176 Comments

This documentary brings it all closer to home. See the stories and lives of persons injured.

More than 200,000 views in 48 hours, approaching 2,000 comments

"Safe and Effective - A Second Opinion" documentary

oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective

Please watch and share with at least one other person. It is excellent.

Expand full comment

I am really happy films like this are coming out!

Expand full comment

I just watched today. Excellent!

Expand full comment

The term "military precision" sounds great. But it's mostly PR. The military is full of blunders and "hurry up and wait"

But not all of it. When I moved into special operations circles there was a dramatic culture change.

What makes special operations circles more elite than the regular forces? Is it the level of training? Their command structure? The budgets and equipment? Their level of fitness and hardiness? Or is it something else?

Special operations units are run very differently than the rest of the army is. Like working for a small business versus a big business. Quick simple and efficient command structures. And they rehearse operations like performers would rehearse before going live. They use simple tactical risk assessments and algorithms to develop their skills, perform drills and mock ups before performing their operations. They trouble shoot them. Have contingencies established and more.

These table top exercises. These are run just like that. But instead of compounds and raids. Mountains. Deserts. Jungles. Land. Sea or Air. It's all communications and digital. Financial and political. But it's the same damn thing.

This was all planned and coordinated.

So is this law change.

Expand full comment

They were awfully precise about making sure I got every vaccine under the sun including an undisclosed contents one all of the sudden at the end of basic training in a rush in a chapel, a live virus flu mist (later stopped for making people get the flu), and three or four anthrax vaccine doses. I guess where the military precision applies is to really important things like using up the vaccine stockpiles to generate more lucrative contracts to fill them.

Expand full comment

I am still curious to see what the ultimate goal of getting everyone vaccinated was.

Expand full comment

You've already seen it. No Q card? Sorry, can't work here. No Q card? Sorry, can't shop here. No Q card? Sorry, no travel. No Q card? Sorry, no college.

It's the Chinese social credit system so admired by Trudeau that he made a point of mentioning it in one of his speeches. It's the method that, in combination with digital money and ID, will be used to control future dissent if current dissent doesn't put a stop to it, and soon.

It could be a population control program as some have suggested, but that a pretty big bite to chew off - 7.98 Billion at last count. More likely the vaccine was meant to deal with a virus *they* themselves created and released, the goal being as stated, except the law of unintended consequences kicked in, and now they're desperately stomping out brush fires that are springing up all over the place. If it's as bad as some of the data suggests, that will soon be a conflagration that will take the parties responsible along with it. One can only hope, as we're definitely not going to vote our way out of this, or convince enough people to force any kind of significant change.

Expand full comment

You have fallen into the psychological trap of judging others by your self. No, the Globalist/ World Economic Forum/ Bilderberg/ Trilateral Commission/New World Order types are clearly evil and Satanic, complete with ritual torture, rape, and murder, especially of children, plus human trafficking/child trafficking, drug trafficing, and pillaging the world economically through their fiat currency Ponzi schemes with derrivitaves, selling junk mortgage-backed securities, insider trading, bribes, and on and on. But their real dream is to exterminate most of Homo sapiens and turn the remainder into a slave class of brain-chipped cyborgs that will no longer be human. And the psychos planning all this believe they will achieve immortality by uploading their consciousness into a vast A.I. computer system and becoming silicon "life forms" vastly more intellugent than organic, carbon-based humans. There is only one word for those people: INSANE!!!! (And maybe a second: STUPID!!!!) Bus as idiotic as they are, apparently they really have such delusions and are willing to exterminate 95% of humanity to realize their goals.

Enter the COVID shots: time -release death by mechanisms already recognized but not to the degree of impact as is possible because most people cannot comprehend the lengths to which those people plan to go. Their slow acting poison spike shots may yet end up achieving much of the desired mass murder, as only time will tell if autoimmunity, cancers, slowly growing protein structures blocking blood vessels (mistakenly referred to as "clots"), prion damage to the brain, heart/kidney/liver damage, and neurological damage (including Parkinson's-like, and dementia) have the majority of shot recipients "marked for death". And the problem is that nobody knows. Also, the concentration of spikes in ovaries and testes, and the autoimmune problem with placentas, all acting to sterilize children and people of reproductive age, wil crash the human population over the next decade. Maybe much of this won't actually happen. Maybe their shots won't turn out to be as effective as they hope, but then again, maybe they will. Maybe only the relatively small number of the unvaxxed will be able to survive and procreate. Time will tell.

Expand full comment

One more point. Assuming what you say is true, then the first priority would be to stop the vaccine campaign. So, regardless of what their actual motives are, which approach has the best chance of success? Pointing out that the vaccines are unsafe (plenty of evidence) and that we ought to take a difference approach, or arguing that Gates, Schwab, Soros, the WEF, WHO, CDC etc. are running a plan to reduce the population and enslave us all in their digital matrix? Which is more believable, gets the maximum number of people on board, and has the best chance of success in the political arena?

Expand full comment

If the goal is to reduce the population there's a better way to go about it. Bring everyone up to the same standard of living as the West. The decline in birth rates below replacement rate is already an embedded feature of industrialized nations. If it's not possible to industrialize the poorer nations, most of which are in Africa, then why not run such a program only in those areas? Why attack populations with the advanced knowledge and skills you need to maintain industrial society when those populations are already in decline?

