"In many ways they are vaccines." & "They used the vaccine brand to sell an experimental gene therapy, so the brand deserves to pay the price." - the reasoning behind these two statements is so convoluted it shocks me. This is not about BRANDING or some so-called THERAPY - it is about poisons, distributed to billions of innocent people under the guise of health care. Good luck with your SubStack. I am unsubscribing once again.
Hi Steve, I believe you misunderstood AMW regarding the words “brand” and also experimental gene “therapy.” AMD wrote this article so that this fraud and harm will never happen again, so it seems to me that clearly AMD is in agreement that this was a terrible pharmaceutical in your words ..”distributed to billions of innocent people under the guise of health care.” The word “brand” is referencing the company… ie Moderna/etc. and AMD said the “brand” (company) should be held accountable for the barm they did. As I read AMD, regarding the words gene “therapy,” the purpose of these drugs was for therapeutic benefit. So AMD using the word “therapy”to me, does not mean AMD is saying the experimental gene “therapy” was/is any benefit for mankind.
Correct. Removing the vaccine liability shield should solve the vaccine problem. The manufacturers will pull them from the market in a heartbeat. Anyone who still wants a vaccine can always sign an individual liability waiver with the manufacturer. The dog needs to start wagging the tail again, and not the other way around. Freedom, not mandates!
Our view was that:
•In many ways they are vaccines.
•They used the vaccine brand to sell an experimental gene therapy, so the brand deserves to pay the price.
The second point is more important.
Great point. Branding matters.
"In many ways they are vaccines." & "They used the vaccine brand to sell an experimental gene therapy, so the brand deserves to pay the price." - the reasoning behind these two statements is so convoluted it shocks me. This is not about BRANDING or some so-called THERAPY - it is about poisons, distributed to billions of innocent people under the guise of health care. Good luck with your SubStack. I am unsubscribing once again.
Peace.
Steve, we need each other! Remember they want us divided.
Call it an experimental gene therapy-vaccine hybrid.
Come on man!
Just a play on words.
Not ALL places are appropriate for being an absolutist.
Continued.. sentences seem to be dropping off… does not mean AMD is saying the “therapy” was positive and a benefit..
Hi Steve, I believe you misunderstood AMW regarding the words “brand” and also experimental gene “therapy.” AMD wrote this article so that this fraud and harm will never happen again, so it seems to me that clearly AMD is in agreement that this was a terrible pharmaceutical in your words ..”distributed to billions of innocent people under the guise of health care.” The word “brand” is referencing the company… ie Moderna/etc. and AMD said the “brand” (company) should be held accountable for the barm they did. As I read AMD, regarding the words gene “therapy,” the purpose of these drugs was for therapeutic benefit. So AMD using the word “therapy”to me, does not mean AMD is saying the experimental gene “therapy” was/is any benefit for mankind.
Correct. Removing the vaccine liability shield should solve the vaccine problem. The manufacturers will pull them from the market in a heartbeat. Anyone who still wants a vaccine can always sign an individual liability waiver with the manufacturer. The dog needs to start wagging the tail again, and not the other way around. Freedom, not mandates!
Poignant