437 Comments

Quitting legacy media is like quitting smoking.

You don’t notice how bad legacy media stinks until you quit it… and after quitting, it’s nauseating to be around.

Expand full comment
author

I love this comment!

Expand full comment

Hey, one thing I just want to be sure to tell you before I forget. he had been giving prepared notes from a Teleprompter and as such, he had been reading the Teleprompter with his head in a stationary position. Right before he got shot, he said hey l'd like to show the crowd that chart that chart of the illegal immigration into the United States and he talked to his people and said hey do you mind if I go off the teleprompter? he did go off the teleprompter and that's why he was looking at the slide instead of looking straight forward.

Expand full comment

OMG this is so true!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I came to substack "slowly and then all at once".

And quite literally cannot stomach MSM anymore!

Expand full comment

I gave it up in 2012. Even then, for those who were awake, the lying was beyond reproach.

Expand full comment

What is the difference between the Trump assassination attempt and ALL other American president assassinations attempts whether successful or not???

After the shooter went for President Trump, he then started to target Trump followers before he was taken out.

Prior to Trump, the liberal media mostly savaged the conservative leader in their Pravda hit pieces and their TV stalking. Starting with Trump, the liberal media began to also savage Trump followers (MAGA) and an early indicator of the depths that they would go was the innocent Covington Catholic high school student, Nick Sandman, for the liberal crime of wearing a red hat and smiling while being confronted. The legacy media was following the lead of Hillary deplorables and BHO clingers comments as fair game to attack and also use to justify censorship and Stasi tactics. This is sowing the seeds of civil war!

THIS is why "The Media are the Enemy of the People!" The legacy media is responsible for the death of Corey Comperatore IMHO.

Expand full comment

Have you noticed how no one mentions finding the spent bullet and matching it to the shooters weapon. Hmmm?

Expand full comment

I'm sure the FBI that had Hunter's laptop for a year before the election is on top of that bullet point.

Expand full comment

Deserves a million likes. Thank you.

Expand full comment

I stopped listening to legacy media 14 years ago when I ditched the TV and never purchased another one.

Expand full comment
Jul 18·edited Jul 18

Good for you! I stopped watching the idiot box as a young teen in 1968 and have never owned one. I likened it to what the Romans called the "penates", an altar where the household 'gods' would speak to them. Unfortunately, the computer is just as bad but at least there are some intelligent humans here (such as MWD)! Blessings to all herein!

Expand full comment

What?? No Brady Bunch???

Dude, that is like un-American! 😜

Expand full comment

Sandy K, Good on you, been since 1971 for myself - Not missing a bloody thing!

Expand full comment

TV has nothing to do with legacy media. I haven't watched a news broadcast in over 30 years, but I still have a tv. Yes there are those who are glued to tv "news", but many more people get the legacy media feeds into their phones and computers now.

Expand full comment

It is all about choice--what one puts in front of them. I choose not to have a TV because there is nothing broadcast that interests me and I don't want to pay for service and still be inundated with advertising. Besides, I am a nomad and it would be extra baggage.

Expand full comment

Sure, we all have a choice what to consume. I'm just saying a tv doesn't really equate to news. There's plenty of tv content with no commercials and no news. And there's plenty of mainstream news that can be consumed without a tv.

Expand full comment

And therefore you are no' mad, not mad!

Expand full comment

So true. So very true.

Expand full comment

You have said it so well! So true, thank you.

Expand full comment

Exactly my experience. I recommend it highly.

Expand full comment

Perfect analogy. And you realize how unnecessary, foolish, and costly it was.

Expand full comment

There is no such thing as luck.

Luck is when preparation meets opportunity.

Crooks wasn't just a "lucky" would-be assassin by avoiding all the security assets at the rally and by "randomingly" choosing a near perfect sniper position (and ladder) with a natural tree line blind obscuring the vision of the only two elevated secret service overwatch sniper teams (and on the same building the Secret Service Director is on the record stating she denied roof access for placement of the third sniper overwatch). There is no dumb luck with any of that. Period.

The rally was the opportunity.

Who helped Crooks with the preparation as he most certaintly had lots of help?

Compartmentalized operations are by definition designed so that the compartments are not aware of the entire operation and the compartments may not even know they are part of the operation. Such a design affords both inherent plausible deniability and provides no mechanism from which the entire operation can be assembled from outside-in (aka it all gets buried in internal investigations).

In my opinion based on everything put forth in the public space from credible sources.. including the FBI.. the assassination attempt was a compartmentalized kill operation until proven otherwise. The more info released by the internal investigation the more it points that direction. I fully expect the granularity of the information released to become rapidly more vague, more general.

Start breaking down the compartments for the assassination attempt and build the case: rural rally location, advance team site security assessment, security changes denials before rally, security during rally, etc etc.

Prove me wrong. Please. I want to be wrong.

I am still stunned at the number of people I meet that feel such compartmentalized operations are the stuff of make believe.

Those operations are as real as it gets.

Expand full comment

The mounting evidence has convinced me the assassination attempt was planned. I long ago predicted the deep state in collusion with the democrat/communist party will not allow Trump to return to the Oval Office. They will do anything they need to do to prevent him. That includes such things as assassination, getting the United States directly and deeply involved in another war, instigating another plandemic, bankrupting and jailing Trump, eliminating or otherwise defusing his closet advisors, economic collapse, false flag scenario, a suspended election or another stolen election, inciting massive civil unrest, or any combination of one or more of these. What other nefarious schemes are they presently planning? When 51 former intelligence officials signed a document claiming the Hunter Biden laptop was a Russian disinformation campaign, that’s all one needs to know about how corrupt the deep state, the shadow government is. They were shocked in 2016 when Trump beat Hillary in spite of their best efforts to defame him and sabotage his campaign. They then went on to do whatever they could do to sabotage his Presidency. The evidence shows they stole the 2020 Presidential election by having unauthorized election officials rewrite the voting requirements for the choosing of Presidential electors in several key states. This was in direct violation of the United States Constitution which grants that authority solely to the respective state legislatures. Courts refused to hear the evidence. The failed assassination attempt is just a temporary setback. They will reach deeper into their bag of evil of tricks to stop Trump.

Expand full comment

Until there is a VERY good explanation as to why the Director of the Secret Service denied the use of a sniper overwatch position on the SAME rooftop used by Crooks, then she is directly involved in the assassination attempt. Period. There is ZERO reason for her to micromanage security at the Trump rally. If the secret service advance team makes security decisions then those decisions are followed. She wasnt part of the advance team. She had no direct hands on knowledge of the Trump rally site security needs. Yet she denied placement if the ONLY sniper overwatch location that ultimately was used by Crooks. Its stunning that she has not been arrested or interrogated by any law enforcement agency.

Expand full comment

So you think it's a lie that the shooter hated all politicians and only chose Trump over Biden because Trump's rally was close to where he lived?

Expand full comment

I dont think, I know (her own words) that the Director of Secret Service denied... not anyone else, just her... denied rooftop placement of sniper overwatch on the same roof used by Cooks and her ONLY reason was a bullshit "slope of roof" nonsense. She is implicated until proven otherwise

Expand full comment

Very cogent points. History suggests that it’s not rare that mysterious “misfortunes” occur in the local community as a result of a breach in any of those compartments. One difference I have is that any reference to the FBI as a credible source is a huge leap of faith based on the thorough corrupt nature of that entity. It has become our nations secret police serving both parties in their trashing of the constitution and civil liberties.

Expand full comment

I love the way MWD is taking his conversations - & this blog.