But let's see what the WEF has to say about it:

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/06/birthrates-declining-globally-why-matters/

It's just one article of course, but raising the alarm about declining birth rates does run counter to what people are accusing them of. But suppose it's true, and that the virus/vaccine strategy is aimed at population reduction. What are the real world implications of such a program, assuming the goal is to attain a reduced, yet still functioning society? Does the path we're currently on lead to that, or does it cause irreparable damage to the fundamental elements needed to sustain a population of reduced size?

Consider nuclear energy as one example. There are currently 437 operating nuclear reactors in the world. Those reactors need tens of thousands of highly trained personnel to maintain, and hundreds of thousands of people to support them in various roles. Take the city of Pripyat for example, which was built to support the operation of the Chernobyl nuclear facility, which at the time of the accident had a population just under 40,000. What happens if that population is reduced by half? What happens if key people go missing? You not only need those people, but you need a program to replace them as they age and retire. So, where do their replacements come from if you also lose half the people needed to train them?

Now apply that logic to oil exploration and production, mining and metallurgy, advanced manufacturing, such as microchips and pharmaceuticals and the transportation and support networks needed to maintain all that. Consider something as simple as a farm tractor. What happens when replacement parts aren't available? Even if you have a bumper crop it makes no difference if the machinery isn't there to harvest it.

The thing most people don't realize because they've never been taught to understand non-linear processes and second and third order effects is that if you remove even a few critical elements, entire production chains shut down. A friend of mine is facing just such an effect. He operates a wood chipping mill where machine bearings need constant replacement. Lately he's having trouble finding them because the company that makes them has reduced production, and other customers are hoarding in anticipation of future shortages. The point is, everyone uses bearings, and if they become hard to source, a lot of producers will have to shut down, as will downstream producers that depend on their inputs. In his case he supplies paper mills. Most people have no idea how critical paper mills are, and the effect that reduced production or increased costs have on the downstream industries that depend on them.

Ben Franklin summed up this problem over 200 years ago:

“For the want of a nail the shoe was lost,

For the want of a shoe the horse was lost,

For the want of a horse the rider was lost,

For the want of a rider the battle was lost,

For the want of a battle the kingdom was lost,

And all for the want of a horseshoe-nail.”

Expand full comment

Your comment would make perfect sense IF the Globalist-types behind the WEF, the UN and WHO, the rest of the Bilderbergers, etc. were rational and sane people instead of Satanic psychopaths bent on exterminating humanity and, the really extreme ones, all life on the planet (by removing the atmospheric CO2, and screwing up the genetics of all living things). Their purported goal is to substitute Artificial Intelligence silicon "life forms" for carbon-based life forms. They claim they believe that they can achieve "immortality" by "uploading" their consciousness into an AI cloud or some such utter nonsense. Yeah, right! Like today's computers last more than a few years?! Good luck with that B.S.! In the short-term, the only humans they want is a remnant slave-class of brain-chipped Transhumans that will do exactly as they are told (and eat insects!).

So the sensible idea of industrializing Third World nations so they will voluntarily have fewer children just isn't good enough for them. They want a reduction of at least 90%, and some of their writings (for distribution to their "inner circle") reportedly call for like a 98 or 99% reduction. Obviously, they are just evil AND nuts! Which is why they must be defeated and neutralized.

Expand full comment

Depopulation/sterilzation.

AND get everybody sick so Big Pharma can sell more drugs, before the injected patients expire.

I wonder if Bill Gates has investments in coffin manufacturers or funeral homes?

Expand full comment

This one is my greatest concern. There really should be contingencies in place incase this event does occur. Just like we have fire prevention drills and equipment available in workplaces. Might not need it. But if you do need it. You need it.

Expand full comment

There must be something in the vax that everyone has to take. If the only goal was a digital id, then they could have accepted natural immunity as equivalent to vaccine immunity (natural immjnity is in fact a lot better than vax immunity)

Expand full comment

It is very possible. However, since I have a large platform, I have to be responsible with what I say on here, and I thus cannot assert a suspicion is truth if I do not have the evidence to support it.

Expand full comment

MONEY. MONEY. MONEY. mRNA shots from here to eternity. Vast plans made by half-vast planners to save a ship of state already half-way down to Davy Jones' Locker .

"Big Plan ends in SNAFU" (future NYT Headline ;>)

https://peterwebster.substack.com/p/vaxscam

https://peterwebster.substack.com/p/re-bigpharma-negative-return

https://peterwebster.substack.com/p/scams-without-end

https://peterwebster.substack.com/p/planned

and last but not least, Big Pharma Blew It!

Imagine that BPh had created the perfect money-maker scam...

https://peterwebster.substack.com/p/big-pharma-blew-it

Expand full comment

Hello, not sure if anyone has realised, but the 2nd part of California's misinformation epidemic has been made impossible to either save or print. If I try to print the 19 pages I get pages 1,9,10,11,17,18,19. If I try to save the comments as a PDF the page count is 33,000 +

Expand full comment

I think you are viewing the comment page rather than the article. Use this link: https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/californias-misinformation-epidemic

Expand full comment

Thank you for your courteous reply. Once again, the article will only print pages 1,9,10,11,17,18,&19. As for the comments, when fully opened, (many of the "replies" are yours), list the number of pages as 33,488. The last time I tried to download them to find out what they were, after a full 8 hours I gave up. Someone has damaged your file, perhaps Substack can help? Chris.

Expand full comment

This is amazing. Thank you.

