2 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Were the angle cuts artifacts of the initial demolition, or of later demolition work? If former, perhaps a shielding effect? Nanothermite isn't a very effective demolition explosive, but is inordinately expensive. (How do you even make nanoaluminum? Byproduct of aluminizing telescope mirrors or Mylar? I inadvertently made nanomagnesium while working on a science fair project.) Explosions were reportedly heard. The nukes in question would have been Davy Crockett munitions repurposed for demolition since soldiers can't be expected to use a munition they know will inevitably kill them.

"her"? If you mean Judy Wood, https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/toasted-cars/

Expand full comment

Yes, Judy Wood. Interesting stuff there. Will finish the vid soon. Re: nanothermite. It's not the "explosivity" of the stuff, but the effectiveness in cutting through thick metal which I commented on. Yep, the angle cuts on the massive H girders was certainly NOT cut with a torch during clean up. The site was still being scoured for survivors and it was during the first couple days after the tower fell. ANYway, the cloud of white dust was later analyzed for content, and found to have that thermite in it. Or its signature. 'Not sure how the chemistry works, but it does not lie.

Thanks so much for your observations,

Ray

Expand full comment