Now we know (unless I previously missed it) some of his deeper convictions e.g. a belief in the Yali Yuga and his spiritual inclinations and presumably all that goes with it.

And all that goes with it, MUST go with it (if reason prevails) is this:

THERE ARE NO ACCIDENTS IN THE UNIVERSE.

Ponder on the significance of that for a moment or two.

Trump's t Trump's 'miraculous escape' via his gut feeling, comes back to...see above.

So, Chad, the first part of your comment:

'There is no such thing as luck'.

is spot on.

However, it isn't: ' Luck is when preparation meets opportunity' - it's rather when consequences (Karma) are realised in the present moment.

Of course, huuge ramifications to this concept and many if not most will reject it out of hand, because they find it is really just too painful to accept

And if the Kali Yuga has hundreds of thousands of - downhill - years to run, Mmmmmm..

But then, we're here because - The are no accidents in the Universe.

Expand full comment

I should have added, don't be too disheartened as there's always a 'rope out of the swamp' - maybe God's Grace via your own efforts? - I dunno and I'm still searching for the end of that rope.

Expand full comment

If it were a real inside operation, he wouldn't have been photographed multiple times wandering around looking like a planner.

Compartmentalization is real. Bureaucracies are real. Combine the two, and you get stupendous results that can sometimes defy logic...because bureacracies are nature's anti-logic.

Expand full comment

And if he were meant to be the patsy, and wasn't the one who actually almost killed Trump?

Expand full comment

Crooks wasnt a "professional". His actions would have never reflected such.. "wandering arpund", etc. If he was a professional, then Trump would be dead. No professional attempts a head shot when center mass will achieve same lethal result... unless the shooter knows with 100% certainty the target has ballistic clothing, body armor or both...and even then, the assassin weapon system of choice would be able to overcome the targets protection. I dont care if Crooks was professionally acting. I care he knew where to go to shoot at the rally.

Expand full comment

He was caught on camera and called in more than once. Under normal circumstances, that ends his mission as he gets encountered.

So, any sponsored job would have failed by putting such a person on display.

Expand full comment

The plot twists thicken...

Expand full comment

These compartmentalized departments have been used very successfully to keep people in the dark about off-world beings and our relationships with them.

Expand full comment

Indeed, there is no such thing as luck. Even Trump couldn't be this lucky.

If the Deep State really wanted Trump dead, he would be dead. There is plenty of evidence that there was more than one shooter on the kill team. It's very possible that 'Crooks' was a decoy, in addition to being a patsy, and he might not have actually taken a single shot.

Professional snipers with a green light to kill, don't miss. And even if they did miss the first shot: if they were still in the field with their locations undiscovered, why didn't they shoot again while Trump was grandstanding and shaking his fist?

'Midwest Doctor' rejected the possibility that the incident was a staged, fake assassination, whose outcome was exactly as intended. He says this is because a shooter couldn't be so precise as to take out his ear? Well, what about the possibility that the shooters aimed to miss Trump by at least a foot or two, while Trump came equipped with a vial of ketsup?

Expand full comment

Naomi Wolf has written a piece that parallels the ‘compartments’ argument.

Expand full comment
Jul 18Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

Re: The Catalyst section: My spouse is a (private) pilot, so we have read many accident reports in aviation magazines over the decades. Most accidents come from a long chain of bad decisions, any one of which might not be fatal, but in a series, are. Risk management in the cockpit (for the pros) is about breaking that chain so that accidents don't happen. We have known more than a few pilots - some personally, some by reputation - even some very, very experienced pilots who have smeared themselves over the face of the earth by making mistakes. We try ourselves to have set procedures so that we don't end up being a statistic.

And talking about 'gut feeling': for us, it takes 'two green lights' to go on a flight. If one of us, for any reason or no conscious reason at all doesn't feel right about flying, no discussion, we don't go.

So far, so good.

Expand full comment

Checklists would have prevented the close call here.

Vain professionals tend to abhor checklists. Real professionals know that checklists are not indicators of stupidity but, rather, indicators of intelligence and competency.

Example: counter snipers watch and observe something unknown/unidentifiable/unclassifyable to them. Rather than keep observing something like "is that our guy, their guy, some idiot, or some bad guy on that roof over there?", they instead call out an unsecured status that pauses the ceremony until they can reestablish security accountability. Not a red hot encounter...just being able to say that security doesn't even know if security is in full presence is enough to push the pause button.

Expand full comment

This was not a close call. It was a setup that failed.

Expand full comment

You mean someone organized a 20 year-old AND a handful of law enforcement officers?

Expand full comment

The 20-year-old, who incidentally I saw a clip on Facebook where he claimed he had a 10 inch penis and was a student at Stanford, was a Patsy, there was at least one other shooter.

Expand full comment

Last I heard, the kid had an fbi.gov email address....

Not to mention starring in a Black Rock vid.

Expand full comment

Probably, yes.

Expand full comment

MK ultra behind shooter actions??

Expand full comment

Your summary of accident causes was the catalyst for Michael Crichton to write Airframe. I believe FAA commissioner told him every airline disaster occurred after a sequence of 6 or more consecutive failures occurred, where had any one of which had a different outcome, the catastrophe would have been averted. Amazing, really. Little things really do matter.

Expand full comment

Moral of the story: make sure your horse double-knots his laces.

Expand full comment

It did on the accidents that we knew about personally, too.

Thx for your description - much better than mine (I'm an engineer, not a writer!)

Expand full comment
Jul 18Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

Another excellent article Doc. It was my intuition that stopped me taking any vaccines, let alone the mRNA shots. When I ignore my intuition I get into trouble. I use it everyday. I believe the more you exercise that faculty the better you get at it.

Expand full comment
author

Most people I know with severe medical injuries state one of their greatest regrets was not listening to their intuition which told them to stay away from the medication.

Expand full comment

I knew, to my bones, that I wasn't taking that shot. Every day I thank God for that intuitive guidance! Luckily my life afforded me that choice for the most part painlessly; however, many arguments and stand-offs with family, friends and colleagues ensued. But I didn't lose too much work...

Expand full comment

Me too, exactly, I knew it in my bones, I couldn't take it even if I wanted to. The risk benefit was not in its favor either, so there was no logical reason to take it either. I feel bad for people who knew the same thing, but got it anyway and we're injured. One woman said she had a panic attack on the way to get the shot, cancelled that appointment but made another one. She ended up being severely injured. I forget if she had children to take care of and did it for her job.

Expand full comment

Those are the most heartbreaking stories. Person doesn't feel good about taking it but feels that they have to, and then are injured or dead.

Expand full comment

Well done Benj. I know people whose families ostracised them because they wouldn’t take the shot. I often wonder if they now regret treating their family members like that.

Expand full comment

I'm still waiting to hear from my family. When they boosted Mom to the max, and her dementia rapidly contributed to her deterioration (& death? but I can't prove it) ....well, I was the nutjob, right? So - nobody wants to talk to the nutjob. I'm still waiting.

Expand full comment

Ego dictates that most of them will never acknowledge or admit the error of their ways. But, deep down, some will recognise they were wrong and should never have behaved the way they did. Humility will look for forgiveness, however, best not to expect it. The main thing is, you know the truth, and that can never be changed or disproved. We, the awake, swallow a bitter pill, but at least we didn’t succumb to what we knew was wrong.

Expand full comment

I have listened to my intuition my entire life and it has always served me well. Same with the covid shots....I knew I needed to research it, and increasingly I knew 100% that my intuition about refusing them was the right decision. So thankful now as most of my immediate family refused the shots and we're all fine.

