Which is a shame since there is so much variability in what creates cancer. For example, many female cancers are largely due to estrogen imbalances but this is rarely if ever looked at.
Raymond Peat PhD. writes a LOT about excess estrogen being a factor in all sorts of health issues. Have you read any of his articles? They’re fully cited with lots of references at the end for more exploration.
Many years ago I had my first and only obligatory mammogram at age 40. They found a small spot which was confirmed with a follow-up ultra sound. I was going through a stressful time and basically ignored it until years later when I could physically see and feel a large lump. I went to see my doc and she ordered a needle biopsy. I went home and read about needle track metastasis and decided not to have that procedure done. Instead, I started an intense regiment that I created for myself based on Dr. Peat’s research of estrogen and bio-identical progesterone. I think it took 1-1.5 years for my lump to disappear. Follow up thermography showed clear tissues, absolutely nothing🥳Even more importantly I felt so much better. I’m 56 now and I truly feel that bio-identical progesterone is a MAJOR key to health and well-being as I age.
#1 breast/gynecological cysts and cancers are due to excessive estrogen levels. One person I know has a lot of luck here by using aromatase inhibitors and natural aromatase inhibitors to lower estrogen levels.
#2 same as above, but the estrogen levels are treated by giving testosterone. A few people I know I've had a lot of success with this approach and think that it is better than directly reducing the estrogen levels.
#3 many issues and men arise from estrogen (e.g. xenoestrogens) suppressing testosterone production in the body, and by giving clomiphene which prevents those estrogens from altering hormone levels, you can fix low testosterone levels.
#4 most of the integrative doctors I know who work with female issues believe that bioidentical progesterone is extremely important for a lot of good ends, particularly maintaining a healthy pregnancy and not having a spontaneous abortion.
This is wonderful. Congratulations on taking control of your health!
I read that up to 50% of mammograms are false positives. I have never had one and at age 63, never plan to. The pink washing for breast cancer is sickening, as many of these pink ribbon companies, produce carcinogenic products that women use regularly. There is much fear mongering and brainwashing in this field of medicine.
Prevention and nutrition, are not a part of their campaigns.
Recently I learned of a friend's colleague who had a double mastectomy preventively, as did her 3 sisters, because their mother died of breast cancer. I wonder if she died of breast cancer or the treatment for it. :(
100% AGREED! The fear mongering, propaganda and profiteering surrounding breast cancer is DISGUSTING. Meanwhile no effort is made to clean up our environment 😔
And now it seems they may have created a "winner" in causing cancer. The spike translocates to the nucleus per NIH/NIAID authors recent preprint (and their peers who got bullied and censored...). Read:
Cancer treatment is the shining example of one-size-fits-all. You follow the SOP or else.
Which is a shame since there is so much variability in what creates cancer. For example, many female cancers are largely due to estrogen imbalances but this is rarely if ever looked at.
Raymond Peat PhD. writes a LOT about excess estrogen being a factor in all sorts of health issues. Have you read any of his articles? They’re fully cited with lots of references at the end for more exploration.
Many years ago I had my first and only obligatory mammogram at age 40. They found a small spot which was confirmed with a follow-up ultra sound. I was going through a stressful time and basically ignored it until years later when I could physically see and feel a large lump. I went to see my doc and she ordered a needle biopsy. I went home and read about needle track metastasis and decided not to have that procedure done. Instead, I started an intense regiment that I created for myself based on Dr. Peat’s research of estrogen and bio-identical progesterone. I think it took 1-1.5 years for my lump to disappear. Follow up thermography showed clear tissues, absolutely nothing🥳Even more importantly I felt so much better. I’m 56 now and I truly feel that bio-identical progesterone is a MAJOR key to health and well-being as I age.
There are a few schools of thought on this.
#1 breast/gynecological cysts and cancers are due to excessive estrogen levels. One person I know has a lot of luck here by using aromatase inhibitors and natural aromatase inhibitors to lower estrogen levels.
#2 same as above, but the estrogen levels are treated by giving testosterone. A few people I know I've had a lot of success with this approach and think that it is better than directly reducing the estrogen levels.
#3 many issues and men arise from estrogen (e.g. xenoestrogens) suppressing testosterone production in the body, and by giving clomiphene which prevents those estrogens from altering hormone levels, you can fix low testosterone levels.
#4 most of the integrative doctors I know who work with female issues believe that bioidentical progesterone is extremely important for a lot of good ends, particularly maintaining a healthy pregnancy and not having a spontaneous abortion.
This is wonderful. Congratulations on taking control of your health!
I read that up to 50% of mammograms are false positives. I have never had one and at age 63, never plan to. The pink washing for breast cancer is sickening, as many of these pink ribbon companies, produce carcinogenic products that women use regularly. There is much fear mongering and brainwashing in this field of medicine.
Prevention and nutrition, are not a part of their campaigns.
Recently I learned of a friend's colleague who had a double mastectomy preventively, as did her 3 sisters, because their mother died of breast cancer. I wonder if she died of breast cancer or the treatment for it. :(
100% AGREED! The fear mongering, propaganda and profiteering surrounding breast cancer is DISGUSTING. Meanwhile no effort is made to clean up our environment 😔
Agreed! Plastics.
And now it seems they may have created a "winner" in causing cancer. The spike translocates to the nucleus per NIH/NIAID authors recent preprint (and their peers who got bullied and censored...). Read:
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/new-study-vindicates-jiang-and-mei/comments
Please read what I wrote about that in the previous part of this series:
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/why-does-every-vaccine-often-cause
Yes. Spot on.