a day later…of whom you asked to share this a day earlier, before you published yourself. We TRUST you more and I too am a Midwesterner (from Nebraska).
This is because we follow a timeline similar to WW 2 only 80 years ago. In 1943 the Germans were being pushed back. Today it is the germ men.
I consider the USA also follows a timeline 160 years ago. July 1-3 was the Battle of Gettysburg 1863. It was a pivotal battle in the American Civil War.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/02/07/timeline-anticipated-events-in-world-war-3/
Hotez: "Sometimes I just don't get it right."
Rogan: "How often?"
That's the real question right there: How often do you not get it right? And what else might you not have gotten right?🤔
I am curious if he's made more incorrect statements about COVID-19 on national television than anyone else.
Just posted this above, but it bears reposting: https://rumble.com/v2txe80-peter-hotez-vaccine-expert.html
I believe that despite a career in developing vaccines, he's never had one be a success.
It is quite impossible for a vaccine to be a success. Poisoning people has never been good for health.
Unless you are referring to big pharma etc. making large sums of money.
Hotez is a real "Ho" selling worse than just toxic information in order to make a buck. His use of the word Science, when referring to vaccines is absolutely rotten. There is nothing scientific about injecting toxic substances into the human body...and declaring they will provide immunity. If the medical profession had any knowledge about natural immunity and the manner in which the lymphatic system work...they would see that it would be impossible to create immunity by injecting poisonous substances directly into the bloodstream. If the substance was arsenic...it would be called murder, but what has been used for many decades is in the same realm...and what is being used today is no better.
His saga with the hookworm vaccine is an excellent example.
He's been working on helminths for a long long time. I found this especially interesting because at one point I considered deliberately infecting myself with helminths to treat an autoimmune condition. Helminthic therapy is actually a thing, and works for a lot of people.
Nah. Per the claims of a certain vax zealot relative, the same would apply to arsenic that applies to mercury: its a special kind of arsenic with an entirely different atomic structure and its already in our bodies every day in huge quantities far surpassing any in vaccines, it being a vital nutrient necessary for our health and in no way toxic.
Anything you put in a vaccine is always by definition good, healthy and necessary. Because vaccines are so miraculous that anything toxic put in them is automatically transformed into a safe substance merely by word "vaccine" on the label. Place a drop of any vaccine into a vat of sulfuric acid and marvel at how the entire vat becomes safe and effective! Truly this is potent god-stuff they wish to give us and we are simply ungrateful fascist children with violent tendencies for asking so many questions.
Your work is very special, thank you for this article Doc!
Thank you.
Thank you. There is a treasure of wisdom in this.
Thank you.
Brilliant expose of Hotez, and I loved the section about contracting, and how one should be focusing on being open instead of closed. My daughter is studying for her TCM so I have been fortunate in learning from her also....Chinese Medicine is fascinating. I am hopeful that more and more people are waking up to all of the liars amongst us.
Thank you
Please show this to her!
MwD... Insightful post, but sympathy has limits. Adolf Hitler had a wretched family life and life experiences, too, and one can certainly argue reasonably that those things shaped that man. But, those things unleashed a monster. Most historical despotic figures have similar backgrounds. Does any of that absolve them of their crimes against Humankind? No.
Hotez falls into the same group of damaged souls that veer toward evil instead of steering their trauma experience into serving Humankind.
He is pitiable. I predict an early and unhappy end for the man.
Sad.
I would suggest that it is crucial to distinguish between sympathy and empathy. The latter can bring powerful clear-seeing, but does not imply approval.
Very important point.
Yes. I actually am empathetic in these situations. Good point.
Given his health, I expect an early end for him too.
Why was he a monster?
One man's monster is another's savior, I suppose. But, Hitler gave himself over to hate of the other at the expense of his own humanity. Was it worth the price? He ended his years as a broken man and died at his own hand (unless he did make it to Argentina) - delirious from drugs prescribed by his favorite doctor, a horrible diet, and, I am certain, PTSD from childhood and WWI. He was surrounded by murderous sycophantic psychopaths, grifters and charlatans (like so many politicians in the West today). Any good that he may have done for the people of Germany was cancelled by mad ethnocentrism, racism, revenge, and mass murder on an industrial scale. Another "Time" Man of the Year! Today, he would probably have been awarded a Nobel Peace Prize a la O'bomber.