Expand full comment

I overwrote my intuition on the first Covid vax, and that was a big mistake. But with the subsequent turbo-cancer I trusted it in rejecting 5 chemo's + immunotherapy. I just knew it would kill me, and I later was diagnosed with a live-long immune deficiency that proved I was right.

Expand full comment

I like to call that Divine Discernment…a holy “knowing” of truth, danger, etc.! It’s a beautiful thing!

Expand full comment

Same with me. Gut feeling told me to say hell no

Expand full comment
Jul 18·edited Jul 18

OK. Your point is well argued, so here are some arguments on the other side. Trump said if he were president, Hillary Clinton would be in jail. After he became president, he said the Clintons were "fine people". He said he was going to drain the swamp, but he not only left the administration, the military and the intelligence community full of swamp creatures, he appointed swamp creatures to his cabinet and to head other agencies and as his V.P. Then he fired General Flynn when he was framed, instead of standing by him and firing the swamp creatures that framed him. He said he would appoint RFK Jr. to investigate vaccines, but, instead, he went full on ahead with the Plandemic agenda. He brokered a deal in the Mid-East that left the Palestinians with no leverage and no hope. As for gut instincts, one of his biggest fails was allowing himself to be set-up on January 6 when many people ahead of time were publicly warning that it was a set up. There was so much he could have done to turn the Establishment's plot against him back upon them, but he didn't. He could have announced at his rally that day that he had requested Pelosi use the National Guard to guard her Congressional Capitol building and she refused. He could have warned that there could be FBI instigators in the crowd calling for violence. He could have told his people to not actaully go to the Capitol building. There was also so much he could have done to stop the steal, but he didn't. He should have immediately began a campaign to ban computerized voting machines as soon as he took office, but he didn't. Even so, he could have ordered the seizure of the voting machines in the 5 battle ground states immediately after the election to have them analyzed by independent experts, but he didn't. So, maybe he is as smart and intuitive as you say and maybe he failed so repeatedly because he was being threatened. I don't know. However, his apparently sincere support for the apartheid regime of Israel and his apparently sincere support for 5G, despite its horrible health effects, makes me think that there is really something wrong with him.

Expand full comment
author

Trump said he decided not to prosecute Hillary because he realized it would be too divisive for the country.

Expand full comment
Jul 18·edited Jul 18

Exactly. Too divisive to root out the rot like he promised. How did that work out for him? The Rot stopped his wall, blocked his plan for detente with North Korea, kept him from investigating the corruption in Ukraine, impeached him twice and stole the next election. That sounds divisive to me. They will keep on cheating and destroying unless they are stopped.

Expand full comment

Now he’s saying he’s considering Jamie Dimend for secretary of department of treasury. Draining the swamp… yeah right

Expand full comment

Exactly, and we can all see what it has been like as Biden has used lawfare to go after his adversaries.

Expand full comment

😑

Expand full comment

Also, Trump called for the Lockdowns in 2020. He also championed Operation Warp Speed. To this day, I have not heard him apologize or retract his support of the Covid jabs. He has had four years to understand this topic that has upended the health and economy of our country (and world).

The handling of pandemics and health care are reasons I will be voting for RFK Jr. He has studied the topics of health, disease, environmental toxins, and vaccines. He is qualified to dismantle the dangerous Pharmaceutical cartel that has led to a nation of very sick people.

He will also close bio labs the US has around the world. Trump's choices in advisors was awful, but doubt he will do as badly this time.

Also, he should have pardoned Julian Assange and Edward Snowden. Not my flavor for president.

Expand full comment

The recent leaked RFK phone call showed Trump not in support of childhood vaccines.

Expand full comment

Yes, it is called "controlled opposition"----the deep state only wants the electorate to have choices between its own stooges. They have no real fear of Trump. We have four years of experience to show that he is as much their puppet as anyone else. In addition to all the things you listed, he signed in on the largest deficits and increases in government spending in American history. He never exercised his veto power. He didn't end the war in Afghanistan as he promised. He took no effective action to end the border invasion. He never pardoned the Jan 6 prisoners---victims of one of the worst miscarriages of justice ever seen. Anyone who thinks Trump is going to turn things around is delusional.

Expand full comment

Yes, I agree. Additionally, he also transferred huge amounts of money from our government to corporations via pandemic relief, and agreed to lock down the country which destroyed small businesses and moved more people out on the streets. He's done the same things to undermine this country that all presidents have done in my lifetime. He's been no better or no worse than any of them in my estimation.

Expand full comment

That's something that bugs me about Trump. Most of people's complaints are based on misunderstandings (bleach, fine people, etc) (just like every episode of the TV sitcom Three's Company!). It seems that Trump could easily dispel much of this nonsense, but he rarely (never?) does.

Expand full comment

Actually - I believe that it is "this nonsense" that got him elected in the first place.

First rule of advertising: All press is good press. He doesn't shy away from any press - because even the bad press promotes him.

Expand full comment

That's because it is up to us to do so.

Expand full comment

Perhaps, he believes the media would only use it to lie and further torpedo him.

Expand full comment

That, too, is a possibility. My problem is, how much traction the "bleach", "fine people", and "bloodbath" misinterpretations were able to get. I'm beyond convinced that media gatekeepers knew exactly what he meant - and therefore knew exactly what they were doing, telling folks that he meant something else.

Seems like these things (these lies, tbh!) could be addressed directly, instead of being allowed to fester.

Expand full comment
Jul 27·edited Jul 27

I've read your above comment and the ones that follow Eli. It reads like you have a hard-on for Trump, and are accusing him of all sorts of absurdities. Next you can accuse him of not leaping tall buildings with a single bound and being unable to see through walls. Some of the accusations are ridiculous. Example- you: "He said he would appoint RFK Jr. to investigate vaccines, but, instead, he went full on ahead with the Plandemic agenda." How is that a "he said x but instead did y"? He DID appoint RFK to head a vaccine commission in Jan 2017 (https://www.politico.com/blogs/donald-trump-administration/2017/01/trump-meets-robert-f-kennedy-jr-233417). The covid outbreak was 3 years later.

What's with your BS on negotiating a peace in the Mideast but leaving the Palestinians with no hope? There were NO wars in the Mideast while Trump was president. $Billions in aid were given to Gaza, and they spent it all on tunnels and other terror preparations. That's on them.

Your words again: "one of his biggest fails was allowing himself to be set-up on January 6 when many people ahead of time were publicly warning that it was a set up." I don't remember "many people warning him ahead of time it was a set up." Can you please provide a link?

Since you yourself have superpowers and can see into the future, how about give us your download NOW on the traps the Deep State will set for him and how he can avoid them.

I'll wait.

Expand full comment

Dear Mr. Evil,

Thanks for waiting, and thanks for posting the link to Trump appointing RFK Jr. I suggest that next time you post a link that you read the article it goes to first. It says: "Later in the day, however, Trump appeared to be backing off Kennedy’s report. In a statement released by the transition team, Trump said he 'enjoyed his discussion' with Kennedy and was 'exploring the possibility of forming a committee on Autism, which affects many families; however no decisions have been made at this time.'”

If that's not definitive enough for you, you can go to https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/23/trump-did-tell-rfk-jr-to-investigate-vaccine-dangers-why-it-matters/ Where it says: "Robert Kennedy’s vaccine investigation was shut down." And, if you want to see a video of Bill Gates bragging that he told Trump to shut down RFK Jr.'s investiation, it's here: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-09-25-bill-gates-brags-ordering-trump-covid-vaccines.html at time stamp 2:11.

