IDK. I was shocked and surprised to hear a person I believe credible talk about how the damage appeared to go in a straight line in Hi. I do know that Black Rock is already making plans with Zelensky to build Ukraine back better. I still can't get my head around that kind of evil.
I guess when it happens in Haiti, Vietnam, and Honduras it's kinda just market forces an' libburdy, but suddenly hell on earth when the same hits home.
"Leaders" are puppets of hidden interests who frame narratives around which people become zealots, irrationally enthused. There's little to do about it beyond protecting our poise for discernment. The "leaders" they hold before us are just poseurs that the easily swayed fall for.
While there are hidden interests, leaders are not puppets. They are willing agents of whatever idea or group they choose, whether it is the people, financial or political interests or some belief. To say leaders are puppets is to absolve them of any responsibility for their actions, particularly when they commit atrocities. That they are puppets of some outside force is the notion put forth by Desmet's mass formation, which has no science behind it nor does it comport with reality. https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/11/investigative-reports/covid-19-mass-formation-or-mass-atrocity/
Thanks for such an eloquent response. I can see that one may conclude that leaders should not be held to account, but that's not what I'm saying. The scope of political discourse is vary narrowly contained, all while oligarchic initiatives get carried out usually under the radar. The control of media, academy, politicians, and courts is obfuscated through rituals and discourse that makes us believe that we are active participants in as opposed to the subjects of. Between the interests of secret societies and the money making powers of these shadowy forces, the idealized function of social institutions and governance is a highly dubious notion. Holding politicians may have some palliative effect, but it fails to strike at the core of the problem we're facing.
"Overnight, the public face of science was transformed from a civil and civilian endeavor into a matter of law and order."-- This statement, for example, is naive. Science journals are held by one entity (source not on hand). Scientific discourse, e.g., climate change, psychology, biomedicine, is already highly self-policed. I point to the case of Peter Duesberg, once a prominent retro-virologist who lost everything once he showed empirical evidence that HIV was not the cause of AID$.
Yes. The oligarchs and their useful idiots have become ever-emboldened in the current era, but the agenda has been apace since at least the murder of Kennedy. Thence, we are constantly being fed with fictive cliche about basic rights while the serve up one bogeyman or another (Kim Jim-Slim, Sadam El-Maddan, Emmanuel Goldstein) to affirm the fiction.
To gain a clear-eyed view of reality, one must invariably examine foreign policy. I'm not just talking about continuous occupation of Japan, Korea, Germany, Philippines etc to prop up the value of the dollar, but more importantly the Western values bestowed upon Haiti the past 150yrs, policies in Latin America, the institutions of impoverishment IMF and World Bank, info that is wholly available and openly divulged by the likes of Kissinger.
Good article by the way. It's a good record of the horror and tactics.
Rather than trace the illusions of Covid-19 to the powerful entities and actors who have dictated and enforced The ScienceтДв from the very beginning (Breggin & Breggin, 2021; Kennedy Jr., 2021; Broudy & Hoop, 2021; Broudy & Arakaki, 2020; Davis, 2022; Robinson, 2022), reappearing to steer the operation at every turn (Anderson et al., 2022; Hughes, 2022b; Knightly, 2022; Loffredo & Blumenthal, 2021a, 2021b; Loffredo & Webb, 2020a, 2020b, 2020c; Mercola, 2022c; Rockefeller Foundation, 2022; Stieber & Trigoso, 2022; Vandiver, 2022; WHO, 2021), The Psychology of Totalitarianism maintains that populations have primarily their own neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses to blame. We, the victims of mass deception, are encouraged to turn the critical lens on ourselves, to contend with our own foolish na├пvet├й.-- this conclusion essentially supports my thesis.
It makes no sense to blame neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses ala Freud of those who were forcefully locked down by authorities, arrested for being outside, beaten for being maskless, in some countries sealed in their homes or removed to camps, or forced to choose between having a job and feeding their familes or unemployment. That was atrocity: it can and is being resisted. That some people who were fooled by this and continue to hold to it should examine their actions in this? Sure.
Adding: You suggest looking at foreign policy or actions. There are cycles everywhere, from the universe down to the individual physical level. War has a definate cycle, as do nations, economics, and pandemics. Many of these have been linked to Pi. The WEF, in particular, is attempting to use cycles to affect the nature and outcome of a major one we are in right now, hence their 2023 goal, about where a new cycle begins. While humanity may not be able to stop a cycle, it may be possible to adjust its strength and direction. I do not, however, believe or credit Desmet for intuiting this as it is not part of his discussion. No doubt all the actions of a group affect the cycles, not just neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses.
We're agreeing. I fully understand the critical perspective the authors take toward the strategy to psychologize a top-down atrocity. As stated above, politicians are not the top, rather actors to take the heat should the public push back. Meanwhile, the Rockefellers, Davos crowd, and other social engineers with money powers remain completely off the radar. Elected officials and promoters reside essentially at the second tier of strata outlined in the article.
I saw a circle (also including boats on the water). Did it move linearly? Gyrotron on aircraft?
IDK. I was shocked and surprised to hear a person I believe credible talk about how the damage appeared to go in a straight line in Hi. I do know that Black Rock is already making plans with Zelensky to build Ukraine back better. I still can't get my head around that kind of evil.