If anyone had told me 5 years ago that my liberal friends (the term liberal is used loosely here) were going to be cheering on censorship, defending billion dollar corrupt industries and advocating to shut down the economy, which ended up thrusting millions of unsuspecting citizens around the world into financial crisis and even starvation, I would have thought they were crazy. RFK jr, Naomi Wolf and a few others didn’t fall for it but wow, this has been a wild departure from how I viewed the left. I guess it makes sense because the left has traditionally embraced “for the good of the whole” and the right generally has embraced “personal responsibility” so the left was easier to co-opt in a pandemic situation, but this whole ‘for the good of the whole‘ has been such a scam. People going along with the narrative are ironically harming ‘the whole‘, AND individuals, in irreparable ways, often leading to death. But they just can’t snap out of the narrative enough to see how harmful all these measures have been. Its crazy. I have a friend who is angry that the.CDC stopped it’s masking guidelines and that they no longer recommend treating the vaccinated differently than the unvaccinated. She is in the narrative for life, I think. She started talking about wearing a mask every flu season because now she’s aware of just how dangerous it is not to wear one. She brought a huge air purifier to a class she taught at church.

There are so many things that have played into this scenario we find ourselves in. Leading up to 2020, germaphobia has definitely played a central role. I think the industrial pharmaceutical industry knew that it would pay off to lead people to be completely horrified of microscopic organisms, but to embrace dangerous medications and sterilized, disease causing food. It’s so backwards but it’s been very normalized. It’s how you get billions of parents to line up every year with their healthy children and have them injected with vaccines that supposedly save them from all these dangerous microbes right after they lid their children up with Tylenol and then take their children for ice cream. I used to be one of those parents. Thank goodness I learned better about a decade ago. People cannot even see the irony because big pharma has been running the narrative for decades. It’s such a brilliant businessman model. Sadly, we are all paying the price for this false view of health. The amount of money involved makes it seem unlikely to change directions. The money has infiltration many of the major industries. It’s discouraging some days but at least people are pushing back.

Thanks again for this brilliant piece

Expand full comment

Thank you! Were you able to read part 1?

Some people have a lot of trouble letting their ideas go, and if you get right down to it, that has been the basis for many wars as individuals would rather die that let go of their beliefs.

The germaphobia meme has been promoted by industry for decades because it gives them a convenient lie that allows everyone to be absolved of their responsibility for creating chronic illness in the population and instead make money off the problems that have arisen.

Also you may have seen this meme but it's still very spot on:

https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/040/353/cover2.jpg

Expand full comment

The meme is hilarious and very true. I thought I was commenting on part one but looks like I accidentally opened part two before commenting. Looking forward to reading this!

Editing to add that I read part two and it is also excellent information, although horrifying. It feels like watching a train wreck in slow motion. I visited my daughter in CA to help her move back and the beaches were closed. I thought it could not get any crazier but here we are. I just keep thinking that this cannot be happening in America. Hopefully the courts will shut this unconstitutional law down.

Expand full comment

Elon musk upset a lot of people by tweeting it.

I suspect there are conservative areas of CA that are still fine but I don't know the state well enough to know where they are. It's always fascinated me how that areas with mountains are conservative and areas on the coast line are liberal and just how consistently that holds--and california has both!

Let me know what you think of part 1!

Expand full comment

In many countries/continents, the northern part is actually or perceived to be more industrious and contributing more to the economy than the lazy, not-so-hard working southern region.

Expand full comment

Yes! Except that people are basically good and loving. they don’t realize their goodness and generosity has been exploited and used against them.

Expand full comment

I think that was true at the beginning but if people are still trying to force others to do what they want them to do to feel safe, I would not say that is a good person. At least it’s not my idea of a good person. They’ve had enough time to calm down and reconsider all the evidence. At some point, I think it must be pride keeping them from considering that they have been wrong? No one can be blamed for being wrong sometimes but to persist in a state of ignorance looses the grace period of being nice and good, especially when it is at the expense of others. People are dying because of what is allowed to ignorantly continue in the name of ‘for the greater good’.

Expand full comment

"I guess it makes sense because the left has traditionally embraced “for the good of the whole” and the right generally has embraced “personal responsibility” so the left was easier to co-opt in a pandemic situation, but this whole ‘for the good of the whole‘ has been such a scam."

It's worse than that. A significant part of the contemporary Left are what I call World Changers. The pandemic didn't create them - they've always been here - it just handed them an opportunity. A World Changer is someone who is convinced of the need to force change in the name of some abstract greater good. They're convinced of the rightness and urgency of their position and will spare no effort to force their "enlightened" will on others. I believe the correct term is *woke.* They're not really Left in the traditional sense of the word, unless you consider Soviet era totalitarianism to be Left. Furthermore, while they can act independently, they're more often controlled by forces that are as far from the traditional Left as Alpha Centauri is from planet Earth.

Expand full comment

What I am stumped on with this is that prior to Obama, I felt the liberal half of the country was much more focused on wanting to help others, standing up to major wrong doings of the government/corporations and doing the right thing etc. but at the same time, the unibomber's manifesto, which was written well before that time characterized the liberals of his era and perfectly describes what I have observed in recent times.

Expand full comment

I think Trump was instrumental in steering the ship to the place we are at. He was the most hated figure in politics that I can think of by the left. Ever. I can’t even stand him and I have been a conservative all my life so I kind of get it. The media made it out like Trump was going to start rounding up minorities to be shot and that he was going to pour barrels of oil in the ocean for fun. The left was living in mortal fear before the pandemic even began. They had been primed. (BTW, I actually think Trump is a globalist. Minimally, we should all be able to see that he completely sold out to big pharma.) Anyway, he was tweeting and saying things that enraged the left (intentionally IMO) and so when it was time for people to take sides on the narrative of the pandemic, the liberals did the exact opposite of whatever Trump said. He said it’s not that bad, they screamed everyone was going to die. He said masks don’t work, they said wear two. He said HCQ sounded promising, they said it was foolish and dangerous. He said the numbers where inflated, they said the numbers were probably undercounted. He tweeted and got banned, they cheered on the censorship.