As for the mideast, you're right, there were no wars during Trump's term. I didn't say there was. I said Trump's deals left the Palestinians with no hope. I don't know about the $Billions you claim he gave to Gaza because you provide no documentation, but, even if that is so, what the Palestinians want is freedom. From September 13, 2020: "Over the last three years, Trump has cut off aid to the Palestinians,...dropped the longstanding U.S. opposition to Israeli settlements and released a Mideast plan that overwhelmingly favors Israel. The breakdown of the longstanding Arab consensus that recognition only be granted in return for territorial concessions has meanwhile left the Palestinians arguably more weak, isolated and demoralized than at any point in their history." https://apnews.com/article/peace-process-israel-iran-united-arab-emirates-jerusalem-c87ca011c2cd4321d587e9684dfb84e1 This is obvious if you just look at the condition the Palestinians were in during those years before Oct. 7, 2023.

As for a link that there were public warnings that January 6 was going to be a set-up, I didn't find any now. What I remember was hearing on the radio and on podcasts people saying things like: "I'm not going to attend because it's obviously a set-up." So, I knew it was as set-up, but, no, at this point I can't document that. Trump should have known that the FBI sets up fake crimes by having their agents infiltrate groups they want to take down. This goes all the way back to the anti-war movements of the 1960s and 70s. It is such a well-known tactic, it even has a name: "agent provocateurs". What he did know for sure is that Pelosi had denied his request that she use the National Guard to guard her Congressional Capitol building. So, yes, he should have known he was being set up.

As for how Trump can avoid traps being set for him by the deep state, it's simple, he needs to get rid of the swamp creatures. He needs to fire all of the swamp creatures in his administration and fill his administration with patriots. He needs to push for the swamp creatures in the Supreme Court to be impeached. He needs to find a way to ban computerized voting machines and restrict mail-in ballots. He needs to re-instate the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces treaty that he unilaterally ended. That would be a good start. Even though the answer is simple, that doesn't mean that doing it would be easy. We're in a war for our freedom.

Expand full comment
Jul 30·edited Jul 30

I did read the article. He did make the appointment. What I wrote is a valid rebuttal to your non-sequitor- "He said he would appoint RFK Jr. to investigate vaccines, but, instead, he went full on ahead with the Plandemic agenda."

Why on earth should the US give a nickel to Gaza and the Palestinians, when they pay monthly stipends to families of suicide bombers who killed civilians? Money is fungible. If the US gives them money, it makes other money available for purposes we are strongly opposed to. You might quibble, but giving money to Gaza is indirectly funding terrorism.

I didn't say Trump gave Gaza money. Biden and "the international community" sure did. Repeating- instead of using it for their own development, as the donors intended (at least, that's what they say), Gaza used it for terror machinery.

Billionaires living in luxury hotels in Qatar are skimming off the generosity of those donors, while promoting terrorism. Those poor dumb fucks in Gaza are too stupid to realize they're tools of those people.

Let's get one thing straight. The Palestinians don't want to negotiate any kind of peace with Israel. They want to eliminate Israel. They'll settle for nothing less. That's THEM saying that. And they've shown they're not just posturing by declining every peace agreement that has been negotiated.

I stopped feeling sorry for them decades ago. They're murderous terrorists. They play the victim card, blaming their situation of "the Joos." But it's all on them.

Expand full comment

You wrote: "What I wrote is a valid rebuttal to your non-sequitor- 'He said he would appoint RFK Jr. to investigate vaccines, but, instead, he went full on ahead with the Plandemic agenda.'" No it's not. What I just posted documents the fact that what I said is true. If you can't even see that, then there's no point wasting my time on your other stupid statements.

Expand full comment

Buh Bye

Expand full comment

I was just reminded that Trump also unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces treaty (INF treaty). That was the treaty that allowed both sides to monitor each other's destruction of nuclear weapons and de-escalate the threat of nuclear war. It was a hard-fought victory for peace and it was working. Trump killed it. He knew at the time that ending the treaty would lead to another nuclear arms race, and it did. Now, here we are, closer to nuclear war than ever, with the U.S. abandoning our "no first strike" policy, and openly stating that our goal is the defeat of Russia. Given that situation, why would Russia wait around for us to strike first?

Expand full comment

He may still appoint RFK2 to investigate vaccines when he gets in. I heard a leaked phone call between Trump & RFK2 talking about the horrors of vaccines, & how Trump would like to do something about this.

Expand full comment

I consider it a long game to expose all the evil and wake up the wise. It was necessary to get us fully alert and fighting, revealing all truth.

Expand full comment

What? Are you saying Trump appointed all those swamp creatures in order to wake us up to the fact that those swamp creatures are evil? Like we didn't already know that? Like we didn't already elect him to get rid of them?

Expand full comment

He is not superman, Eli, to save the word on his own. This is a collective effort of all right thinking and doing people. Part of what has happened for example, is to make people realise the harm of big pharma and that vaccines, all vaccines, are an evil deceit.

It is also to expose the true nature and source of those behind the evil, let alone to test us all as to where we stand before God.

There is a lot of work to do and I believe Trump has been working behind the scenes with others on things we do not see.

In any event, though, everything is part of a great pantomime or play.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/breaking-news-trump-shot-at-rally

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/breaking-news-joe-biden-steps-down

https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/03/11/macbeth-the-three-witches-scene/

Expand full comment

You're evading the question. The things Trump did didn't just "happen". He did them. Are you saying that Trump appointed swamp creatures so we could learn that swamp creatures are evil when we already knew that and that's why we voted for him? Are you saying that he authorized Operation Warp Speed to make us realize that vaccines are evil when he could have accomplished the same thing without all of the death and destruction by keeping his promise to appoint RFK Jr. to root out the lies and influence of the pharmaceutical companies on the government? I agree, he is not a superman. That is why he should have appointed the right people to carry out his agenda, not appoint more swamp creatures that opposed his agenda.

Expand full comment

You are not taking on board my answer and the bigger picture. You have spoken generally about swamp creatures and not specifically mentioned names so I replied to you in general terms.

There is a war going that has been going on for many decades and one man does not solve it in one presidential term. There are also other ways of dealing with the rot in society which is far more than just some key players at the top.

There is the underbelly, some of our neighbours who support what's going on, perhaps without realising what they are doing. All this needs exposing.

As regards swamp creatures, Fauci's nefarious deeds were not known to me and many others and would not have been if he had not stayed on. He has of course been at it for decades through many presidents.

What has transpired has exposed the sheer nastiness of many which would not have been readily apparent but now is.

One mustn't forget that Trump can be seeing the bigger picture.

As regards Operation Warp Speed, I am in the UK but becuase of all the nonsense I went from thinking that vaccines were of some use, but not for the 'flu as people fell ill anyway, to realising they are all bad.

If what has gone on had not happened, I and many others would not have fully woken up and the situation would have continued to get worse without the full realisation of just why it was so.

Expand full comment

Yes, I hear you. It had to get this bad for you to wake up. Got it. What you are evading is being clear about Trump. Do you think that Trump made things worse on purpose in order to wake you up when he could have just made things better?

Expand full comment

Interesting insight.

Expand full comment
Jul 18Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

Well done and persuasive. Once again, the folks intending on ruling a world with a dramatically reduced population have made some serious miscalculations, and now have to do something absolutely horrific to catch up...what will it be? It will have to be something that makes the Covid 19 "pandemic" fraud and the attempted assassination of Donald Trump look insignificant...perhaps a nuclear attack or WW 3? I hope I am wrong, but, you know, that intuition is not to be ignored...