There was a guy who tracked the fires to a particular norad object, this page popped up at the time https://www.misterrobots.com/lasers
Wow!
I guess when it happens in Haiti, Vietnam, and Honduras it's kinda just market forces an' libburdy, but suddenly hell on earth when the same hits home.
It's hell everywhere. Someone asked me about the conflict in Israel and what side I am on. I said I am on the side of the innocents on both sides who are abused by their so-called leaders. More civilians die in wars than military forces. But openly calling for shit like this tells me they are losing. It will just take time and misery to get there. https://reclaimthenet.org/wef-complains-about-disinformation-calls-for-a-concerted-effort-against-it-from-government-and-tech-companies
"Leaders" are puppets of hidden interests who frame narratives around which people become zealots, irrationally enthused. There's little to do about it beyond protecting our poise for discernment. The "leaders" they hold before us are just poseurs that the easily swayed fall for.
While there are hidden interests, leaders are not puppets. They are willing agents of whatever idea or group they choose, whether it is the people, financial or political interests or some belief. To say leaders are puppets is to absolve them of any responsibility for their actions, particularly when they commit atrocities. That they are puppets of some outside force is the notion put forth by Desmet's mass formation, which has no science behind it nor does it comport with reality. https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/11/investigative-reports/covid-19-mass-formation-or-mass-atrocity/
Thanks for such an eloquent response. I can see that one may conclude that leaders should not be held to account, but that's not what I'm saying. The scope of political discourse is vary narrowly contained, all while oligarchic initiatives get carried out usually under the radar. The control of media, academy, politicians, and courts is obfuscated through rituals and discourse that makes us believe that we are active participants in as opposed to the subjects of. Between the interests of secret societies and the money making powers of these shadowy forces, the idealized function of social institutions and governance is a highly dubious notion. Holding politicians may have some palliative effect, but it fails to strike at the core of the problem we're facing.
"Overnight, the public face of science was transformed from a civil and civilian endeavor into a matter of law and order."-- This statement, for example, is naive. Science journals are held by one entity (source not on hand). Scientific discourse, e.g., climate change, psychology, biomedicine, is already highly self-policed. I point to the case of Peter Duesberg, once a prominent retro-virologist who lost everything once he showed empirical evidence that HIV was not the cause of AID$.
Yes. The oligarchs and their useful idiots have become ever-emboldened in the current era, but the agenda has been apace since at least the murder of Kennedy. Thence, we are constantly being fed with fictive cliche about basic rights while the serve up one bogeyman or another (Kim Jim-Slim, Sadam El-Maddan, Emmanuel Goldstein) to affirm the fiction.
To gain a clear-eyed view of reality, one must invariably examine foreign policy. I'm not just talking about continuous occupation of Japan, Korea, Germany, Philippines etc to prop up the value of the dollar, but more importantly the Western values bestowed upon Haiti the past 150yrs, policies in Latin America, the institutions of impoverishment IMF and World Bank, info that is wholly available and openly divulged by the likes of Kissinger.
Good article by the way. It's a good record of the horror and tactics.
Rather than trace the illusions of Covid-19 to the powerful entities and actors who have dictated and enforced The ScienceтДв from the very beginning (Breggin & Breggin, 2021; Kennedy Jr., 2021; Broudy & Hoop, 2021; Broudy & Arakaki, 2020; Davis, 2022; Robinson, 2022), reappearing to steer the operation at every turn (Anderson et al., 2022; Hughes, 2022b; Knightly, 2022; Loffredo & Blumenthal, 2021a, 2021b; Loffredo & Webb, 2020a, 2020b, 2020c; Mercola, 2022c; Rockefeller Foundation, 2022; Stieber & Trigoso, 2022; Vandiver, 2022; WHO, 2021), The Psychology of Totalitarianism maintains that populations have primarily their own neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses to blame. We, the victims of mass deception, are encouraged to turn the critical lens on ourselves, to contend with our own foolish na├пvet├й.-- this conclusion essentially supports my thesis.
It makes no sense to blame neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses ala Freud of those who were forcefully locked down by authorities, arrested for being outside, beaten for being maskless, in some countries sealed in their homes or removed to camps, or forced to choose between having a job and feeding their familes or unemployment. That was atrocity: it can and is being resisted. That some people who were fooled by this and continue to hold to it should examine their actions in this? Sure.
Adding: You suggest looking at foreign policy or actions. There are cycles everywhere, from the universe down to the individual physical level. War has a definate cycle, as do nations, economics, and pandemics. Many of these have been linked to Pi. The WEF, in particular, is attempting to use cycles to affect the nature and outcome of a major one we are in right now, hence their 2023 goal, about where a new cycle begins. While humanity may not be able to stop a cycle, it may be possible to adjust its strength and direction. I do not, however, believe or credit Desmet for intuiting this as it is not part of his discussion. No doubt all the actions of a group affect the cycles, not just neuroses and auto-oppressive impulses.
We're agreeing. I fully understand the critical perspective the authors take toward the strategy to psychologize a top-down atrocity. As stated above, politicians are not the top, rather actors to take the heat should the public push back. Meanwhile, the Rockefellers, Davos crowd, and other social engineers with money powers remain completely off the radar. Elected officials and promoters reside essentially at the second tier of strata outlined in the article.
Esp. if the movement wasn't with the wind. Was it?
Was it? IDK.
That's a VERY good thought, for sure.