I think it was a set up. Call me crazy if you want. I’m pretty convinced Trump agreed to go along with whatever the people who are pulling the strings asked him to do in exchange for becoming the president. I think they are trying to get him in for a second term (the fed raid, etc). Okay, I might be crazy but it does make sense if you think about why the left went off the rails. I think I’ve hear it referred to as Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Expand full comment

I have a different theory of Trump. Yours is good, mind you.

I don't think Trump expected to win. Look at who he was up against. She (who shall not be named) had the entire weight of the party behind her and a huge bag of tricks to draw on. It was, after all, Her Turn (tm) and nothing was going to stand in her way - not even being chucked unceremoniously into a van when she had one of her moments.

The outcome was as it was because both candidates underestimated just how hated a figure she-who-shall-not-be-named actually was.

Right from the start Trump was in over his head. The man's just not that bright, and he's clearly a narcissist. Those types are easy to fool - just appeal to their vanity and you can get them to do just about anything. Trump's skill is reading a crowd, and getting them stirred up. Doesn't matter what it is that's eating them, he'll tune into it and present himself as the answer. MAGA was what they wanted, so he gave it to them, but winning was never the goal. Exposure was. Building his brand.

That will get you to the door under the right circumstances (see above), but that's as far as you'll get if you're not already on the inside, and Trump never was. That he got in at all was an accident, but once in, he was easy to control. Give him just enough room to think he's in charge, while the important stuff goes on in the background, beyond his knowledge - which wasn't to hard to do as he didn't seem that interested in the job anyway. Probably saw it as an inconvenience since his original aim was to build his brand, which was starting to sag.

I honestly don't think you need to analyze Trump in much greater depth. What's more interesting IMO are his supporters and detractors. Now there's a rich field of study in abnormal psycho-dynamics if ever there was.

Truth is, there hasn't been a genuine statesman in that office since JFK. Since then, they've either been players or fools. I think Trump's the later, but you might be right. It could be a clever disguise. Hard to keep that up though. I guess we'll see.

Expand full comment

I don’t disagree with your analysis of Trump. He clearly had no idea what he was doing. You can tell he has no deep understanding of political ideology and he shifts with the wind. But hear me out, the people at the top, whoever it is who is pulling these strings, needed Trump to win. Hillary was ahead in all the polls. Just like Trump was ahead in all the polls during the 2020... Coincidence? Maybe.

I think it’s pretty clear that this pandemic was planned (event 201, Fauci promising an unexpected pandemic, lab leak of a human made pathogen, etc). So if they (whoever “they“ is-maybe Gates, Maybe Schwab, maybe unknown entities) knew there was going to be a plandemic and they also knew that not one single republican would have gone into lockdown under a Hillary presidency. Not one single republican would have taken a pcr test voluntarily, or closed their business or taken an experimental gene therapy developed under a program called Operation Warp Speed if Hillary had created it. Republicans would have probably started a civil war.

Jan 6th is pretty good evidence of what I’m saying to be true. And yes, I realize that the events of Jan 6th have been exaggerated in the media but still, there was almost a civil war over an election to hand over power, precisely because no republican wanted a democratic in power during a pandemic and they could tell there was something wrong with the election process. I also find it interesting that Trump told everyone to come to the inauguration but why? What were they going to do? (Other than be set up to make republicans look like crazed, violent revolutionaries.) Trump didn’t even put up a halfway decent defense for his election fraud case. He’s STILL pushing the vaccines, even though he gets booed for it.

I think everything is unfolding as planned, including Trump’s election. But you are welcome to change my mind. Haha

Expand full comment

"But you are welcome to change my mind. Haha..."

The way you've laid it out you're more likely to change mine. Good job!

Expand full comment

"I think I’ve hear it referred to as Trump Derangement Syndrome."

It's now Post Trump Derangement Syndrome (PTDS) for people who just can't let it go.

Expand full comment

Sounds legit. Haha! And I have seen it. But in fairness, you know the corporate media, especially on the left, need him to be elected again. Their ratings have been in the dumps since he’s been out. But they still feature storied of him regularly. So for those suffering from Post Trump Derangement Syndrome, they have good reason to stay in a state of being traumatized. Unfortunately, I think he will be back.

Expand full comment

Yes, I see what you are saying is true but those who are “woke” have managed to take the whole Democrat party with them and they are none the wiser. I have friends who are going along with this bio-fascism, believing they are helping out the elderly and saving lives by wearing their little cloth masks. Useful idiots? (Rules for Radicals, I think)

The book, The Psychology of Totalitarianism was fascinating. I could see that it was primarily the Christian Right that was not falling for all of this (generally speaking of course) and the whole pandemic narrative felt like it had formed its own religion for the left, complete with faith, sin, prophets, Holy water, miracle healings, etc. The book helped me understand on a deeper level why I was seeing this phenomenon. If you haven’t read it, I highly recommend. I did take issue with the chapter on conspiracy theories because it seems like there is enough evidence of some very real conspiracies are going down but some good points regardless.

Expand full comment

People always want an easy way to feel like they are doing a good job/helping people/saving the world, and I believe the modern left really exploits that tendency to control its followers.

