While there are hidden interests, leaders are not puppets. They are willing agents of whatever idea or group they choose, whether it is the people, financial or political interests or some belief. To say leaders are puppets is to absolve them of any responsibility for their actions, particularly when they commit atrocities. That they are…
While there are hidden interests, leaders are not puppets. They are willing agents of whatever idea or group they choose, whether it is the people, financial or political interests or some belief. To say leaders are puppets is to absolve them of any responsibility for their actions, particularly when they commit atrocities. That they are puppets of some outside force is the notion put forth by Desmet's mass formation, which has no science behind it nor does it comport with reality. https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/11/investigative-reports/covid-19-mass-formation-or-mass-atrocity/
Thanks for such an eloquent response. I can see that one may conclude that leaders should not be held to account, but that's not what I'm saying. The scope of political discourse is vary narrowly contained, all while oligarchic initiatives get carried out usually under the radar. The control of media, academy, politicians, and courts is obfuscated through rituals and discourse that makes us believe that we are active participants in as opposed to the subjects of. Between the interests of secret societies and the money making powers of these shadowy forces, the idealized function of social institutions and governance is a highly dubious notion. Holding politicians may have some palliative effect, but it fails to strike at the core of the problem we're facing.
"Overnight, the public face of science was transformed from a civil and civilian endeavor into a matter of law and order."-- This statement, for example, is naive. Science journals are held by one entity (source not on hand). Scientific discourse, e.g., climate change, psychology, biomedicine, is already highly self-policed. I point to the case of Peter Duesberg, once a prominent retro-virologist who lost everything once he showed empirical evidence that HIV was not the cause of AID$.
Yes. The oligarchs and their useful idiots have become ever-emboldened in the current era, but the agenda has been apace since at least the murder of Kennedy. Thence, we are constantly being fed with fictive cliche about basic rights while the serve up one bogeyman or another (Kim Jim-Slim, Sadam El-Maddan, Emmanuel Goldstein) to affirm the fiction.
To gain a clear-eyed view of reality, one must invariably examine foreign policy. I'm not just talking about continuous occupation of Japan, Korea, Germany, Philippines etc to prop up the value of the dollar, but more importantly the Western values bestowed upon Haiti the past 150yrs, policies in Latin America, the institutions of impoverishment IMF and World Bank, info that is wholly available and openly divulged by the likes of Kissinger.
Good article by the way. It's a good record of the horror and tactics.
Rather than trace the illusions of Covid-19 to the powerful entities and actors who have dictated and enforced The Science™ from the very beginning (Breggin & Breggin, 2021; Kennedy Jr., 2021; Broudy & Hoop, 2021; Broudy & Arakaki, 2020; Davis, 2022; Robinson, 2022), reappearing to steer the operation at every turn (Anderson et al., 2022; Hughes, 2022b; Knightly, 2022; Loffredo & Blumenthal, 2021a, 2021b; Loffredo & Webb, 2020a, 2020b, 2020c; Mercola, 2022c; Rockefeller Foundation, 2022; Stieber & Trigoso, 2022; Vandiver, 2022; WHO, 2021), The Psychology of Totalitarianism maintains that populations have primarily their own neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses to blame. We, the victims of mass deception, are encouraged to turn the critical lens on ourselves, to contend with our own foolish naïveté.-- this conclusion essentially supports my thesis.
It makes no sense to blame neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses ala Freud of those who were forcefully locked down by authorities, arrested for being outside, beaten for being maskless, in some countries sealed in their homes or removed to camps, or forced to choose between having a job and feeding their familes or unemployment. That was atrocity: it can and is being resisted. That some people who were fooled by this and continue to hold to it should examine their actions in this? Sure.
Adding: You suggest looking at foreign policy or actions. There are cycles everywhere, from the universe down to the individual physical level. War has a definate cycle, as do nations, economics, and pandemics. Many of these have been linked to Pi. The WEF, in particular, is attempting to use cycles to affect the nature and outcome of a major one we are in right now, hence their 2023 goal, about where a new cycle begins. While humanity may not be able to stop a cycle, it may be possible to adjust its strength and direction. I do not, however, believe or credit Desmet for intuiting this as it is not part of his discussion. No doubt all the actions of a group affect the cycles, not just neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses.
We're agreeing. I fully understand the critical perspective the authors take toward the strategy to psychologize a top-down atrocity. As stated above, politicians are not the top, rather actors to take the heat should the public push back. Meanwhile, the Rockefellers, Davos crowd, and other social engineers with money powers remain completely off the radar. Elected officials and promoters reside essentially at the second tier of strata outlined in the article.
I would say that they are not off the radar. There are many here who see what is going on and are working to resist them. I think, also, if enough politicians see there are consequences for their behavior, it will chill their compliance.
