The issue I have with that, aside from the more obvious, is that the huge steel girders were "angle cut" using what appeared to be thermite demo charges. Low noise, extreme heat, etc...
Explosives are avoided if possible during demos for obvious reasons. The intent was to create a disaster which was "explainable" and nukes no matter how s…
The issue I have with that, aside from the more obvious, is that the huge steel girders were "angle cut" using what appeared to be thermite demo charges. Low noise, extreme heat, etc...
Explosives are avoided if possible during demos for obvious reasons. The intent was to create a disaster which was "explainable" and nukes no matter how small, (if they're even existing) would certainly leave their signatures behind. I'm not saying it's an impossibility, only that I personally tend to think it's a bit of a stretch.
Thanks for your input and please shoot me that link to her info.
Were the angle cuts artifacts of the initial demolition, or of later demolition work? If former, perhaps a shielding effect? Nanothermite isn't a very effective demolition explosive, but is inordinately expensive. (How do you even make nanoaluminum? Byproduct of aluminizing telescope mirrors or Mylar? I inadvertently made nanomagnesium while working on a science fair project.) Explosions were reportedly heard. The nukes in question would have been Davy Crockett munitions repurposed for demolition since soldiers can't be expected to use a munition they know will inevitably kill them.
Yes, Judy Wood. Interesting stuff there. Will finish the vid soon. Re: nanothermite. It's not the "explosivity" of the stuff, but the effectiveness in cutting through thick metal which I commented on. Yep, the angle cuts on the massive H girders was certainly NOT cut with a torch during clean up. The site was still being scoured for survivors and it was during the first couple days after the tower fell. ANYway, the cloud of white dust was later analyzed for content, and found to have that thermite in it. Or its signature. 'Not sure how the chemistry works, but it does not lie.
The issue I have with that, aside from the more obvious, is that the huge steel girders were "angle cut" using what appeared to be thermite demo charges. Low noise, extreme heat, etc...
Explosives are avoided if possible during demos for obvious reasons. The intent was to create a disaster which was "explainable" and nukes no matter how small, (if they're even existing) would certainly leave their signatures behind. I'm not saying it's an impossibility, only that I personally tend to think it's a bit of a stretch.
Thanks for your input and please shoot me that link to her info.
R
Were the angle cuts artifacts of the initial demolition, or of later demolition work? If former, perhaps a shielding effect? Nanothermite isn't a very effective demolition explosive, but is inordinately expensive. (How do you even make nanoaluminum? Byproduct of aluminizing telescope mirrors or Mylar? I inadvertently made nanomagnesium while working on a science fair project.) Explosions were reportedly heard. The nukes in question would have been Davy Crockett munitions repurposed for demolition since soldiers can't be expected to use a munition they know will inevitably kill them.
"her"? If you mean Judy Wood, https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/toasted-cars/
Yes, Judy Wood. Interesting stuff there. Will finish the vid soon. Re: nanothermite. It's not the "explosivity" of the stuff, but the effectiveness in cutting through thick metal which I commented on. Yep, the angle cuts on the massive H girders was certainly NOT cut with a torch during clean up. The site was still being scoured for survivors and it was during the first couple days after the tower fell. ANYway, the cloud of white dust was later analyzed for content, and found to have that thermite in it. Or its signature. 'Not sure how the chemistry works, but it does not lie.
Thanks so much for your observations,
Ray