Expand full comment

Yes! 100%

Expand full comment

"The Psychology of Totalitarianism was fascinating" Got it. Haven't read it yet. Will soon though! Here's one for you. Foundational stuff.

https://sci-books.com/science-and-sanity-an-introduction-to-non-aristotelian-systems-and-general-semantics-5th-edition-0937298018/

Expand full comment

Sounds really interesting and a bit over my head. Ha! I look forward to reading it. I’ll probably try the abbreviated version first and see how I do. Thanks

Expand full comment

In part 1 AMD talks about Tiger Teams within corporate America that serve a long agenda. I see the weaponization of various grass roots ideas and philosophies as one more Tiger Team long agenda. Anything altruistic or intrinsically good they weaponize, ie. “for the good of the whole”

It’s exactly the opposite. An inversion

Expand full comment

Agree. It’s discouraging. It feels as though everything is just turned on it’s head. And who is the “they”? Does it go higher up than Gates and Klaus? What is their motivation?

I understand that people are being fooled into things that they think are good (like championing ‘defunding the police’ as if that’s what poor neighborhoods need) when such things are actually harmful, but why would the people orchestrating this be motivated to do so? It’s seems to be an anti-human agenda to just collapse the whole system but that’s just so hard to come to terms with because that is worst case scenario. I keep wondering if the actual goals are more subtle or if there’s some sort of positive goal that we all just can’t see. Money seems unlikely as most of the people at the top probably have most of the money in the world. Very strange. Why destroy everything good? Worldwide genocide looks more likely the longer this continues. But why...

Expand full comment

"“for the good of the whole” and the right generally has embraced “personal responsibility” "- I see it as self-reliant vs dependent on the government. It's quite true that many citizens are not able to become self-reliant. Lack of resources, education, ability might be deficiencies. But the government can only help in those matters and few of us object to that help. In the past we had social organizations that actually provided the one-on-one help that governments no matter how well intended can never provide. As government grew over time it replaced those societies and became less and less concerned with the persons and more concerned about enlarging their remit - more budget, more people, more managers who need subordinates. As the agencies grew they became even more ineffectual yet buried that truth.

I have now become a racist, white supremacist, xenophobe, transphobic, evil person because I assert failure and corruption of and within government. The pandemic has brought many more citizens to recognize the issues. Still there are many who can't see how badly they have been treated and defend our government. Perhaps they can't accept something they have become so ideologically attached to.

Expand full comment

I have also observed what you have described. It sounded good to hand over social programs to the government but things escalated quickly and now it’s just fraught with corruption and generational dependency.

The more government does for people, the less independent people become and the more government is needed. This is a viscous cycle and a very tangled web we have weaved for ourselves over the last 100 years. I’m not sure we can untangle it. I have wondered if this pandemic response (that has killed many) has been a way to try and reduce the population for budgetary reasons. Over in the U.K., they’ve been giving people medazalam (sp?) and ending their lives prematurely. They have been denying early treatments everywhere. Then the vaccine roll out, which coincidentally coincided with higher mortality. Cannot fund pensions and other unfounded liabilities? Maybe this is the answer they came up with.

Expand full comment

Catherine Austin Fitts talks a lot about this event being a financial coup and that it was planned in advance and that yes, it is about depopulation as a way to balance the books.......which is scary and depressing as hell....I don’t know for sure if she is right or even reliable but her insight is compelling.

Like you I also think the part of the population who lean left were emotionally primed/ abused for years by the media to be intolerant of any dissent.

Back in 2014-2015 or so I remember feeling very uncomfortable with the kind of emotional manipulation of the populace by the media and the character assassination of anyone who spoke out against powerful players or even just blatant nonsense.

I had a bad feeling that if the general population did not wise up to the fact they were being toyed with that really bad things could happen and guess what?......they sure have!

How is it possible that so many Americans are blind to the fact that for their whole lives they have been watching and listening to propaganda that has gotten more abusive, more extreme and more crazy making as the years roll on?

I guess it’s the slow boil theory.....that people don’t notice slow changes until it’s too late but what has happened over the last couple of years is extreme and happened very quickly.

I can only hope enough of us open our eyes to stop the killing machine from rolling over us all.

Expand full comment

I think we have been on a similarly journey. I still remember realizing that Fox News was just as biased and manipulating as all the left media that I despised. I suddenly felt as though I was watching WWF and the candidates were the fake wrestlers and we were the audience, cheering on this fake wrestling match but fully believing it was real.

One thing that I noticed specifically a few years ago is that people were no longer discussing ideas, they were simply signing on to an “idea” to show that they were “good”. I termed it the ‘moralization of issues’. People were no longer hashing out ideas, they were just supporting whatever sounded like the righteous thing and then treating others who didn’t agree as if they were bad. No one wants to be seen as bad. Social media seems to have ratcheted up this desire for people to be seen as “good”. I couldn’t believe that people actually thought defunding the police was a logical response to racism or police brutality. Like please, explain to me how defunding the police will solve this...?

It’s definitely been a complete psy-op. I may have mentioned it previously but the book, The Psychology of Totalitarianism, was really insightful. I took issues with the chapter on conspiracy theory but overall an excellent read.

I love listening to Fits. I hope she is wrong but it looks like she is probably correct. Heaven help us all.

Expand full comment

Do you remember this by any chance? The media went after the author.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tYT9_Kf7ZU

Expand full comment

Oh my, I thought I was speaking metaphorically but looks like there’s actual video of it. Haha That’s hilarious. Honestly, I think Republicans suffer from CNN Derangement Syndrome just as badly as Democrats suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome so this video probably really... really resonated with people. I told my sister that the only reason Trump won was because he was willing to flip off the media and that was enough for them. Haha. What a strange world we live in. Thanks for the laugh.