Expand full comment

wow, that is REALLY interesting..... and scary.....

Expand full comment

Sadly, I believe it will be WW3.

Expand full comment

Outstanding article. As always, one reads things never mentioned on the conventional news or commentary.

First, the controlled demolition at 9-11 for all 3 buildings is a near certainty. The testimony and blogs of architects and structural engineers is too powerful. How any agency could coordinate and effectuate such a thing is another story but, as with Snowden, or Gursch, all we need is for one person to come forward, take the heat and the die is cast.

Regarding the Trump assassination attempt, I am astounded that CNN was live covering this event. This is a major bit of information. CNN, everyone will recall, just happened to be present in the wee hours of the morning when the FBI raided and arrested Roger Stone. The "prescience" of the CNN management (....pause for laughter here ...) is impressive. So, it was to be another lone gunmen and full video of his head exploding trick, eh ? Well, it didn't work out that way...the best laid plans of mice and Fascists.

Dropping the ball on a major security operation does not just happen. It takes acts of DEI, deliberate sloppy communications, and a wide panoply of "happenstances", like pulling Trump's regular Secret Service people and bringing in a new bunch at just the right moment.

The shooter ? You will learn nothing. Just like the Las Vegas shooter in the largest mass shooting in our history, it will all end a mystery and you will gradually forget about it.

The real enemies of the people are still there. The WEF, the propagandists, the War mongers, the financial manipulators, the Great Reseters, the ones sabotaging a world religion, the Vax pushers and those who believe things are strictly for the birds. And future shooters are out there, being programmed....as Obi Wan said, the weak minded are easy prey for the dark side.

Only WE can stop this. Only WE must.

Expand full comment

I think I heard this on Man in America, quoting someone else (followed so much cant remember!) That photo of the streak of a bullet, cld hv been photoshopped I am sure, but, apparently was taken with the super fastest shutter speed (8000). Why did the CNN photographer need that at just another rally, let alone being there unusually! He/she took the rapid shots, believing they would get The Explosive (sorry pun not intended) exclusive, that would set the US on fire. And well blow me down, it missed, but hey I got THE bullet. :(

Expand full comment

Another "coincidence" !!

What a ... surprise !

Expand full comment

Great comment!

Expand full comment

Here's what my gut tells me: Trump, longtime buddy of Roy Cohn and Trump who was also photographed palling around with Epstein, is not against the deep state. Far from it. Far more sophisticated tech exists from what the public yet knows about, in respose to "how could this be pulled off as a staged event."

My gut also tells me glorifying an actor as bad as Trump is the real source of the confidence trick he pulls off. It's mimetic. No one wants to admit the emperor has no clothes, or genuine charm.

Expand full comment

I think you need a gut check.

Expand full comment

Hm. Checked it, yeah still wouldn't trust Mr Grab Em By The Pussy.

Expand full comment

1) You've revealed your bias.

2) And your purity check over everything you've said in your life will not reveal any macho braggadocio locker room talk. Because soy boys don't grab anything by the pussy, ever.

Expand full comment

Your buddy was with Epstein. That's your hero.

Expand full comment

Oh please. You could not be any more predictable.

Expand full comment

No one in their right mind would knowingly participate as the target in anything so reckless. Way too many variables to go wrong. Cling to your ideology if you must, but it doesn't pass the reality test.

Trump has ambition, love, children, grandchildren and focus. I doubt he would gamble on a perfect outcome for political gain. Although even in this moment of shots and chaos, Trump quickly perceived the marketing/merchandizing value and opportunity of the event--this is his nature. Now in the aftermath we have slogans, iconic pictures, mugs, posters, bumper stickers and on it goes.

Expand full comment
author

The other thing is that he didn't need to because he already had a big lead on Biden so it was a high risk low reward move.

Expand full comment

How does one explain his fantastic "instincts" leading him to pal around with Epstein and brag about grabbing women by the p*ssy? Not a word on his best friend being the guy the Reagan CIA director phoned daily hm? He's an obvious con artist, always has been.

Expand full comment

He may not need it to win the election, but there might be other larger reasons for it. He's getting sympathy that he wouldn't normally get. It's an opportunity to paint him in another light, a softer light, that will get more people to trust him. Is this because he will be the one to move the ball forward on digital currencies, digital ids, smart cities, and more surveillance? Only time will tell.

Btw, I'm 50/50 on whether he was actually shot or not. I laid a case out in another comment to your post.

Expand full comment

Yes, to me that’s the biggest reason that Trump wasn’t involved with the attempt. He was most likely going to win anyway.

Expand full comment

Also, never said Trump needed to do it. Powers much higher than Trump pull the strings. Should be obvious by now. All they need, is what they always need: to convince the public their puppet is fighting for them, even when his record shows otherwise (operation warpspeed, stimulus money, cares act, etc)

Expand full comment

I will never forget that—“fight, fight, fight!” That gave me chills and shows his true character. He’s fearless and willing to die for the country.

Expand full comment

I'll never forget Operation warpspeed and the cares act and the stimulus money, ie inflation. They sure fooled you eh

Expand full comment

I have no ideology. In a simulation, the actors aren't let in on everything that's classified. Hitler worked with the bankers and corporations he spoke against who orchestrated the whole world war. Do you think they would've told him the fate he was going to meet? Politicians are pawns in their game like the rest. Trump's entire past shows you who he is. Interesting his miraculous "instincts" led him to Epstein, telling a 10 year old going down his escalator "I'm going to be dating her, can you believe it?", etc. Sure, he's a man of the people.

Expand full comment

"I have no ideology."

We can see that. It's not the flattering statement you seem to think it is.

Expand full comment

A mere statement of fact. Why would you think I'm here to flatter myself? I'm just amused by the hypocrisy on either political side.

Expand full comment

Not gonna lie, you have legitimate points.

If you could stop presenting them in the voice of a standard issue TDS suffering libtard, that might lend you some credence.

Expand full comment

Not my issue if plain old facts are colored a certain way in the eye of the beholder. That bias is theirs and theirs alone.

Expand full comment

Your comments on this page all sound like you've been living in a liberal bubble.

Expand full comment

If you had read my comments you would have seen I am not a liberal. You're living in the Delphi technique.

Expand full comment

He doesn't care about those people and would totally trade them to stoke his own ego. But I don't think he would risk death if something went wrong. Too much a narcissist.

Expand full comment

Theoretically possible. But he's my bull in a china shop. Nobody else will attempt to destroy the corrupt administrative mafia. Best shot we have (no pun intended).

That said, I think you're wrong. So many more things from his past suggest a thankfulness to be living in America, far more than mere loose association with particular people.

Expand full comment

Roy Cohn WAS the mafia.

Expand full comment

Cohn hated communists

Expand full comment

Odd then that his pupil would be giving out stimulus money eh? Who created communism? Look into its history. Everything is fake.

Expand full comment

I do not disagree with your views on the lockdowns, Covid response, stimulus, all of it.

I was going to vote for RFK Junior until Saturday. Trump’s actions in that moment showed his true character in my opinion.

If Karl Marx didn’t create communism, please tell me who did.

Expand full comment

Jake has terminal TDS☠️

Expand full comment

You have terminal hero worship. I'm not a democrat. The wings of the same bird. Trump is a classic politician in that he is there to say what you want to hear, convince you he's one of you, and then sell you out. Just like he did last time, when he "drained the swamp" by putting in Bolton and Mike Pompeo. When he gave you Operation Warpspeed. Sure, trust a politician and then tell the politician's skeptics they're the mental defectives.

