You're correct this was a psyop not a medical threat but your criticism of dissenting voices seems harsh and unfounded. This scamdemic has many facets that only a handful are reporting and in the cases of Del & RFK Jr. they have significant roles in legal actions striking down mandates which is essential to preserving individual soverei…
You're correct this was a psyop not a medical threat but your criticism of dissenting voices seems harsh and unfounded. This scamdemic has many facets that only a handful are reporting and in the cases of Del & RFK Jr. they have significant roles in legal actions striking down mandates which is essential to preserving individual sovereignty & no small issue.
CHD did a round table about disappearing flu deaths & fraud of novel cause of illness. Between tech censorship and activists spread thin it's hard to find but absence of high profile search results is far from confirmation it is not happening!
They have had nmultiple, multiple people reach out to them on this, including myself, and they have equivocated and dodged it at every turn. It's reprehensible. Too bad if that punctures one of your sacred cows it's the truth.
My criticism is harsh and rightfully so. Unfounded? Hardly- it is founded on countless examples that illustrate the veracity of what I said.
You know, there is one thing about truth, or even TRUTH: you can hold it up to someone, so he can slip into it like into a coat, or you can slap it into his face like a wet rag.😐😐
There are no sacred cows and pretty insulting to resort to name calling when you have no flippin clue what my values may be. It always amazes me as an activist for 25 years in the toxic product & policy space how folks who have no record of accomplishments in the public debate rather take shots at the fighters for not sharing their priorities than put that effort into aiming for dirtbags.
It's incredibly hard to be in any type of a leadership role for a movement and I am incredibly grateful I am able to put out positive messages I believe can lead things in a good direction without simultaneously having to be responsible for all the extra things one of those roles entails.
Some of what Allen says here is spot on, other things I strongly disagree with, but I believe it's important to have both sides of each issue be presented even when I don't agree with him. That said, like you, I do not believe in attacking people I believe are genuinely trying to make things better.
You're correct this was a psyop not a medical threat but your criticism of dissenting voices seems harsh and unfounded. This scamdemic has many facets that only a handful are reporting and in the cases of Del & RFK Jr. they have significant roles in legal actions striking down mandates which is essential to preserving individual sovereignty & no small issue.
CHD did a round table about disappearing flu deaths & fraud of novel cause of illness. Between tech censorship and activists spread thin it's hard to find but absence of high profile search results is far from confirmation it is not happening!
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rfk-jr-podcast-flu-data/
CHD has been terrible on what I just referenced.
They have had nmultiple, multiple people reach out to them on this, including myself, and they have equivocated and dodged it at every turn. It's reprehensible. Too bad if that punctures one of your sacred cows it's the truth.
My criticism is harsh and rightfully so. Unfounded? Hardly- it is founded on countless examples that illustrate the veracity of what I said.
You know, there is one thing about truth, or even TRUTH: you can hold it up to someone, so he can slip into it like into a coat, or you can slap it into his face like a wet rag.😐😐
Or in this case you can camouflage it or cover it up with a thousand distractions and excuses.
There are no sacred cows and pretty insulting to resort to name calling when you have no flippin clue what my values may be. It always amazes me as an activist for 25 years in the toxic product & policy space how folks who have no record of accomplishments in the public debate rather take shots at the fighters for not sharing their priorities than put that effort into aiming for dirtbags.
It's incredibly hard to be in any type of a leadership role for a movement and I am incredibly grateful I am able to put out positive messages I believe can lead things in a good direction without simultaneously having to be responsible for all the extra things one of those roles entails.
Some of what Allen says here is spot on, other things I strongly disagree with, but I believe it's important to have both sides of each issue be presented even when I don't agree with him. That said, like you, I do not believe in attacking people I believe are genuinely trying to make things better.