Expand full comment

I have Desmet’s book too and last summer when I first listened to him discuss his ideas and Hannah Arendt’s book, “The Origins of Totalitarianism” which I had heard of previously, I was able to make a bit of peace with how blind my family had become. It’s still frightening, even more so but I can see how vulnerable we all are to manipulation by military grade psychological warfare. I don’t get why Fitts does not like what Desmet has to say, there is plenty of room for them to be right and wrong about some things.

Most of my adult life I have been very skeptical of corporate media and in recent years it’s like I am watching these power hungry abusers behind the media gaslight and drive people mad.

We just have to tune it out and educate ourselves. Joost Meerloo’s “ The Rape of the Mind: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing “ is also in my need to read list.

Expand full comment

It’s true that we are all vulnerable to their tactics to manipulate us. It’s good to stay humble and have compassion. Although it is hard when the situation we find ourselves in last for years with plenty of evidence to pull people out of their hypnotized state if they are willing.

I also agree that corporate media is truly driving us all mad. Thank goodness for independent media. I’m not sure how long they will “allow it” so I appreciate it everyday.

I can see why Fits and the Breggins take issue with Desmet’s book but seems like they should be able to get together and discuss it and then move along. I saw that he was willing to discuss... We’ve all been made so paranoid over this whole ordeal that it feels like we are all suspicious of everyone and everything. Trusting the wrong source can now be a matter of life or death so it’s no small thing to be taken lightly. But transparency seems to be the best remedy for suspicion. Maybe they will work it out. Hopefully. No one gets everything correct all the time. Obviously there are a lot of hidden bits of information that keep us all guessing who knew what when and what their intentions were.

There really are a lot of insightful books on the subject. Thanks for the suggestion! It will go on my list.

Expand full comment

I don't think handing over social programs to centralized control works particularly well. But those that reject the religious groups that were effective led to even worse evils. Perhaps if the programs were devolved to a local level they might be more effective. As it stand now nobody is responsible for anything.

I lament the loss of self-reliance along with the help that could lead to that. Government has failed too many by not really caring about the people they serve in escaping their poverty. Throwing money at an issue really doesn't improve anyone but it allows many to claim they are trying.

Expand full comment

I agree with your sentiments. But it feels like the bell has been rung and we can’t un-ring it. I think local would be better but in reality, it would be much more difficult because local governments can’t just print money so they actually have to spend realistic amounts or raise very high taxes. People don’t have much of a stomach for actually paying what it would take to have current level of benefits. And then you have the issue of people wanting help but not wanting to improve their situation. Government can’t really do much about that. And then you have the problem of some people not being able to improve their situation, which also seems to be a growing percentage of the population. I think churches and other charities were probably best suited to this task but they aren’t perfect either and less people are participating in religious or other charitable organizations so it doesn’t seem practical to turn it over completely to religious and charitable organizations . And we have this growing desire for “equity” which means instead of helping people meet their basic needs, there’s an attempt to make things more equal, or distribution of wealth. This sounds great except that no one really pays, we just print money and then inflation makes it even harder for the poor to rise above.

It’s definitely a complex problem with no easy answers. And I didn’t even mention the raising rates of chronic illness (especially amongst the lower income levels) and catastrophically high medical costs. I have thought that the pandemic is probably more of an excuse to remake the monetary system (CBDCs) than a serious response to a virus. Financially, it feels like everything is imploding, and perhaps that’s the goal.

Expand full comment

MwD... Excellent review of our immediate past history. Depressing and infuriating! There should be massive litigation against all "providers" who administered these poisons. They are ALL - 100% - guilty of medical malpractice for failing to provide informed consent. There was none given. There is none given to this day. Any good litigator should be able to deal with this. The only thing these people understand is being sued or arrested. I have no sympathy for any licensed professional who blindly went along with the narrative. None.

Expand full comment

As I am sure you know, one of the major problems with law is the selective enforcement of laws.

Expand full comment

Another problem with it, as attorney Robert Barnes points out, is the corruption of the judiciary. He can fairly well predict if a case will be won or not (in this field - whistleblowers, mandates, drs losing licenses) based on the venue of the suit & the judge hearing it. If it's a liberal judge (and I too used to be a left-oriented liberal), it will not. Vaccine mfgr will win, Dr will lose, etc.) That's why I again support Pam Popper's Make Americans Free Again - she's defending docs who lose licenses, won a case in Maine, has won elsewhere) Robert Barnes' affiliated groups, Liberty Counsel, Jenin Younes, et al. Thank you again for this article - Dr Mercola even specifically named one of the global PR firms involved. People don't realize how powerful they are - I'd almost call them state actors.

Expand full comment

What is the PR firm?

Expand full comment

Now that Substack FINALLY allows me to reply, I also saw evidence earlier of involvement of French Publicis Groupe in the SARS-COV-2 European part of the drama.

Expand full comment

Edelman.

Expand full comment

Excellent post. Thanks.

Expand full comment

Yes. And, the size of the client's bank account. If you're sitting on a billion or so, the system will serve your interests.