Expand full comment

In my view, some of your criticisms are legitimate. Did Trump do anything good in his first term? Anything at all?

Expand full comment

Didn’t get us in any new wars, which make him one of the few Presidents who didn’t, low inflation, low gas prices, peace in the Middle East, southern border under control, beginning the Afghanistan withdrawal in a sane way (not the Biden way which got servicemen killed and left behind 7 billion dollars of military equipment), no men in women’s bathrooms or the potential for them to take scholarships away from deserving girls in sports, judges appointed to the Supreme Court reversing some of the nonsense that has been going on for decades (Chevron Deference), reversing the trend (at least in some states) for women to have abortions at anytime during the pregnancy via overturning of Roe V Wade, kept jobs from going to Mexico and or other places.

Everyone needs to remember that he may have reluctantly, based on the recommendations of Fauci, a very powerful member of the permanent Administration, agreed to “15 days to slow the spread”, but it was blue state Govenors that enacted the draconian lock downs. Trump wanted to reopen schools and the economy. He is not a health professional, nor was he all powerful contrary to what some seem to believe. Whenever he mentioned any potential prophylactic or treatment he had heard about he was ridiculed mercilessly. He didn’t mandate Warp Speed vaccines, that was Biden.

Expand full comment

Low inflation? He created this inflation with the CARES Act. Largest upwards transfer of wealth in history. They printed all that money out of thin air. Thats not even a conservative value. Trump, the lifelong Democrat.what a joke it all is.

Expand full comment

Did you send your stimulus checks back?

Expand full comment

I agree with everything you said. The question was to see how objective Jake is.

Expand full comment

My guess is Jake is not objective at all😊. TDS is very real, I think they need to add it to the list of psychiatric diagnoses if it’s not already there.

Expand full comment

Inflation wasn't low because of Trump; it's stupid that people attribute that to the current President.

But he did run the biggest deficit of all time, even before Covid. The 3rd largest growth in national debt in history (after George W and Lincoln.)

Expand full comment

Are you suggesting fiscal policy has nothing to do with inflation. I agree inflation is complex and based upon many factors, one of those factors being fiscal policies established by the President. It was much easier for people to afford groceries and gasoline, the very basics of existence under Trump than it is under the current administration.

It’s also easy to make statistics “lie” to show whatever you want to fit a narrative. For instance is that “largest deficit and 3rd largest increase in debt” that you cite in nominal dollars, as a percentage of GDP or something else?

Here is another statistic for you “For all presidential terms (going back to President Carter) we examine at their 37th month, President Trump had the second lowest increase in prices, and the highest increase in real wages.  The Pandemic Recession that began immediately thereafter had many impacts on the economy, including soaring unemployment but continued low inflation. The official wage and price data indicates that prices rose by 7.8%, and real wages increased by 7.1%, by the end of President Trump’s term in office.”

Expand full comment

He's like DeSantis, quietly advancing the global agenda for turn key totalitarianism. For instance if you read the bill DeSantis signed that everyone was freaking out for not going far enough or whatever, it included a line allowing for forced vaccination. That's the main point with all these politicians, be it Trump or whoever. They are professional con men. There to gain your confidence and screw you.

Expand full comment
Jul 18·edited Jul 18

https://www.mintpressnews.com/blackmail-jeffrey-epstein-trump-mentor-reagan-era/260760/

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/06/donald-trump-roy-cohn-relationship

still, I'd like to think , given apparently Cook was a jew, father a shrink,, which counts.... Trump might get his conversion, TO 'antisemitism' like Paul on the road to damascus. then again, I would think he would deport all the jews to the Ukraine, where the Rothschilds wants them to go in the first place.

they plan , like Cool Hand Luke, for a losing hand.

be wise as serpents is hard in a nest of vipers in a pit full of slaves.

Expand full comment
Jul 18Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

There are other areas of life where intuition can be accurate. I am a retired nurse and for years worked in cardiac critical care. As a nurse, I became very accurate in telling which patient was having a myocardial infarction. These patients just had “the look”. I believe intuition is subconcious trained observations, where your brain is taking in many pieces of data in a split second.

Expand full comment
author

100% agree.

Expand full comment

Brain and gut.

Expand full comment

To say nothing of this nurse's care and love.

Expand full comment

In Norse mythology, Odhin has 2 ravens on his shoulders - Thought & Memory (Huginn & Munin). I've meditated on this extensively, and decided that Thought is Yang, creative, active, analytic powers, while Memory is Yin, intuitive powers, emotional intelligence. I believe that Munin/Memory taps into the collective Memory, and if you can listen - this Memory is the source of intuition.

Expand full comment

"One of the many unusual things about this event was that mainstream networks (e.g., CNN) decided to livestream Trump’s Rally (whereas typically they don’t), which in turn would have led to Trump being shot dead on national television (in essence mirroring what happened to Kennedy 61 years ago when a lone gunman [who was under CIA surveillance] somehow penetrated the president’s security)"

As you surely know, the JFK assassination 1) was not televised and 2) was not the work of a lone gunman (let alone the patsy claimed to be such). In fact, the first nationally televised public viewing of the Zapruder film did not take place until 11+ years after the assassination, in 1975.

Expand full comment
author

I did not word that well and fixed it. I was deliberately using that phrase since people are familiar with what it entails.

Expand full comment

Well, it would certainly be interesting to know who gave CNN a "heads up" to cover the rally.

Expand full comment

I posted this above, …I think I heard this on Man in America, quoting someone else (followed so much cant remember!) That photo of the streak of a bullet, cld hv been photoshopped I am sure, but, apparently was taken with the super fastest shutter speed (8000). Why did the CNN photographer need that at just another rally, let alone being there unusually! He/she took the rapid shots, believing they would get The Explosive (sorry pun not intended) exclusive, that would set the US on fire. And well blow me down, it missed, but hey I got THE bullet. :(

Expand full comment

THANKS VERY MUCH for this excellent article Sir!!

A note on the twin towers take down. A reminder on the Building 7 being dropped in its own track like any building professionally demolished with pre planted explosives exactly when the owner "Lucky Larry Silverstein told a fireman that it was about to be "pulled". The twin towers were converted to dust in EIGHT seconds, IMHO, by small back pack nukes and therrmite, obviously pre planted along with the Building Seven charges over 2-3 weeks of time by a large effort of manpower.

"Lucky Larry Silverstein had changed the insurance policies some time before with his knowledge of the destruction to come.

Expand full comment
author

I put a lot of thought into how much to cover on the 9/11 topic because I wanted to show 9/11 was part of a pattern rather than put a long screed about it.

My own personal big issue on 9/11 was them lying about the air quality after the first responders showed up and all people who had permanent illness and death because of it (and likewise I think the reason the buildings were such a huge liability was because no one could take on the cost of their contaminents being put into the air once they were demolished). I wrote more about there here:

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-can-wildfires-poisoning-teach

Expand full comment

Yeah, and then there is the coincidence of all the evidence of DoD fraud investigation of trillions of dollars missing (that Rumsfeld mentioned the day before) being in WTC 7 that got pulled.

Your focus is appropriate. And quite hopeful in that I saw what you wxplained - 30,000 at a rally with HD video cameras capture all the ACTUAL facts that can no longer be confiscated and edited like the JFK hit video. Can't get the public to buy the lie so long as the hits are captured and shared.