Look into some revisionist history. the Institute for Historical Review is good.
Tomatobubble, or realhistorychannel is good. Mike King's The Bad War is good.
The Synagogue of Satan is a good book. Reed's books were good. The Nameless War was good.
The interviews by Walther White were good. The speech by Mr. Freeman was good.
There are things you should unlearn, then other things you should learn TnDoc.
I believe he escaped to Argentina. ALOT of factual proof.
There's also a report from Russia, which has no reason to lie about it, that a DNA test on the remains they snatched up from Hitler's bunker indicate it was him.
I read DNA was his assistant.
Affirmed. Hitler was sincere. It's been said he was influenced by Darwin's theory which spawned eugenics. Nasty stuff indeed! But he was convinced. Now, fast-forward to current. Do these political and industrial mobsters believe they are "doing good"? Could there be a correlation between the two mindsets? (theirs and Adolph's) Does planet earth require their "managing" input to remain as our "sustainably viable" home? It appears that they actually think so. To kill, maim, create chaos in order to achieve their illicit agenda, seems to be somehow acceptable to them, "for the good of all," as is their deceptive motto.
Don't forget it was the man who essentially invented fascism who said it should be more properly called "corporatism" because it's the merger of state and corporate power. And Wolin observed 6 years ago we've mainly lived under inverted totalitarianism for most of the country's history.
All roads lead to Rome! To lay blame elsewhere without considering her, is a misstep in ones understanding. Most of her un-sifted written history, still able to be acquired, proves her complicity in world domination affairs. Worse yet, is her prideful, open admission that Papal Rome is the Mother church who claims the "Protestant" churches are NO sisters of hers, rather they are wayward "daughters" which are finally being called back into her good graces~! "UNITY" is her clarion call to them. "Unify" under her direction and blasphemous, paganized, doctrines and rituals.. Or else!
More resembling a badger hole, than that of a rabbit, it's big, deep, and extremely dangerous to delve into. It's occupant is well-equipped to do serious battle with any intruders of its domain, which by her own admission, is world-wide in scope! It is this entity's militant work force which has penetrated EVERY system, every institution of the world's society, with which we do battle unawares.
May the God of Creation guide your journey,
Ray
Well said Ray. Badger hole is a nice touch!
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/06/10/666/
That Hoetz guy, (cannot bear to put Dr in front of his name) I genuinely thought was a sideshow and I often wondered if he obtained his degree online. THANK YOU for pointing out and supporting with evidence that he was in on the chimeric virus as well. I have only had Baric and the bat lady in my sights, but this deserves much further investigation. He just doesn’t seem that “smart” to me to be working on a SARS vaccine project.
We owe the source who sent that tidbit to me (they wanted to stay anonymous).
I also wanted to Thank You for your recommendations for the supplements I am currently taking while I titrate off my SSRI’s. They are making a difference :)
I don't think what drives Hotez is too difficult to figure out. Much like Michael Mann of global warming alarmism fame, these guys were both likely wildly unpopular during school and are enjoying their new-found popularity too much to have it ended by something as mundane as the truth. They can get their revenge on the world and have popularity at the same time.
Many people think this; the problem is I can't prove it so I haven't asserted it as fact.
Definitely psychopathy going on there.
Just yesterday I posted following on different site. Peter Hortz; (correction Hotez) Professor, MD, PhD. Assume he teaches (Professor), and has leaning beyond High School (MD, PhD). He may be a nice man. (Regret I said that) However, in that he’s trying to debunk JFK Jr’s heavily documented position’s on certain vaccines and COVID’s experimental chemical concoctions (ECC) as “misinformation”, then one can validly wonder how Hotez ever gained his PhD.
The man is blind to not only lack of efficacy of the ECC’s but their apparent actual negative efficacy beyond 90 days, as he blames hundreds of thousands of deaths for being unvaccinated. I consider him dangerous. Good example of not automatically believing whatever someone says, just because that person has initials after their name. Hotez will never debate JFK Jr live on any platform, as Hotez would be annihilated with bomb loads of documented facts. My opinion, He is making a donkey’s butt out of himself.
Pretty much!
Confidentially, embarrassed by my sarcasm used, but serious that JFK Jr would wipe out Hotez with how thorough former is with research. Truly disgusted with the use of “misinformation” for anything anti-narrative - with never being specific.