Expand full comment

I live in California, am new to Medicare (lucky me!). In the run-up to my first visit for my ‘health assessment’, I let my doctor know I had survived Covid and had not and would not get the Covid ‘vaccine’. He didn’t push it, but encouraged me to reconsider, as this was ‘the only way out of the pandemic’. He, however told me that the large health care group he works for is not licensed to administer the shots! For that I would have to go to one of the ‘licensed’ pharmacies around (or one of the drive through vaccination sites, such as Dodger Stadium). Yikes! That was one of the myriad reasons I was - as he put it - ‘vaccine hesitant’. Sorry, but not going to allow someone who likely had a 15 minute crash course in vaccine administration to inject my with a rushed to market, novel ‘vaccine’.

Expand full comment

CA SB277 banning parental philosophical and religious exemptions in 2015 is why I wrote Mandatory Vaccinations = Totalitarian Inoculations in 2016. Even private schools were included. Before Jerry Brown signed it, only Mississippi and West Virginia= both Republican dominated states had abolished these rights. Washington state and Oregon citizens beat back proposed laws in their states that year. Only one hyperlocal paper would publish my series of objections to the misinformation used to crush opposition. Those evolved into the book with several editions, free to subscribers. CA doctors are reasonably paranoid about signing exemptions. There is far more opposition now than then, so that's inspiring.

Expand full comment

Thank you for doing a lot of the early work on this issue.

Expand full comment

from the shoulders of giants.

Expand full comment

Wonderfully insightful… truth through and through ! One of the general surgeons walked through the hospital today telling everyone “to follow the CDC new recommendations , take off your mask 😷!! Be free before we all get told to put it back on again”. With articles like yours and Dr. Korys’ and others , people are waking up! Great collaboration. Time to expose the perpetrators, all of them.

Expand full comment

The way the medical system is likely to be undermined is that people will eventually realize (those who have not already woken up to it) that the medical system is not there to help you, protect you, or advance your health, however much you may personally like your doctor. The medical profession's credibility will be undermined, and people will start seeking treatment outside of the medical system.

As a practitioner of Integrative Medicine, who is now practicing under the Health Freedom law due to being forced by the medical system to give up my license as a condition for speaking the truth, I was hoping this would take place faster, but I think it will be a slow burn. Many still have faith in the medical system, just as many people still believe that Democrats are fighting the Republican corporatists, not realizing that the Democrats have been on the pro-corporate bandwagon for the past 2 years. It'll be a slow awakening, possibly years, or decades for some, but the medical profession, and then the Democrats will eventually suffer severe harm to their reputations. Since Democrats are still likely to oppose Republicans, even though they realize they have been betrayed by the Democrats, it is unclear to me what will shake out from this political upheaval. One thing seems for sure: they system is in for a big shake-up, and it has created it Sui generic, without any help from Trump or Sanders. It's going to be a wild ride. We live in interesting times (gulp).

Expand full comment

A lot of people think "hippy doctors" are going to be one of the biggest growth sector in medicine over the next decade.

Expand full comment

Yes. There's already a "People's Health Alliance" in the UK, and they say there are groups from more countries contacting them all the time on how to get started. Pam Popper also says alternative med is her goal (and she is a naturopath).

Expand full comment

The big growth will be in overseas elective surgery. It's already well in place actually.

https://www.apollohospitals.com

Where I live, an Indian travel agent can book you right up to the operating table. Car to the airport, flight, pickup, hotel, meals, car to the hospital, and so on, all in one neat package. You can even recover some of your costs from our health insurance system.

I don't know about India, but any surgery I need in the future will be done in Japan where my wife is from, or just across the water in Vladivostok. I have zero confidence left in the Canadian medical system.

Expand full comment

I see a woman who trained to be a nurse practitioner instead of seeing an MD for my RA. She is fully trained in Chinese medicine, all disciplines, and practices functional medicine. My friends think she’s a hippy but she’s not.

Expand full comment

Hope not. "Hippy" has a strong correlation with THC use, sometimes imposed as strongly as these vaccine mandates. That induces assimilation into egregores, also including outright devils. I'd suggest you find another name. (You already use the term "integrative medicine", but that's hard to grok.) Hey, if these "hippy doctors" can get people to use THCV...

Expand full comment

That's the term I've heard used many times, but I get where you are coming from (especially since they tend to use other hallucinogens too).

I have quite a lot of thoughts on this line "That induces assimilation into egregores, also including outright devils" but hopefully you can appreciate why they go beyond the scope of what I can discuss here.

Expand full comment

Too woo-woo? You'd prefer I keep it on Alex Berenson's site? (Thank you for keeping commenting free. He doesn't always.) I'd be surprised if you've heard the term "egregore" used many times; it isn't even in most dictionaries. Even "grok" (SIASL) is far more common.

They do? I saw a book about some hippies grafting tomato plants onto Jimsonweed stalks. (Hard to believe; the plants look much different, but both are nightshades. At least it wasn't belladonna!) People eating the tomatoes (later-moved-in hippies, as I recall) were seen stripping naked (this was in SoCal, and atropine inhibits sweating) and talking to trees. They weren't even in "Paint Your Wagon"!

Despite massive CIA misinformation, I hope you don't call LSD, psilocybin, and like psychedelics "hallucinogens". Otherwise you'd better ligate your chromosomes back together. (Marijuana smoke is very mutagenic on the Ames' test.) They don't cause people to see what isn't there and mistake it for reality. And while what they do see may frighten them horribly, they don't tend to "love and peace" it. But hey, THC is a great party drug! Egregore is just another name for camaraderie. (Almost reminds me of the Qanon slogan - WWG1WGA. Also of a US Army chemical warfare cartoon saying the ideal chemical warfare agent would make the enemy not want to fight - reminiscent of nabilone, the Army called the "9-carbon compound").