Expand full comment

The missing money was a HUGE story that was completely ignored. Catherine Austin Fitts and Dr. Mark Skidmore talk about it at length. You can look her up at solari.com.

Expand full comment

As a career firefighter with extensive training in building construction and the effects of heat upon building structural elements I was not surprised by the collapse of the two towers or building 7. However, just like 2016 when the deep state’s plan to sabotage Trump’s election in 2016 did not go as planned, and now the planned assassination of Trump has also gone afield, the 911 events may have had much more dramatic effects than any alleged conspirator/planners expected.

Expand full comment

I'm going to guess that most of this training related to brick and mortar buildings which certainly can be brought down by fire.

Steel buildings are much harder to bring down that way.

But let's assume, for the sake of argument, that they were.

The fire weakens the steel support columns until they can no longer hold the buildings weight.

Now recall that skyscrapers sway in the wind.

Is it likely that all three buildings would collapse straight down as if there were no structural resistance to their descent?

Why would they avoid what should be the easier path of falling sideways?

Hopefully you now see why what we saw does not correspond to a gradual weakening by fire but rather a complete simultaneous mechanical failure suggestive of controlled demolition.

And while it is still within the realms of possibility that the jet fuel from a plane could raise the building's temperature high enough to cause structural failure, it is far less plausible to suggest that WTC-7 fell from a simple office fire.

One, structural steel retains its full strength to just under 400 degrees Celsius. They are often built to hold around twice their weight for safety, allowing it to still function even at 650 degrees. This is why fires don't usually bring down steel frame buildings.

Two, there was not enough flammable material in the building to heat all the steel to that temperature.

Three, even if there were, it is not a sealed system, the hot air from the fire convects upwards and leaves the building. We can see billows of smoke leaving through shattered windows. Additionally smoke is a sign of incomplete combustion due to lack of oxygen bringing us to Four, the design of the building does not lend itself well to acting as a furnace or chimney. It does not possess sufficient ventilation to support continuous fires on all floors at the maximum burning temperature for those fuels.

If we read the government's own explanation of how the world trade centres fell, it describes exactly the fact that the temperature was likely far below the threshold needed to take the builiding down but instead mentions the unprecedented speed at which the fuel fire spread causing non uniform heat distribution and warping the metal.

However this doesn't apply to wtc7 which was a regular office fire.

In conclusion, WTC-7 is a smoking gun of implausibility.

Their claims are anyway absurd because all the buildings were on fire for hours, but there you go.

Expand full comment

Steel structures are particularly vulnerable to the heat produced by an out of control fire. Steel begins to lose strength and shape (the change in shape is an increase in length which if restrained can cause buckling of the steel) when the internal temperature of the steel approaches 800 degrees Fahrenheit. The amount of heat needed to raise the steel to such temperatures can often be quickly achieved with an uncontrolled fire such as what occurred at the World Trade Center buildings. Further applications of heat will in time further diminish the strength of the steel. Visit a blacksmith’s shop or a steel factory to witness the process by which iron and steel items are formed by raising the internal temperature of the metal by the application of heat. Thus the design and construction of steel framed buildings necessitates the installation of fire protective features to prevent the failure of the steel. One of the most critically important of those features is an automatic water fire sprinkler system. Those systems are limited by the amount of water that can be effectively delivered through a complex system of piping. (The design theory is to quickly suppress and control a fire before the limitations of the water delivery system is reached). In the World Trade Center towers the impact and intrusion of the planes effectively destroyed the water sprinkler systems along with most of the other combined fire protection systems, such as fire retardant walls and ceilings and coatings applied over the steel. In building 7 the piping for the sprinkler system most likely remained intact, but the water supply available throughout the entire World Trade Center Complex would have been severely taxed, if not rendered completely unavailable to supply the system in Building 7. Over time with the continued increase of heat from an uncontrolled fire inside the building, the steel will undoubtedly will fail. The failure of steel supporting the weight of numerous other floors will immediately result in a sudden collapse and then a sudden impact load on the structure of the floor immediately below, and then the next one below that one, and on and on until solid ground intervenes to impede the unrelenting force of gravity.

Recently a fire involving a tank truck containing petroleum fuel positioned below a concrete/steel structured bridge supporting route I-95 in Pennsylvania collapsed from the heat generated by the fire. I have no doubt most of the heat generated escaped out into the atmosphere, yet the steel failed and the bridge collapsed.

Expand full comment

My fire training encompassed all types of structures and structural materials, not just “brick and mortar” buildings. There are very few materials that are not in some manner affected by fire and heat.

I have found there is a general misunderstanding between the concepts and relationship of temperature and heat. On a hot, sunny summer day a person can almost instantly fry an egg on an asphalt road, yet the external air temperature may not even be 100 degrees Fahrenheit. But even at 100 degrees Fahrenheit continued application of the heat from the sun will raise the internal temperature of the asphalt well above the 100 degree air temperature. The same concept can occur with a fire burning in a steel framed building. The temperature of the fire and the air may only be 1200 degrees Fahrenheit, but the continuing application of heat to the steel can raise the internal temperature of the steel well above the temperature of the fire and surrounding air.

Expand full comment

Generally speaking, no the internal temperature of a material cannot exceed that of its surroundings through normal thermodynamic principles.

In the case of asphalt, the incoming radiation originates on a star with a temperature of well over 10000 degrees. It can heat materials to desert like temperatures, but there is a point where it loses heat at the same rate that it receives it.

So the important point is the energy equilibrium not the duration. Unless we are talking about an object that cannot shed heat for some reason.

And as for the bridge collapse, although I'm not intimately familiar with every fire in the world, I think there are several important points to mention.

First, notably, it would be more convincing to talk about a recent high rise steel building collapse. Unfortunately there are almost no such cases, so it would only serve to diminish the argument when you relate that out of 100 such fires, some of which lasted days and involved fires so intense that the entire building was blanketed in flames, only about 7 have fully collapsed. And of those, I believe only 4 collapsed straight down, which was the three wtc towers and a building in Tehran widely suspected to have been demolished due to the fact that the fire was actually extinguished prior to the sound of explosions and a rapid collapse.

Secondly, the fuel source was directly under the bridge support allowing the heat from the blaze to rise into it, with excellent ventilation, perhaps allowing the fuel to reach its maximum air burning temperature.

Thirdly, the bridge was probably not designed to withstand fires, unlike steel high rise buildings. We can also note that the volume of steel subjected to the heating is much lower and much of the bridge was surrounded by concrete, a known insulator. This may have prevented the heat from distributing to the other sections of the bridge, allowing a small amount of metal to warp far beyond what the section could withstand.

From a brief look at the bridge, only the section directly above the fire was damaged. Lending credence to the theory that heating was localised.

To summarise then, I'm not saying it's physically impossible for fire to weaken steel. I'm saying that the exact conditions required to weaken steel are difficult to achieve in a large structure, using office furniture, with a badly ventilated fire, such that the failure would be symmetric and simultaneous.

Expand full comment

Heat is the centuries old method of turning steel into a plastic, sometimes liquid material, to form other shapes, such as steel beams and columns.

