Rather than trace the illusions of Covid-19 to the powerful entities and actors who have dictated and enforced The Science™ from the very beginning (Breggin & Breggin, 2021; Kennedy Jr., 2021; Broudy & Hoop, 2021; Broudy & Arakaki, 2020; Davis, 2022; Robinson, 2022), reappearing to steer the operation at every turn (Anderson et al., 2022…
Rather than trace the illusions of Covid-19 to the powerful entities and actors who have dictated and enforced The Science™ from the very beginning (Breggin & Breggin, 2021; Kennedy Jr., 2021; Broudy & Hoop, 2021; Broudy & Arakaki, 2020; Davis, 2022; Robinson, 2022), reappearing to steer the operation at every turn (Anderson et al., 2022; Hughes, 2022b; Knightly, 2022; Loffredo & Blumenthal, 2021a, 2021b; Loffredo & Webb, 2020a, 2020b, 2020c; Mercola, 2022c; Rockefeller Foundation, 2022; Stieber & Trigoso, 2022; Vandiver, 2022; WHO, 2021), The Psychology of Totalitarianism maintains that populations have primarily their own neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses to blame. We, the victims of mass deception, are encouraged to turn the critical lens on ourselves, to contend with our own foolish naïveté.-- this conclusion essentially supports my thesis.
It makes no sense to blame neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses ala Freud of those who were forcefully locked down by authorities, arrested for being outside, beaten for being maskless, in some countries sealed in their homes or removed to camps, or forced to choose between having a job and feeding their familes or unemployment. That was atrocity: it can and is being resisted. That some people who were fooled by this and continue to hold to it should examine their actions in this? Sure.
Adding: You suggest looking at foreign policy or actions. There are cycles everywhere, from the universe down to the individual physical level. War has a definate cycle, as do nations, economics, and pandemics. Many of these have been linked to Pi. The WEF, in particular, is attempting to use cycles to affect the nature and outcome of a major one we are in right now, hence their 2023 goal, about where a new cycle begins. While humanity may not be able to stop a cycle, it may be possible to adjust its strength and direction. I do not, however, believe or credit Desmet for intuiting this as it is not part of his discussion. No doubt all the actions of a group affect the cycles, not just neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses.
We're agreeing. I fully understand the critical perspective the authors take toward the strategy to psychologize a top-down atrocity. As stated above, politicians are not the top, rather actors to take the heat should the public push back. Meanwhile, the Rockefellers, Davos crowd, and other social engineers with money powers remain completely off the radar. Elected officials and promoters reside essentially at the second tier of strata outlined in the article.
I would say that they are not off the radar. There are many here who see what is going on and are working to resist them. I think, also, if enough politicians see there are consequences for their behavior, it will chill their compliance.
It seems to me that the the legal shell game of whey they avail themselves complicates efforts to hold them to any account. Thence, most attention is directed toward "elected" officials who themselves are afforded a measure of immunity.
Rather than trace the illusions of Covid-19 to the powerful entities and actors who have dictated and enforced The Science™ from the very beginning (Breggin & Breggin, 2021; Kennedy Jr., 2021; Broudy & Hoop, 2021; Broudy & Arakaki, 2020; Davis, 2022; Robinson, 2022), reappearing to steer the operation at every turn (Anderson et al., 2022; Hughes, 2022b; Knightly, 2022; Loffredo & Blumenthal, 2021a, 2021b; Loffredo & Webb, 2020a, 2020b, 2020c; Mercola, 2022c; Rockefeller Foundation, 2022; Stieber & Trigoso, 2022; Vandiver, 2022; WHO, 2021), The Psychology of Totalitarianism maintains that populations have primarily their own neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses to blame. We, the victims of mass deception, are encouraged to turn the critical lens on ourselves, to contend with our own foolish naïveté.-- this conclusion essentially supports my thesis.
It makes no sense to blame neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses ala Freud of those who were forcefully locked down by authorities, arrested for being outside, beaten for being maskless, in some countries sealed in their homes or removed to camps, or forced to choose between having a job and feeding their familes or unemployment. That was atrocity: it can and is being resisted. That some people who were fooled by this and continue to hold to it should examine their actions in this? Sure.
Adding: You suggest looking at foreign policy or actions. There are cycles everywhere, from the universe down to the individual physical level. War has a definate cycle, as do nations, economics, and pandemics. Many of these have been linked to Pi. The WEF, in particular, is attempting to use cycles to affect the nature and outcome of a major one we are in right now, hence their 2023 goal, about where a new cycle begins. While humanity may not be able to stop a cycle, it may be possible to adjust its strength and direction. I do not, however, believe or credit Desmet for intuiting this as it is not part of his discussion. No doubt all the actions of a group affect the cycles, not just neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses.
We're agreeing. I fully understand the critical perspective the authors take toward the strategy to psychologize a top-down atrocity. As stated above, politicians are not the top, rather actors to take the heat should the public push back. Meanwhile, the Rockefellers, Davos crowd, and other social engineers with money powers remain completely off the radar. Elected officials and promoters reside essentially at the second tier of strata outlined in the article.
I would say that they are not off the radar. There are many here who see what is going on and are working to resist them. I think, also, if enough politicians see there are consequences for their behavior, it will chill their compliance.
It seems to me that the the legal shell game of whey they avail themselves complicates efforts to hold them to any account. Thence, most attention is directed toward "elected" officials who themselves are afforded a measure of immunity.
Good chatting have a great week.