Expand full comment

I came across egregore accidently on wikipedia one day and I have never seen or heard it mentioned anywhere else (unless I specifically googled for it). There are a lot of interesting dimensions to those drugs when you consider the nature of exactly what is being perceived and I have a lot of friends/colleagues who are deep believers in them, but I made the decision not to go into that topic because it's not my personal focus and other people are already writing about it so there isn't a need for me to publicize it.

Expand full comment

OMG! That photo of the COVID shot vial and label (?) tattoos made me feel a little nauseous, and I've seen some pretty gory things in my life. I guess the bright side, if there is one, is that when they make it to the morgue or funeral home, it will obvious that they were "vaccinated" in case an autopsy is ordered, or anybody wonders about things like bizarre material in the blood vessels during the embalming.

Expand full comment

"I and other providers are of the opinion taking Ibuprofen and Tylenol often significantly worsened the course of COVID-19."

Fever suppresses viruses and helps activate the immune system. Research shows that taking anything that reduces fever will prolong the illness (if taken during active viral replication phase). We develop fever for A REASON! Doctors who tell patients to take antipyretics during a virus are ignorant (no excuse!) or committing malpractice!

Expand full comment

If the bill passes, doctors become irrelevant. The bill writes doctors out of existence. They will simply be a carrier pigeon from pharma to you, managed by lobbyists. I was at first surprised that this wasn't opposed by every doctor's group imaginable, but then I realized that perhaps many doctors want the responsibility taken from them much like the tech companies keep asking for explicit instructions from the government on whom to censor. Once one becomes merely a button man who is told what to do, this perhaps seems to absolves one of the guilt for knowingly handing out harmful substances, right?

I had been thinking that you could still rely on hospitals for emergency treatments, but then what happens when they transfuse you with vaccinated blood?

Expand full comment

One of my colleagues ran into a lot of issues from receiving a transfusion of vaccinated blood so I am somewhat worried about that issue. Fortunately the Jehovah's Witnesses have actually developed quite a few clever alternatives to transfusions.

Expand full comment

Do you have any info on what those alternatives are?

Expand full comment

Tolerating a lower blood volume, collecting the blood that is lost in a surgery and re-transfusing it, donating blood before surgery and having it on hand to transfuse back into you.

Expand full comment

Thank you again for the thoroughness and detail of your writing! That was a huge time commitment to write these two articles. Because of you and people like you who are standing up for truth in medicine and health, I continue to be hopeful.

I'm sure you're aware of Dr. Malhotra, the well known cardiologist in the UK who initially went on TV to promote the vaccine, then after losing his father to what was surely vaccine injury spent many months investigating the trial data and other evidence, and he's now come out against the vaccines and demanding that the mRNA injection programs stop! He published 2 papers about this in the Journal of Insulin Resistance. He's appeared on many alternative news site, but NOT ONE mainstream media outlet has picked up the story. I am hopeful they will eventually and then the house of cards will start to collapse, and collapse quickly.

Expand full comment

Have you watched the documentary "Safe and Effective - A Second Opinion" -

oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective

Expand full comment

This one from Israel was made earlier and also never got any traction in the press.

https://www.truthforhealth.org/2021/07/documentary-covid-19-vaccine-injured-israelis/

Expand full comment

I plan to watch it this weekend. thanks!

Expand full comment

This is wonderful, thank you for writing it. Tessa Fights Robots is documenting a simultaneous attack on supplements and herbs https://tessa.substack.com/p/attack-on-access-to-supplements. This may all get worse, but I can't help but think that the new medicine you described (zeta potential) and the microdosing news of successful treatment of mental health issues and the discoveries and treatments of complementary and alternative and functional and orthomolecular medicine, in combination with Western medicine, is a huge wave that will destroy their business model, in which we are slaves or serfs to their model, commodified from cradle to grave, our sickness and need for care being the way they create wealth, as Utobian has described. But what waits in the future is human flourishing. This has been going on since classes and storage in the Neolithic, and the persecution of herbalists and gardeners by the Holy Roman Empire. I keep thinking about Greece and the Mysteries with entheogens, the Delphic Oracle, the drama which was meant to heal and transform. When something lucrative and gigantic goes down, it thrashes like a hammerhead shark crossed with Godzilla. But people are awake, and it will go down. Thanks for this history and analysis.

Expand full comment

What I am really hoping dawns on people is that if they were burying the treatments for COVID (despite a massive financial need to have a treatment for Covid so that businesses and the economy could stay open), there might be other treatments that have also been buried prior to COVID-19...

Expand full comment

Effective cancer treatments have been suppressed for decades.

High dose I.V. vitamin C cures any virus or toxin, including venemous snake bites.

Expand full comment

Yes the cancer industrial complex was a precursor to the covid industrial complex.

Expand full comment

The Disneyland measles outbreak was when I really noticed the propaganda. I remember thinking, "who are these highly educated parents that aren't vaccinating their children?" "What do they know that I don't"? That is why I really started researching. And it was very clear that the media was not interviewing those parents. Now, I believe it was a response to the movie Vaxxed coming out.

Expand full comment

Invaluable work as always. Much appreciated and very informative.

Expand full comment

Excellent! I pray with all I am this law gets appealed. I can't see how it even gets passed on violation of constitutional protections in the first place.Lets hope youre wrong and it does get up to the Supreme Court!

Expand full comment

In Emperor Gate's/WEF Amerika there is no room for The Constitution.

Expand full comment