What other steel structured buildings you referenced were struck by fully fueled passenger air planes? Steel integral to the support of a structure must be protected from the heat of a fire, otherwise it can be subject to structural failure if a fire should occur. For most structures, like a high rise steel framed building, the only way to effectively and efficiently accomplish that is with a fully automatic water sprinkler system in conjunction with other fire protection measures, such as fire separations with fire resistant walls and ceilings, and heat retardment treatments applied to the surface of the steel. When the airplanes crashed into the towers those fully automatic water sprinkler systems along with the other fire protection measures were effectively destroyed thus leaving the steel unprotected from the heat of the fire. Collapse is a real possibility. No other devices, such as explosives, are needed. I watched the live news feed of the fires at the World Trade Center. My heart went out to my fellow firefighters in New York City as they risked their lives in a “no win” situation with the glimmer of hope of saving other peoples’ lives at the risk of structural collapse and loss of their own lives.

Expand full comment

You don’t think Building 7 was a controlled demolition? I don’t see how it could be anything else, especially after reviewing the video again. To me building 7 is the ultimate smoking gun regarding 9/11.

Expand full comment

No, I don’t think so. Do you really need any smoking gun(s)? Years ago the city where I served as a firefighter had an out of control auto insurance fraud problem. People were intentionally crashing cars and claiming fake injuries. It went on for several years in spite of firefighters begging for an investigation as we were wasting time and precious resources responding to these “accidents.” Insurance companies seemed more than happy to just raise rates. The understaffed police were too busy just keeping up with immediate 911 calls for response. It all came to a head one day when the staged car crash killed “grandma” who happened to be riding in the car. My point is sometimes planned actions end up having consequences more dire than what was planned or reasonably expected to happen. Wouldn’t four hi-jacked passenger planes, two into the World Trade Center towers and one into the Pentagon and possibly a fourth into the White House be sufficient to bring about the planned result of implementing the unconstitutional Patriot Act and the invasion of Iraq? I think those would have been sufficient, but I may be wrong.

Here’s my humble opinion which I stated to anyone who would listen back then and now still: immediately after the events on September 11, 2001 we, the United States, needed to effectively seal our borders and deport anyone who was here on an expired visa or work permit. We needed to do this as other countries do, by shooting anyone who dared to cross our borders or otherwise enter here illegally. We still need to do it. In addition we needed to end our meddling in the affairs of other countries, bring all our military personnel and equipment home and ensure our defensives are maintained at sufficient strength to deter any other country/foreign entity from messing with us. We have all the resources necessary for a blessed existence right here in this country. Our trade with other countries should be based on fairness. Our states have strict clean air, clean water and labor standards. Trading with other nations who do not cannot ever be fair. The scale should be balanced with tariffs. Tariffs made our country for a period of time the manufacturing capital of the world; a prosperous country with tremendous opportunities for anyone with a desire and ability to work; a place where people from all over the world willing made sacrifices to migrate to. In addition we need to scale back our federal government to the limited enumerated powers granted to it by the Constitution.

Expand full comment

You make some good points but what do they have to do with Building 7? Go back and look at the video of its destruction, it matches a controlled demolition to a T. There’s absolutely no way it collapsed due to a fire.

Expand full comment

Nothing but red herrings and appeal to authority fallacies.

Don't believe our lying eyes is basically what you are attempting to convince us of. Sorry man, but you either have a serious case of cognitive dissonance, you are in some of the deepest denial I have ever seen, or you are deliberately trying to mislead people.

Expand full comment

So - been thinking about this a bit lately. Yes, demolition. But there were planes, too. People saw them. Not photoshopped planes, but planes in the sky that people witnessed.

And after the Lahaina fires, I'm much more likely to consider DEW - Directed Energy Weapons - perhaps as triggers for the demolition?

And who laid the charges? Are they dead now? It's a BIG secret to keep it under wraps like this. Yes, I did hear about strange "deliveries" & work on the building the week before...but there have to be personnel involved. Who are they? Military? Alphabet agency? And why are they still quiet?

Expand full comment

The "small back pack nukes" were Davy Crocketts. No real evidence of thermite. Nuking building construction material makes emulations of nanothermate. Ordinary demolitions on exterior, and perhaps interior of Building 7, quite adequate.

Expand full comment

No evidence of thermite except for the spent thermite dust coating NYC.

Expand full comment

Explained already; pay attention! Reiterating, nuking steel and gypsum wallboard creates a mimic of nanothermate.

Thermate, or any sort of thermite, is a horrendously inefficient demolition explosive, and the nano sort is also incredibly expensive.

Expand full comment

Okay, this is brand new information to me. I'll take it on your advisement to learn more. My assertion is directly from A&E911.

Expand full comment

While I like A&E911, they don't entertain nukes. I got that from Kevin Barrett.

Expand full comment

It is an interesting notion. Was any radioactivity testing done post-collapse?

Expand full comment
Jul 18Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

My spiritual teacher also says that the chaos will get worse but that it need not last long. He claims that an influx of spiritual energy has been and is raising the frequency of the people. Thank you for all you do. I for one am very grateful.

A Canadian Grandma

Expand full comment

Seriously one of the Best analysis of the skin cancer racket. Thank you for sharing this!! Some of the skin cancer research scientists and medical professionals at my university were so pale and sickly. Many of them were chain smokers. I literally couldn’t believe how illogical this all appeared to my young mind.

Expand full comment
author

The amazing thing is that the large swedish study showed avoiding sunlight is as dangerous for your heath as smoking.

Expand full comment

My mother died at 95, of old age and nothing more (2016). She was the ultimate "inside" woman who did nothing outside except water the flowers in the early morning. She was just never in the sun for most of her life. Yet at 90, she had a skin cancer on her cheek that needed Mohs surgery. Her experience makes a good argument for the danger of avoiding sunlight. We were all so shocked that she had it, too. Wish I'd known about this back in 2016!

Expand full comment
founding
Jul 18·edited Jul 18Liked by A Midwestern Doctor

As long as your email was in summarizing previous propagandizing campaigns, we're just getting started here. To mention just two of them: the 1898 Spanish-American war rapidly gained acceptance among the American public with the rallying cry "Remember the Maine", a warship that had been sunk in Havana harbor. Decades later no perpetrator had yet been identified... yet the public furor that "it had to be the Spanish" started a war. Decades later, the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 was thought to be a Russian provocation, and remained so for decades... until the Berlin wall fell, and the USSR besides, when western journalists learned that Nikita Khrushchev been responding to the earlier US provocation of deploying similar missiles into eastern Turkey... a short distance from Moscow,

We are not governed by honorable people. They are not your friends, they do not have your best interests at heart. Now the politicians have saddled us with the Ukraine madness.

So it goes.

Expand full comment
author

I started at WW1 to keep the article from getting too long!

Expand full comment

Sadly, it's a shockingly long list. This stuff isn't new.

Expand full comment

You are doing a disservice to the obvious psyop by analysing it in so much respectful detail. It was a fake piece of theatre just like EVERYTHING else on the world “stage” is 🎭 That is all a discerning person should need to know, it took me approx 10 seconds to work this out by taking one look at the Iwo Jima template photo (which is also staged!). We will NEVER know the truth of it so shouldn’t waste energy analysing it unless doing it for fun. And before any mind controlled zombie comes at me with “someone died you monster” or similar, that is not an argument for proving it’s not a staged event…I am very aware that Big EVIL is willing to kill innocent people whilst carrying out it’s psychological operations

Expand full comment

My dad, who died in 2006, was at Iwo Jima. He told me he saw the photo being staged.

Expand full comment

As always, THANK YOU. What you feel INTUITIVELY is totally in line with what I feel happened. I just posted a similar substack on it. The point is that INSTINCT is something that all living beings have but many humans have lost. And I, too, believe that spiritually, via our True Nature/Instinct, things can unfold/change so rapidly in a magnificent way that nobody would ever have believed possible.

Expand full comment