It seems to me that the the legal shell game of whey they avail themselves complicates efforts to hold them to any account. Thence, most attention is directed toward "elected" officials who themselves are afforded a measure of immunity.
While there are hidden interests, leaders are not puppets. They are willing agents of whatever idea or group they choose, whether it is the people, financial or political interests or some belief. To say leaders are puppets is to absolve them of any responsibility for their actions, particularly when they commit atrocities. That they are puppets of some outside force is the notion put forth by Desmet's mass formation, which has no science behind it nor does it comport with reality. https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/11/investigative-reports/covid-19-mass-formation-or-mass-atrocity/
Thanks for such an eloquent response. I can see that one may conclude that leaders should not be held to account, but that's not what I'm saying. The scope of political discourse is vary narrowly contained, all while oligarchic initiatives get carried out usually under the radar. The control of media, academy, politicians, and courts is obfuscated through rituals and discourse that makes us believe that we are active participants in as opposed to the subjects of. Between the interests of secret societies and the money making powers of these shadowy forces, the idealized function of social institutions and governance is a highly dubious notion. Holding politicians may have some palliative effect, but it fails to strike at the core of the problem we're facing.
"Overnight, the public face of science was transformed from a civil and civilian endeavor into a matter of law and order."-- This statement, for example, is naive. Science journals are held by one entity (source not on hand). Scientific discourse, e.g., climate change, psychology, biomedicine, is already highly self-policed. I point to the case of Peter Duesberg, once a prominent retro-virologist who lost everything once he showed empirical evidence that HIV was not the cause of AID$.
Yes. The oligarchs and their useful idiots have become ever-emboldened in the current era, but the agenda has been apace since at least the murder of Kennedy. Thence, we are constantly being fed with fictive cliche about basic rights while the serve up one bogeyman or another (Kim Jim-Slim, Sadam El-Maddan, Emmanuel Goldstein) to affirm the fiction.
To gain a clear-eyed view of reality, one must invariably examine foreign policy. I'm not just talking about continuous occupation of Japan, Korea, Germany, Philippines etc to prop up the value of the dollar, but more importantly the Western values bestowed upon Haiti the past 150yrs, policies in Latin America, the institutions of impoverishment IMF and World Bank, info that is wholly available and openly divulged by the likes of Kissinger.
Good article by the way. It's a good record of the horror and tactics.
Rather than trace the illusions of Covid-19 to the powerful entities and actors who have dictated and enforced The Science™ from the very beginning (Breggin & Breggin, 2021; Kennedy Jr., 2021; Broudy & Hoop, 2021; Broudy & Arakaki, 2020; Davis, 2022; Robinson, 2022), reappearing to steer the operation at every turn (Anderson et al., 2022; Hughes, 2022b; Knightly, 2022; Loffredo & Blumenthal, 2021a, 2021b; Loffredo & Webb, 2020a, 2020b, 2020c; Mercola, 2022c; Rockefeller Foundation, 2022; Stieber & Trigoso, 2022; Vandiver, 2022; WHO, 2021), The Psychology of Totalitarianism maintains that populations have primarily their own neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses to blame. We, the victims of mass deception, are encouraged to turn the critical lens on ourselves, to contend with our own foolish naïveté.-- this conclusion essentially supports my thesis.
It makes no sense to blame neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses ala Freud of those who were forcefully locked down by authorities, arrested for being outside, beaten for being maskless, in some countries sealed in their homes or removed to camps, or forced to choose between having a job and feeding their familes or unemployment. That was atrocity: it can and is being resisted. That some people who were fooled by this and continue to hold to it should examine their actions in this? Sure.
Adding: You suggest looking at foreign policy or actions. There are cycles everywhere, from the universe down to the individual physical level. War has a definate cycle, as do nations, economics, and pandemics. Many of these have been linked to Pi. The WEF, in particular, is attempting to use cycles to affect the nature and outcome of a major one we are in right now, hence their 2023 goal, about where a new cycle begins. While humanity may not be able to stop a cycle, it may be possible to adjust its strength and direction. I do not, however, believe or credit Desmet for intuiting this as it is not part of his discussion. No doubt all the actions of a group affect the cycles, not just neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses.
We're agreeing. I fully understand the critical perspective the authors take toward the strategy to psychologize a top-down atrocity. As stated above, politicians are not the top, rather actors to take the heat should the public push back. Meanwhile, the Rockefellers, Davos crowd, and other social engineers with money powers remain completely off the radar. Elected officials and promoters reside essentially at the second tier of strata outlined in the article.
I would say that they are not off the radar. There are many here who see what is going on and are working to resist them. I think, also, if enough politicians see there are consequences for their behavior, it will chill their compliance.
It seems to me that the the legal shell game of whey they avail themselves complicates efforts to hold them to any account. Thence, most attention is directed toward "elected" officials who themselves are afforded a measure of immunity.
Good chatting have a great week.